Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde We’re fucking human beings. Always let your values lead you, not your lust. Can I rub my dick against your sister’s tits if she writes articles for me? but if you were trolling, then I guess shits and giggles bruh! lol

My value is simple. I create the job. I own the job. She doesn’t like working with me, go somewhere else. My money, my body, her cunt, WE decide. It’s no body else’ biz what those terms are unless on some really extreme cases (90% of population agree this is fucked) or if others are non consensually affected.

For example, if government still build public school, or social program, those who can’t afford to fully pay all their kids need must not reproduce. That’s not victimless. There are victims, namely tax payers, or the kids that ended up being born to poverty.

We prohibits porn for minor because it’s danger, yet we do not prohibit popping kids into poverty, that is even far more dangerous. That doesn’t make sense to me.

If I want all women employee that work with me get nekkid, that’s none of government’s biz. Of course, I may have a hard time getting an employee if that’s my way (actually not ). But that’s something the market should decide. Not government.

If my idea of marriage (I am not muslim here), is bdsm, that’s none of governments’ biz. Of course, I may have a hard time getting a wife if that’s my idea of marriage. But that’s something the market should decide. Not government.

The problem is not that some marriages ideas are bad. Even under free market, some deals are bad. But those deals go away by themselves replaced by better more fair deal. The problem in marriage, government has power to prohibit alternatives and hence effectively force those bad marriage ideas.

Should muslim men beat up their wifes? Well, should american males ended up like Beatty Chadwick H. Beatty Chadwick – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Simple. Just include that material terms on marriage vows, and see whether people would still agree.

Currently people are simply presumed to agree. Most popular alternatives are illegal. The terms are hidden well beyond marriage laws or some holy books with flexible interpretation. Why not make it explicit what people are actually agreeing too? Why not give people freedom to decide what they agree. Duh. That’s what we mean by agreeing right? Like any other contracts.

When they make contracts explicit, the rest of us can know whether something un consensual is happening and whether we should move on. That’s all.
But by being married you agreed too.. Bla bla bla bla… People do not even have freedom to define their own marriage. C’mon.  Also legislators made those terms. Not them.