Angelina Jolie of course.
And let’s say a woman has that same choice. Would she pick Bill Gates or some homeless guy? Call me shallow. Women still pick me anyone than someone with half my income.
Not very clear cut actually.
There is what people want and what government want. Raising kids, commitment, and determination of fatherhood is what people reasonably want.
What government want is to comply to the will of voters of preventing rich smart males from banging too many hot babes. Getting married means others’ interests will have to influence your decision outside market mechanism. Hence you’re not maximizing your profit. Now that’s what’s wrong according to me.
Many actually defend it. They would argue, correctly that if too many males are single, there will be too many criminal. That’s true. Factually I agree. And that’s all I want to show, what’s the problem really is.
If I ask my feeling who should I choose, obviously wealthy. However, emotion can be misleading.
If I can choose between being wealthy and shagless or being a poor stud, I’d choose studs.
In socialized liberal western civilization being a stud can be FAR more lucrative than being wealthy.
Think about it. I do not enjoy luxury. All I care about entertainment, beside sex, is video games that’s getting cheaper and cheaper. I do not need private yach. I don’t even enjoy parties.
The main reason why I want to be rich is so my kids got good education and opportunity.