That’s the sunday school version of marriage.
The #1 reason why people get married is parenthood. We don’t know who dad is. So the only way in ancient time to know who daddy is if to have the wife commit to fuck only one guy, namely her husband. You see why most cultures, like biblical culture, allow polygamy but does not recognize polyandry? Polyandry has no points. We know who the mother is. You don’t need marriage to settle inheritance in matriachal culture.
Before only rich men with inheritance need marriage. Paternity assurance means a lot to them.
Then we got muslims for example, that insist that all men must know his father. Hence they allow contract marriage. Contract marriage to polyandry is like serial monogamy to polygamy. I am not saying it’s right or wrong. In ancient time I would do the same thing. It’s like now I am using email. In ancient time, I too would use post service.
That very important function is GONE. If I want to know who daddy is, I just do blood test. Done. Marriage will no longer protect you from paternity fraud.
Now marriage has mainly 1 function. Ensure that the state is da pimp. In muslim countries it ensures that mullah can persuade males to commit suicide bombing. Only males approved by mullah get laid because sex outside marriage is illegal. In western countries, it’s there to ration mates in equal share for everyone.
Obviously because each beautiful girls have tons of suitors and there are many rich males that want many women, the market sort of take care of things and expect males to pay everything.
It’s natural that men pay women for sex. It’s how the market decide. Obviously people are free to do it differently and I am not against that. But if the market decide that men pay for women or white guys earn more than blacks, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. What the market decide is what fair is.
In western civilization and ONLY in western civilization, or westernized civilization (everyone else now), marriage has another important meaning. Rationing mates in equal share for everyone. Think for a while. Let’s look how life works before 1900. What other civilization prohibit polygamy? Think. NONE.
I do not know whether it’s a good thing or not. As a libertarian I would say, what the fuck? But hei, western civilization is the most advance civilization for now and I can’t just say they’re wrong. It’s the same trait that also make them love freedom, democracy, and socialism, with various aspects. It’s teh thing called equality.
GDP will come telling how I am wrong or how I don’t understand what I am talking. GDP will say that women want love rather than wanting to be a whore. GDP will say that kids need their father to spend time with those kids.
You know what? Let’s ignore for a while whether I or GDP is the one that’s right.
Why not let the market decide that. All consensual sex between adult that can fully financially support their kids are none of governments’ businesses. That’s all I am saying. I may be right or I may be wrong, but let the market decide. What is so unlibertarian about that? Where do we differ on this?
What about “teh children”. Let parents decide what’s best for their children. If parents want to teach their kids that the sun circle the earth, let them be. It’s none of governments’ business.
Some people said that it’s bad that children don’t have their dad. You know what, let the market decide that. It’s legal for poor guy to reproduce, why it’s illegal for rich promiscuous guys to reproduce? You mean dad’s promiscuity hurt kids more than poverty? Wanna ask that out in sceptic forum?
Actually GDP is WRONG. Love is total bullshit. Marriage is just a heavily regulated prostitution to ensure that the state is the pimp of all hoes. That’s it. You do it outside the pimp, they call it oppression, slavery, etc. You do it one on one as they wish they call it love. The rest are just bullshit and word crafting.
And when free market decide that, what’s bullshit will be seen as bullshit. And that is that. Now we can argue all day long on what women want or what’s best for kids.
1. I said women want best cock attached to great wealth. GDP says women want love.
2. I said kids should be raised by rich males. GDP says education/whatever produce smarter kids.
3. I said many rich males want to make tons of kids. GDP says the richer you are the less kids you want to make.
4. I said women trafficking and prostitution is often consensual and by far it’s often the best deals for women. Feminazis says that all those are forced and somehow criminalizing them will make things better. GDP is moderate on this (am I correct GDP?)
5. I said the real reason behind all those criminalization is to control women. It’s simple. Husbands can’t compete with johns so they prohibit johns. GDP think that people want criminalization because they honestly think those women are oppressed and somehow we need to correct their thinking. I’d say what all those ugly bitches think shouldn’t matter at all. Under free market we only care about what our target market want. 99 ugly bitches don’t want to be a whore. Yet 1 hot babe want it. The wish of that one 1 hot babes should be all that matter in deciding whether this should be legal or not.
My point, my whole point all this time, and I wonder where do we really disagree is:
LET THE MARKET DECIDES