This guy says that clearly. I feel like I am putting women above men actually. You guys think the opposite.
Let me restate that clearly. Under libertarian principle, women will RULE the world precisely because they’re sex object. Under libertarian principle, those who own something everybody want will rule the world. Man want women. Is that clear? Obviously it’s not happening too easily. After all, males rule the world, mainly through force and fraud right? Women neither own or control their body. They just think they are.
Well, to be honest, I used to think like you. We are all indoctrinated to think that women=sex object somehow demean women. I think that misconception is the heart of all bigger government, poverty, etc.
While demeans are not really a scientific term and it’s hard to argue about it, interests are quite scientific. We can observe what people choose when they have legal (or effectively legal) choice. It’s science folks. Keep that in mind.
Mama Liberty, what do you think?
Here is a quote:
“For a man to walk into a bar and have his choice of any woman he wants, he would have to be the ruler of the world. For a woman to have the same power over men, she’d have to do her hair.” -Bill Maher
Women don’t rule the world, because they never have to.
Here is another article:
“Would you rather be the second or third wife of Mel Gibson or the only wife of Willard Scott?”, to which one of the panelists, the conservative commentator and activist Susan Carpenter McMillan, responded, “If it comes to Mel Gibson, I wouldn’t care if I was one, two, or three.”
The battle between creationist and those supporting evolution theory is just started. However, those 2 articles will be what the mainstream religions will be.
Incoming search terms:
- powered by phpBB susan (1)