Posts Tagged Thieves

Morality Has Many Definitions

Discover guaranteed proven new safe way you'll love and save money. 

YOU can EASILY Get girls/guys you want if you understand

Why rich smart males do not want to get married and why do unattractive people want everybody to get married?

or you can grab

Gene Pool Survival Guide with How to Learn Math e-Book for Maximum Saving

Written by world's #1 life guru. Also a mensa member that won international math competitions. There are ways to get what you want effectively. The most effective ways are almost always politically incorrect yet done by every winners. Math and common sense can see through important obviously true laws of life that most people will simply deny.

Knows the truth. The truth will, besides getting you laid and rich, set you free.

Morality has many definitions. The following are some reasonably intuitive ones:

1. What I want. I define immoral as people not doing things I want. At least that’s how most politicians think. Samples: watching porn is immoral because I don’t want you to watch that. I’d rather that I watch that my self.
2. What those in power want. Obviously you need real muscles so not to get ignored by those you want to control.
3. An art to cooperate. Those winning war and economic competition tend to be more just than those who aren’t.
4. What ever people believe to be moral. I like this definition more because it’s actually disprovable and verifiable. Then we can use evolutionary psychology to see how different idea of “morality” evolves.
5. Altruism. That means it’s important to teach others morality while not practicing it our self. A very common phenomena in the world.
6. An honest way to maintain reputation. Making money honestly is lucrative too and you don’t want to risk that for a small stealing. Of course, hypocrisy can be even more efficient.

In fact, taking money from the hapless can be common and moral, as in tax, at least in the eye of the parasites.

Morality is simply the interest of those who are in power. So yes, if you really think you can get away with it, and you’re in power to do so, just do it.

That’s what IRS did. That’s what pro health care people did. That’s what corruptors did. That’s what everyone that opposes free market did. Of course they don’t want competitors so they call it immoral.

If everyone else do it and you don’t, then you also act immorally namely that you are unfair to your self.

Just don’t steal mine though. I posted millions of thieves conviction record to avenge my stolen properties. But hei, after getting fined for threatening the thieves and contemplating morality for 8 years, I sort of understand. I don’t blame no thieves for that. Of course they did that.

Also, you sure you won’t get caught? If you are, chance is it’s over

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How to Create More Jobs With Less Government

Due to lack of death penalty the world is not getting any saver.

Furthermore, lack of commitment toward market mechanism leave poverty and misery every where.

Poverty

The truth is it’s hard to blame even the bad guy because being good just doesn’t pay a lot. C’mon. We’re all sinners. All sin must be prohibited. We prohibit that through laws. So all of us break laws. Laws are there so we broke it. Hence all of us are criminals. So laws really are not on our side quite often.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is this Hate or Love?

Differentiating which one hate you and which one love you is essential for gene pool survival. Let’s try a few sample.

Nazi killed Jews out of love or hatred for the Jews?
Terrorists commit suicide bombing toward hedonist tourists out of love or hatred for the tourists?
Muslim mobs stone those who have sex outside of marriage out of love or hatred for the adulterers?
Religious fundamentalists send people to jail for watching porn or hiring prostitute out of love or hatred for prostitutes and their customers?
Feminist prevent women from being consensually trafficked to mate with rich males out of love or hatred toward the trafficked women?
Government prevent kids from watching porn out of love or hatred for the kids?
Government regulate marriage out of love or hatred for those who prefer different arrangements?
Government prohibit ecstasy, which is far saver than cigarette and alcohol, out of love or hatred for users?

The answer is pretty complex. Quite often we help others not out of love, but simply because our interest coincide with them. Quite often we hurt others out of hatred, but simply because our interests are the opposite of them. However, that, in a sense, are hatred.

For example, we punish thieves not out of pure hate. We simply think that the guy will serve as samples of those who screw us. However, we can count that as hatred too and well, we hate thieves right? In a sense, all of our natures, are simply branch of our main desire namely greed. Others are just names on various ways we achieve that one goal.

US government shot an Airplanes full of civilians because there are terrorists there. Obviously this is not hatred. But is it? Imagine if their own family is in the airplane, would they go the extra mile? It’s simply lack of love because they don’t care enough. So hatred and love is relative too. The shooting happen because the decision makers love more people that could have died than the one in the airplanes. Which is very understandable.

