Free Market Forever

GDP this single thread opens my eyes on what others think. I probably just concentrate on this thread only. Finally I understand you. Finally I understand why every body got mad at me.

In fact, to my surprise, if there is ANYTHING all these white guys can agree is that the rich shouldn’t breed. To my surprise, the only people that can understand my point of view is the group that I want to get rid the most: muslim fundamentalists.

I know you said the SAME thing several time. I didn’t thought you were serious because you know how ridiculous this is? Do you know that you could be the only person in the world that think having more than 2.1 kids is child abuse? Brat…… Is this a standard libertarian position that it’s immoral to have many kids?

Does GDP, like feminazis, christian priests, nazis, and every body else just pull this out of their ass to justify genocide against the rich?

I guess this is something unique in western civilization isn’t it. Only those so thoroughly indoctrinated by feminazis/cristianity/socialism would think it’s immoral to have more than 2.1, 5, or even 10 kids.

I don’t know where to start where I differ. We do differ a lot.

First I want to get this out of my chess. If you kids can’t do programming, that’s also child abuse. If your kids don’t get all As in schools for math and programming, that’s child abuse. If your kids don’t win tons international competitions, that’s child abuse. In fact, if government say that you are a bad parent because your kids get an AB and that should be illegal, I can understand that, as long as it’s implemented consistently.

But to call someone a child abusers simply he has many kids, it just beyond me. There are kids starving on the street. There are kids that don’t even know who daddy is. AND ALL THAT IS LEGAL.

Yet when a rich smart male want to make many kids, the feminazis will say it’s objectification of women. The christians will say that bible says that all marriage must be within monogamous life long marriage (not in the bible, though I bet they pull that out). The social democrat would say that the rich should pay more for someone else’ kids. If it’s not my cock, and it’s not my sperm, why should it be my money? Conversely, if it’s my money, why shouldn’t it be my genetic copies? Why should it be other males’ blood line?

Is it legal for McDonald to sell tons of high quality product? Of course. Is it legal for some shady restaurant to sell a rotten product? Of course it isn’t. The fact that you mass produce something doesn’t mean it’s low quality. To the opposite, the fact that you can mass produce something that customer wants show that the stuff you produce is actually of high quality.

Do you know that what you’re suggesting is close to genocide? Eugenics often say that some people shouldn’t make any kids. You said that they shouldn’t make more than 2.1. That’s not too far.

And yes eugenics actually kill the superior. Just look at holocaust and armenian genocide.

Say I have 2 kids? You think all of them will get married and produce 2 kids? This expectation that everybody should and would make 2 kids is just the source of all suffering we have now.

And whose idea is it anyway that we should only make as many kids to replace our genes? Should businesses make as much profit just to cover their expense? What’s the limit?

And you’re bringing your own kind to doom. You make KKK looks like a necessary balancing factor. Birth rate is declining in western civilization. Government actually giving cash so the poor breed more kids, which is kind of idiotic. Now who will inherit all those invention and wealth creation white people achieve? The asians?

Forget it, we’re so westernized, we too stop making babies. Only Lee Kwan Yew, president of Singapore got the ball to say that we need to encourage fornication among the rich so they make babies. It’s too politically incorrect no body says that out of fear that we’re not following this great western civilization.

While I admire many aspects of western civilizations, I must say, YOU ARE DEATH WRONG in this. You’re bringing your own doom.

But no. The most fuck up countries actually have high population growth and the best governed countries have the least. The most fuck up people actually have tons of kids but that’s okay because they’re the bad guys. We the good guys have to go extinct. No wonder poverty never ends.

That’s not ideal. That’s not even not ideal. That’s idiotic. Why agree to pick a yoke no one else is picking, and no one else is capable of picking?

Imagine if Donald Trump make 1000 kids and welfare mom makes 1. The next generation, we have 1000 billionaires supporting that 1 kid of welfare mom. We wouldn’t argue so much about welfare is good or bad. It’s not going to be worth arguing anymore.

Another thing that I said in other threat is that you are so crazy you judge people based on absolute rather than relative standard. People poorer, dumber, and less productive than you produce 20 children and get away with it. So why shouldn’t you?

Killing is wrong because we all will be better of if we stop killing each other. But if people kill and get away with it, killing is not wrong, till society learn that they should punish murderers.

The same for making kids. It’s not wrong to leave on welfare from cradle to grave. Just like it’s not wrong to buy tons of gold if an idiot is selling it for $1/kg. What’s wrong is society that’s so insane that it actually encourage the behavior by price pegging and other mechanisms.

Fair is you play by the same rule like everybody else. Moral is if you play slightly better. If you play too much in favor of others against your own self interests, you just shooting your own shoes and will fail to make anyone else better off. What’s the point of being moral then if it has no profit for your self, your family, your allies, and everyone else?

Incoming search terms:

• powered by phpBB abuse