Are the Rich Less Generous

Posted by admin | Uncategorized | Thursday 7 January 2010 12:02 pm

The problem is not people are less generous. People are MORE generous now than they are thousands of years ago. In ancient time, the poor got only 2% of money in Muslim countries.

Now we pay 30% income tax most of which goes into wealth redistribution. What else, given that the market can provide far superior service more efficiently anyway. So we are 15 times more generous.

World GDP is 300 times it was 200 years ago. Human race is 300 times richer.

If we have the same number of fuck ups now than we have 200 years ago, non of those fuck ups will be “poor” by 1800 standard.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is the fuck ups, irresponsible, lazy, stupid, socialists bigots out breed the prudent, smart, diligent and hard working. The problem is we got smart people like HaRRo that are too willing to sacrifice himself in altar of socialism to fed the parasites. Sorry HaRRo. We got to repent.

Anyone opposing freedom want to enslave others. Yielding to their kind is like cutting our own hand throwing it to lions hoping the lions will become vegetarian. If anything, the lions will just breed and breed and kill us.

If you run the fastest you simply have to show that you too can hit the hardest.

I love poor people. Many of them work hard for me and we both make a lot of money. None of those that work hard for me work as hard as me though. But well, we’re getting somewhere.

It’s the mindset that’s wrong. We encourage the poor to breed by subsidizing those that make kids. When subsidy is given, supply and demand curve no longer meet creating surplus of humans, causing unemployment giving rise to more justification for bigger government in never ending vicious poverty cycle.

Just pay anyone that don’t have kids and legalize commercial sex so the best brightest richest (like our mods) can knock up all the hot babes. Then encourage porn so no ugly women get laid. Hell those ugly feminists can always enjoy their right becoming astronauts, programmers, scientists, or some grenade thrower in the front line anyway. I totally support affirmative action for all womyn that want to throw grenade in the front line, if they’re ugly.

Within 1 generation, all kids will have rich smart dad and hot sexy mom. No need to resort to violent to “exterminate” those we deem inferior.

But even those benign peaceful method is politically incorrect. We’re like gladiator being forced to kill each other by our leaders with their irrational faith based “morality”.

Capitalism is Great. Communism is Evil

Posted by admin | Uncategorized | Monday 21 December 2009 2:26 am

As for free market taking care of poverty, please read my e-book at http://genepoolsurvivalguide.com (free for you).

Poverty is CREATED by government.

If women prefer the rich why would any kids have poor dad?

Yea, there will be those that slips through the crack. There will be those that slips through the crack through any system. I can get my leg broken. But I can get shot by robbers too when parasites make too many kids. I’d take the chance of getting my leg broken by car rather than get shot by robbers.

Free market is too abundance that it wouldn’t hurt to help a little. However, the way government implement wealth redistribution increase rather than decrease poverty.

Governments punish hard working poor people (like I was) by income tax. Then government reward lazy poor people to make money.

Many capitalists start of poor too and I bet they can get rich because they have ways to reduce their tax. There is no way you pay 30% tax head on and still can get rich. Income tax hurt everyone, especially working class.

It’s an irony to me that in general free market capitalism is the most pro worker economic system in the world. Capital owners get less and less under capitalism. Interest rate, if adjusted to gold price, is actually negative.

I was poor (and still work hard). My biz went up and down. Now I am middle class. I target my self to earn save $50k by 6 months. All thanks to capitalism.

The next time government tell you that it needs your money to help the poor, tell them that here is a message from a poor worker. Fuck off government. I don’t need your blood money. I just need more market.

And that’s ladies and gentlemen, where internet marketing comes in. A place where there governments haven’t touch that.

Wrong policy? Communism is more than just wrong policy. It’s bigotic genocide. They slander capitalists. They promote hatred against the productive. Then ups, it’s a mistake. We didn’t know it didn’t work. And they just get away with it. Still becoming the ruling class. Still spreading venomous lies. Then we forgive them because capitalists are good. Then they do it again till all of us are in gas chamber out of envy.

I’d say we hit commies with the same rules they used against us. What ever option they use against us, terrorism, murders, lies, deceits, should also be an option on our table. Unfortunately unlike those lies, capitalism do not need to be defended with lies, given that it’s the light and the truth and the way anyway.

Non Judgemental View on Consensual Crime

Posted by admin | Uncategorized | Tuesday 6 October 2009 9:27 am

Let’s ignore morality for a while.

Imagine a world where morality is just bullshit we use to persuade others to be on our side, usually enforceable by might. A world, not much different than the real one, but lets’ presume it’s true for a while.

Because there is no morality, there is no right. There is only interests. People want to maximize their interest.

Imagine if a woman is ugly.

Everyone wants to maximize their interest, and evolution theory tell us that it means reproducing.

Now here is an ugly woman.

What is the greatest danger this woman will face in successfully reproducing? Rape? Think again…

Rape is probably not on top of the “fear list” for ugly women.

Her main concern is competition.

Now if that women can choose, which one she will want to criminalize? Will she want to criminalize rape or porn?

Think about it, superior women. Ups. I got to pick my words correctly. Prettier women. Oh no… Beauty is in the eye of beholder. More attractive women. Hmm… that’s subjective. Let’s just say better “target market magnets” display all her assets in front of everyone. What will happen? It’ll create a new “industry standard” of beauty the rest must follow. It’ll drive the ugly extinct.

Now, put your self in the shoes of the ugly women. Wouldn’t she want to prohibit that?

Porn and prostitution is probably the only 2 jobs that most women can do better than males naturally. What I mean by naturally is women actually earn more money there than males even though they are not helped by affirmative action, etc. Isn’t it strange that the jobs that women do better are the very thing often prohibited? Also women want to prohibit that. However, if we understand reality, seeing through all the confusing words and look straight at photographs of those non libertarian feminists, everything should be pretty obvious.