The same way we can argue that terrorists do not hate us, they simply love their own gene pool survival and respect so much they prefer to kill us. Well, that depends on how we define hate and love then, which is getting too complex without math.

Knowing whether people love you or hate you, and how much they do, is essential. Underestimating hatred can be catastrophic.

Written in front of concentration camp is a writing “Arbeit macht frei”. Jews didn’t realize that the Nazi hated them so much. They think the Nazi are some body that can be worked out. So they surrendered their gun. They comply with the laws. And they’re death as predicted by anyone that understand true human nature of getting in each others’ way.

People of Baghdad surrendered to Mongol. They didn’t realize how much hatred, or intensive to hurt, Mongol’s have against those who do not surrender early.

Again whether hatred is justified or not will be a different issue. Usually those masked heavily as love are the one least justified.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Do High IQ People Make Better Strategy?

No.

I know for sure because I am one.

What I often observe is high IQ people arrogantly believe that they are correct even on objects they do not know. Normal IQ people are often equipped with good guides. It could be their peers. It could be their own emotion. Those 2 guides are what high IQ people often do not follow.

High IQ is often smart on so many areas. Because they’re smart on so many ideas they think they’re smart on all areas too even though the don’t study. Then they don’t get rich, they fail to reproduce, and they either keep feeling that they’re somehow successful, or blame the world for being unfair much latter.

What I see again and again is that high IQ people simply follow their own strange idea that’s false. Then they’re wrong and then they blame the world for being unfair, even though they face the misfortune because of their own choosing.

I don’t blame them. They’re right. They’re correct. There is a difference between being correct, happy, and successful. All those are different things.

Like every losers, it’s so easy to let our creativity works against our success. Rather than blaming our own action which we could have changed, we can easily claim that we are morally superior rather than strategically messed up. And the higher the IQ, the easier it is for them to do this, till they realized and accept that they really are wrong.

Truth is often complicated. And facts where we can deduce truth are often hidden, replaced by lies. Those lies are often what high IQ people used as guidance for their reasoning, often toward catastrophic result.

This may not sound as weird as it seems.

I’ll give you an example.

Recently I’ve heard some guy put $400k money in Century bank. The Century bank went bankrupt on one of the biggest bank scandal in Indonesia. He lost his deposits, and I’ve heard many commit suicide.

To add the insult, to avoid guaranteeing the depositors, government pay up some safety fund that goes to some thieves. I think it goes around $600 billion. It’s a crisis of the century.

People complain about paying our officials high salary

Any employers should know that the true cost of hiring people should include the cost catastrophic mistakes they make. Not to mention how many of those “mistakes” do not hurt and can often be profitable for those making it.

What we know:
Depositing money in bank is safe. We in fact swallow lower interests in exchange of that safety.

The truth is:
Depositing money in a bank is very unsafe. Nothing is safe except our own understanding.

Ah.. but the fairy tales is guarded by layers and layers of lies. Don’t we have a government guarantee for those deposited funds.

No. What happen is after the fact is happening, the government argues that due to Century’s higher interest rate, the deposits shouldn’t count as deposits and hence shouldn’t be guaranteed.

Make sense? No. Of course not. Is this what those depositors have in mind when they deposited their money. No. Obviously no.

Okay, what can we learn here:
1. World is unfair.
2. Justification for world affairs often doesn’t make sense.

Tough.

That’s reality.

If you ask David Copperfield, how the hell he made Liberty Statue disappear, he too would say something that doesn’t make sense. He would say, “Ah, I teleported the statue somewhere else, then I build a new one in a blink of an eye.”

Of course that doesn’t make sense. The same goes for religions, morality, our sense of justice, our politically correct reason to prohibit prostitution, etc. None of those make sense. How the hell on one hand we have freedom of religion and on the other hand some guy demand many goes to jail for offending religious moral? Those justifications don’t make sense. They never are.

Because they’re not true.

However a high IQ people will simply follow his logic and follow their understanding based on those false assumptions. “How could, I have known,” they said, “Government clearly stated that they will guarantee deposits. Now this totally doesn’t make sense justification. Everyone else is an idiot and I suffer.”

It’s true they’re wrong. They’re not an idiot though. They are wrong strategically, at your expense.

To understand something that makes sense, you need a correct theory based on truth in a sense of what’s really going on. That theory is based on a more correct assumption and those assumptions are hidden.

Here is a correct theory. Any powerful entities do not need justice and honor to persuade the population to submit to their will. They need only illusion of justice and honor.

Often, being truly honorable is costly. Just like honoring commitment to guarantee deposited funds. However, not maintaining illusion of honor will also be costly because government wants you to put your money on Indonesian banks. So everybody, including all of us, sort of want to have the cake and eat it too. Why not?

And hence, a fairy tales need to be invented to justify acting dishonorably without losing a lot of reputation.

The majority of the population is not very smart to see the problem, and to be frank, they’re not really interested. It’s not their problem. They don’t have $400k to be stored somewhere. Often they’re benefited by the problem.

So it is natural then to understand that storing money in a bank is actually very risky. It is also very understandable to see that government will not pay and will simply find a reason not to pay.

The problem is, do you need to lose your whole life time earning first before you know that?

Were you smart enough, you would probably have joined the corruptions and earn huge. Again, it’s just facts.

Facts, that normal IQ people know. High IQ people often have high paying occupations (or think that they will get one) in private sectors they do not even look for opportunities there. Till it’s too late. Then they cry unfair.

Do we need to be evil to be successful? No. However in unfair countries that defy meritocracy and free market, yes. That’s virtually all countries on some aspects. As sure as I know that there is no way you can be a millionaire productively or honestly if you’re born in North Korea, I can tell you this. Part of you, just got to screw somebody up so you can get ahead.

By the way, the statement above works at least in a sense. In a sense, that’s actually a theorem.

Even if the world is fair, normal IQ people can still outperform high IQ people. They stick on one thing they do it well. That’s it.

If you really want to use your rational mind, please at least use correct theory. That means learning a LOT. Truth is not simple and often hidden. The simpler truth where we can derive a lot of facts are well hidden when it comes to those what truly matter. If you don’t learn, you’re in a great danger of making major mistakes.

Even Zhuge Liang, known as the smartest guy in the world, is rumored to have an ugly wife. So what has he truly achieved really?

Speaking of girls, I remember how I ignored an advice that women prefer the rich. I simply thought it was wrong. Then I made major mistakes in my life. Then I know I am the one that’s wrong. Then I ended up writing a book, http://genepoolsurvivalguide.com so others do not make the same mistakes. Guess what, the book don’t sale. No body believes me.

At the end, rational people often lose, and they understandably cry that life is unfair because it is. If only I can help them realizing it earlier I could have helped a lot of people. But they’re smart. They won’t listen to me. Then what? I can’t save them.

The path to salvation don’t change much across millennia. We would expect that we got that hard wired in our emotion, if only we listen.

The same way, normal people do make better strategies based on those proven hard wired preferences.

For programmer though, hire a high IQ. This is something not even high IQ people would agree, but many normal IQ people that have worked with lots of programmers would obviously know.

Incoming search terms:

  • Copperfield has a high iq
  • do people with high iq often commit suicide?
  • people with high iq are ugly

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

DA Effectively Rules the Nation When We Have Too Many Laws

http://www.iamnotguilty.org/newsupdates.htm

By the way, I am seeing a pattern here. Correct me if I am wrong. DA can choose which case to pursue right? It is often to his interest (or his conscience interest) to pursue cases that match his political agenda. In a sense, DA makes the law because he can choose which laws he wants to pursue. It’s like recent Wendy’s article where DA refuses to convict rape because the woman has had an abortion. Also DA refuses to prosecute false rape accusation because they he wants to punish free sex.

For example, it is possible that the DA hate this businessman for committing 2 heinous evil.
1. Importing meat. Delicious one I must add
2. Rich

The problem is those 2 are not a crime so they pick something else. It’s just like Al Capone.

Now he wants you to be guilty for something. So there goes lacey act. The idea is it’s illegal to import wild life that is harvested in violation of another country’s law if:
1. A law is broken. Including footlings laws. In many countries laws are informal. Laws are just there so someone bribe the judge.
2. The law is made to protect environment. Well I wonder why judges do not require juries to proof this beyond reasonable doubt first. It seems that the box vs clear plastic bag is there to protect honduran’s job.
3. The defendant know or should have known that they’re breaking the law. I wonder how do we proof that in court given that honduran high court believe that no law has been violated. If even honduran attorney general don’t think it’s a law, how the hell an american importer “should have known” that he is breaking a law.

The businessman get slapped because he breaks honduran law, which implies that he breaks lacey act, which implies that he breaks some laws, which implies that the act of importing is a crime, which implies money laundering, and conspiracy, and whatever.

I wish DA were this creatives against thieves and fraudsters.

I guess I talked too much already. But seriously I see a recurring pattern. In my country as well as yours.

http://www.angelfire.com/stars4/justiceforkirstin/Kirstin_s_Story/kirstin_s_story.html

A woman successfully defend with knife against a potential rapist. Then she got convicted of another unrelated crime of someone else that cut off the penis of of someone else in some ritual. The only similarity between the woman’s act and the charge against her is that she confessed that she stab her attackers in the groin. No DNA links, eyewitness, etc.

However, some more comprehensive read will show the real reason why she get convicted of murder. She’s a stripper. Somebody just want to punish those people and they just need a reason.

Wow. Scary ha?

This is a similar pattern that explains why consensual crimes are well, crime.

Women pick another male. Obviously someone want to prevent that. Fuck, I am bored with this topic already.

Let’s try another thing. Some people have fun with drug. Well, somebody just have to make that illegal. After all if people can be happy through unapproved ways then they are less easy to screw. Politicians need to starve people out of happiness if they want easier control and bigger bribe. So marijuana just have to be illegal. Well, I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rational_scale_to_assess_the_harm_of_drugs_%28mean_physical_harm_and_mean_dependence%29.svg

Man. Those things are not even as dangerous as cigarette.

I just see patterns. Perhaps for once I just want to see things the way they are. Not as good as evil but as of what really is going on.

I mean libertarian do not want power. Well, maybe we’re the one that’s wrong. Maybe power is the real wealth. Maybe we’re like commies that claim that wealth is evil and end up poor. The same way, libertarian feel that power is wrong and end up week. Then get screwed and fucked over. Then bitch about it. Not very responsible isn’t it?

Fuck that. I wanna be dictators. To hell with right of others. Might makes right. It’s all part of the game. No productivity don’t magically turn into right until  you have power to enforce that right. Nothing is. It’s just fact.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Making Things go Wrong

This case is slightly different. The laws are not related. However, selective enforcement of laws are made to encourage things to “go wrong” when certain acts are done.

After all, no body can, in a sense, prohibits anything. All we can do is to make things “go wrong” once in a while, when that thing is done.

For example.

1. Bob steal. Bob gets caught. Stealing is illegal. So things can go wrong if you steal. So there will be less thieves.

Notices that many thieves are of course not caught. However, the fact that things can go wrong for YOU when YOU steal discourage people from stealing.

If we think about it, that’s as far as we can go on prohibiting something. All we can do is making things go wrong when somebody do it. We can’t mind control everyone from stealing.

Now here are some more creative samples:

1. AIDS. Many religious group love AIDS. Because that discourages free sex. So many discourage safe sex education besides abstinance.
2. False rape accusation. That discourage free sex too. That is why DA, especially conservative DAs, do not pursue false rape accusations.
3. Charging the women I mentioned with murder. Well, she committed stripping doesn’t she?
4. Making money as in lobster cases. Which is fucked over by so many insane laws, lawsuits, etc. The truth is many people do not want you to be rich. They just want things to go wrong when you do.
5. Marriage. Alimony is one mechanism where things can go really wrong when rich smart males get laid. Subconsciously swing voters want to exterminate superior competitors and hence they want things to go really wrong for rich smart males. Exorbitant alimony is not a problem if you’re poor. Alimony is like a serum that only exterminate the rich, but not the poor.
6. Jail terms tend to hurt the rich more than the poor. That explains why rich people don’t rob banks, because their political cost is higher. Problem starts when jail terms are invoked on low damage crimes that should be punished with fine instead.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

People Maximizing Control

Guys, remember me. The guy that keep insisting that the reason behind marriage is to ration females in equal shares for everyone?

I think I am not quite right.

Saying that would be like saying that the reason why people want to be rich is to buy an ice cream, or a house.

Well, a better analysis is

1. People want to be rich
2. Money by it self DO NOT bring happiness. However, we sort of know that money can be bartered for things that can, like big TV.
3. Obviously buying a house is a big aspect at least for most people but it doesn’t have to be that way.

So the conclusion is people want to be rich. It doesn’t necessarily means they want ice cream.

Well, I was walking with a junkie that eat ecstasy. I then looked up ecstasy and I was surprised. Ecstasy is LESS dangerous than smoking. Also an interview with DEA agent when ecstasy were legal is that the head of DEA wanted to control it anyway BEFORE there is any news that ecstasy are dangerous at all. In fact, how marijuana got illegal is through a TEMPORARY order waiting for some research result. After the research shows that it’s not dangerous, government simply don’t live that temporary ban.

So here is a new theory.

We think humans maximize their wealth. Well, what does wealth do if you’re the Baghdad citizens when slaughtered by Mongols, or Armenians when slaughtered by Turkey, or Jews when slaughtered by Nazi.

Perhaps we need to analyze a different variable. Something the mongols had but the Baghdad citizens didn’t. No, not wealth. Power. Control of wealth. Control, in a sense is a real wealth. Even if you own money, it won’t do you any good is the money is in a thief’s pocket and hence thieves’ control. When I buy McDonald, I am not exchanging ownership of my money for big mac. No. I am exchanging control of my money for control ship of Bic Mac. Who knows who still own the BicMac afterward, who care. It’s in my hand, I eat it.

Not lilke Mc Donald will summon lawyers to get back the BigMac. If it doesn’t, I would argue that I own the big mac. That will somehow have a magical ability to stop the lynching mob from killing me for eating the big mac. Mc Donald, knowing that will not bother disputing my control of the Bigmac. So as you see, ownership is only good as far as it reassert control. Control is then the more “natural” variable.

Just like it’s natural to expect that human want more money, it should be even more natural then to expect that a lot of individuals, VERY SMART INDIVIDUALS, want control.

We can think of that control, like wealth, is an end to itself. Just like when someone rob me, I would think that he did it for the money. Whether he did it because he wants to buy a house or ice cream is kind of far fetches. I would presume that the robbers would use the money for his own benefit rather than mine, quite obviously. More money for him, good for him. Bad for me.

The same way when legislators wants to rob our freedom, we should think, ah, this guy just want to rob more power. For what purpose legislators want to do it is quite irrelevant. I suppose it’ll be something beneficial for the legislators. Quite obviously legislators will talk about how the purpose is to protect my interests, or God’s will, or whatever so he can face less resistant when stealing our freedom. But who care? They’re robbers. And that’s the issue.

We really should stop caring about the bullshit people do to justify their control. We really shouldn’t care. We should tell people that if legislators want to restrict your freedom it’s like they want to steal your money. That’s it. Whether it’s God’s will or for morality or whatever, it doesn’t matter.

Then why do people wants to control sex? The same reason why they want to control drug. They want to maximize their control. With control, come benefit. It could be to ration mates in equal share for everyone as I propose. I still think it’s like 65% of the reason why middle class and swing voters support prohibitions of many consensual sex.

But again it can be anything else. Bribe. Higher legislators salary. Who knows. More control more profit.

You see, marijuana, porn watcher, ecstasy users, and prostitutes are NOT guilty of harming themselves, like everyone always said. They are guilty of being HAPPY without permission from the controllers. Quite obviously the swing voters and legislators are quite pissed. People having fun outside what they allow would undermine their control (or perception of control, which is effectively the effective control).

In other word, just like I was mad that a thief stole my dreamcast 10 years ago, feminazis, religious bigots, enviromentalists, and DEA are mad when you smoke marijuana or have sex outside life long monogamous marriage with women consensually imported from swahili.

I was mad to the thief because I lost my properties because of the thief and hence I want to exterminate thieves. The same way, controllers are mad at happy people because those happy people make the controllers lose something far more precious than dreamcast, namely slaves, which is, of course, us.

What do you guys think?

Oh ya, some people says that path to hell is paved with good intention. I think path to hell is paved with hellish intention. If a dictator control economy and then things went south, it’s not unintended consequences of otherwise benign intention.

The dictator wanted to rob control, which is just like robbing money but somehow less understood intuitively. It’s that simple. Of course it comes at the expense of the robbery victims like usual. And if poor people become plenty, it’s none of the dictator’s concern. If anything, the poor is a good justification for more control. So why not?

Avoid controlling people at all costs.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jewish Refugee Issue

I look around on the wikipedia. I found out that the amount of land seized by some Arab countries from their Jewish citizens are 4 times the area of Israel.

I am no longer sympathetic to these Palestinian cause when I read that. For a country that’s attacked first in 1948 and actually won, Israel is already pretty moderate and reasonable. After all, the proposal of population exchange is economically fair.

Granted, you can’t force people out even though you’re willing to pay the fair market price. But if you do pay the fair market price and the price is fair, or perhaps 20% higher, so what?

For example, when one vermin stole my digital camera, I was angry. But if the vermin then repented and pay me the fair monetary value of goods lost, I would have forgiven the vermins. It doesn’t mean people have right to steal my digital camera even if they’re willing to pay.

However, I wouldn’t go the extra mile chasing small issues. Needless to say the vermin didn’t do that and millions of thieves conviction records are now all over the internet as my revenge to ensure that all those vermins have a hard time getting a job.

Not simply because someone own money they have right to smash your car. But having someone smash your car is a justification to demand monetary compensation, perhaps 2-3 times the value of the car, not justification to wage eternal war.

The russia, for example, raped german women and never return german lost teritories for free. The thing is every body knows that russia is an ass and we don’t bitch about it.

Jews are supposed to be the good guy, the only good guy, and the world bitch about every little thing they did even though the rest of the world are worst. Who among us get land without fighting?

So what the fuck all this middle east war is all about?

Just compensate all refugees from both sides fairly minus “administrative” fee, or whatever, move on, and pay any countries that want to accept any refugees.

I mean, it is not directly comparable I know, but would still be a reasonably “fair” solution. Lebanon for example, treat their Jews fairly and hence shouldn’t have to pay up. They could probably ask for some compensation for the last bombing.

So not a perfect solution, but would reduce it by much. Then little things can be worked out. Perhaps an NAP ensuring that Israel don’t keep getting land through military means no matter how many nukes they have, quite obviously.

Israel accept Jewish refugees for free. The only country in the world that I know of that accept so many refugees so willingly. That greatly solve world refugees problem. Now we just need to have the other side solve the other half of the problem.

I am sure there are plenty of countries that don’t mind accepting 5 million Palestinian refugees if the country got $300 billion. Everything would be very simple if money arrange everything.

By the way, how the hell Palestinian refugees are 5 million anyway, it started out at 800K? Why can’t the Jews outbreed the Palestinians. Ups, they didn’t have my e-book. I get it. But the palestinians didn’t have that either. Kudo for palestinians for being able to practice gene pool survival guide without bother reading it.

Just recently I heard that LGTB conference in Indonesia is canceled because a private party threaten to terrorize it and cops say they cannot guarantee safety. Things get really ugly because in Indonesia you are not allowed to own gun. Even though having conference is legal, it effectively is illegal because of this. So any religious bigots effectively make the rule of the land by objecting.

Somebody just have to kick those religious bigots ass.

Anyway, what would a libertarian solution for this sort of thing be?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

When Vermins Put Gun in Your Head, It’s Too Late?

If you’re as rich as Bill Gates, can you make 1000 kids legally?
If you don’t hurt others, why shouldn’t others hurt you?
If you never hurt your enemies, why should anyone believe you may?
Treat thieves like vermin and they’ll treat us like God, the way we deserve from them!

Tags: , , , ,