Free Market Forever

I love Capitalism. Stop being Slaves and Take Ownership of Your Life.

Posts Tagged Socialism

What Won’t Work in Fighting Corruption and What May

Mar 24

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

Discover guaranteed proven new safe way you'll love and save money. 

YOU can EASILY Get girls/guys you want if you understand

Why rich smart males do not want to get married and why do unattractive people want everybody to get married?

or you can grab

Gene Pool Survival Guide with How to Learn Math e-Book for Maximum Saving

Written by world's #1 life guru. Also a mensa member that won international math competitions. There are ways to get what you want effectively. The most effective ways are almost always politically incorrect yet done by every winners. Math and common sense can see through important obviously true laws of life that most people will simply deny.

Knows the truth. The truth will, besides getting you laid and rich, set you free.

1. We can’t count on miracles. So if somebody claims that by following certain religious tenets then we can end corruption, that guys just need to show us more evidence just like everyone else. We also can’t count on God doing things God don’t usually do, namely interfering in normal natural order of universe as predicted very accurately by science. That’s assuming God exist in the first place of course.
2. We can’t count on unselfish heroism. First most humans are selfish. Second, those who aren’t selfish sacrifice himself for the sake of others. Those people lessen intensives for all others to play fair.
3. We can’t count on government. Corruption is a lost for the people but is profitable for government official.

10 Girls for Every 1 Guy

So what may work?

1. Free market. Less government less things to corrupt. Also the best and brightest would rather start biz rather than becoming corrupt officials.
2. If you really want redistribution of wealth, you need people to be smart. You may think that atheistic people are dumb at getting to heaven, but they tend to be smarter at accomplishing anything verifiable and disprovable because that’s where they put their brain is. That’s why Denmark can practice socialism with minimum distortion. That’s why in most religious country the one getting rich is the religious leaders rather than the people. Hate atheists if you may, but listen to them.

Incoming search terms:

  • free market Denmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why World Can Never Be Truly Libertarians

Mar 14

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

Say you lived in an anarchic country. A bunch of mobs wanted to rob your money. You’re a libertarian. What you would do is to pay another mobs to defend you right? Not simply because you’re right that mobs will defend you. You need to pay up.

Say you lived in a litigious country. A bunch of mobs wanted to sue you for your money. You’re a libertarian. What you would do is to pay lawyers to defend you right? Not simply because you’re right means lawyers will defend you for free. You need to pay up.

Say you lived in a democratic country. A bunch of voters vote to tax you. You’re a libertarian. Well, it’s the same game. You just need to somehow persuade enough voters to be on your side. It may not be free.

You can:
appease voters such as in socialism
appease dictators, corrupt officials, and politicians.
appease religious leaders
steal money from the people and use that to appease dictators, officials, politicians, and religious leaders
move to another country. If your country is already the best, you’re asking too much. If no other countries want to accept you, something is probably wrong with you.
bitch all your life how the world is unfair

And yes those are part of the games. If people resort to force, then force is part of the game. In fact one of the best argument against socialism is that those running the fastest can and often will hit the hardest. As free market grow big and people gets richer and richer, I start seeing that a little socialism MAY be better than the other options. The question is how small, and whether those appeasements beget more appeasements or more freedom. Some people can’t be appeased. Some can.

I am not suggesting any new thing. Just do what’s work and stop bitching about how the world are not purely libertarian. Let’s just admit that free market works too well in bringing prosperity. Gini index is like spring. It’s just happen that when the top gets richer, they value money less they’d be willing to pay more to get people on their side.

If you don’t agree with me, fine. Come up with better ideas that work better. Just don’t bitch and blame the world. That’s not going to get us anywhere. If you want to bitch, that’s fine too. But let’s just say that I see many better ways.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Should We Force All Countries to Become Democracies?

Dec 3

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

Recently Indonesian government demand that Jogja Governer should be elected.

As of now, the descendant of ancient Jogja King is always the governor. He disagree. That one is not very surprising. Here is what’s surprising. Most Jogjan diagrees too.

Jogjakarta, which is the only monarch within Indonesia is the most free, most liberal, and one of the most economically advance regions in Indonesia. That king, so far, governed well. Not to mention that the king supported Indonesian’s independence against the dutch. There would be no Indonesia without Jogja monarch and now a country that the kingdom help build will destroy it.

I lived in Jakarta, which is the capital, and I feel like stealing money because all the money often has to go through Jakarta first.

However, Jogja is prosperous despite not being the capital.

How come that one monarch govern his country well beyond the other democratically elected regions?

Well, democracy has plus and minus. The plus is people are not too stupid. We don’t need a smart government, we need something that’s not too stupid and democracy sort of works. Another plus is you don’t get more power simply because you’re more violent. That greatly demotivate people from usurping the thrones by, say, civil war. Of course there are many pluses on democracy. We always get a top dog for the executive branch rather than idiots that happen to be the son of the last emperor is another thing.

No system is perfect.

Democracy is ruled by whoever make the most kids. We know how that leads to in US. That’s a serious misalignment of interest.

What about immigration? Imagine. Say I am a socialist, then I come to US for job, then I vote for socialism. What will happen? I effectively got a “stake” on a country by simply coming there. That’s what democracy is right? Voting right for population (not citizenship). Yea in US you got to be citizen first, but there is a strong pressure to turn anyone there into citizen as if it’s their right. No wonder well managed countries then counter that with another inefficient strategy, preventing immigration. Now I am not saying it’s right. But sometimes there is a deeper problem that should be cured first before we cure symptoms.

Dubai do not have that problem. 80% of Dubai population do not have citizenship. Is Dubai bad? Well those workers get paid more do they? Because those immigrants will never rule Dubai’s ruling sultan never has problems with allowing them to come in.

What about Jogja? Well there is a reason why Indonesians are not very rich yet. Most of the people stupidly opposes individual freedom.

If Jogja becomes democracy, Jogja’s prosperity would simply attract a lot of people. Most of those people do not like freedom as much as Jogja’s citizen. Then those people can vote. Jogja then will become just like every other region in Indonesia.

However, if Jogja is still a monarch, people that come to Jogja will not have power to change the status quo of freedom. Jogja will still be prosperous. Other regions will then follow. Those who do come to Jogja will be those who like the way the king govern. Which is another important point. You don’t like it, well just move out.

The same issue is happening in Bali. Balinese do not like muslim immigrants. Why? Well Australian tourists are sunbathing totally naked in Bali. The balinese do not mind at all. After all they get paid a lot and those tourists are their main income. Also those female white tourists are quite hot. I wouldn’t complain here.

Like Jogja, Bali is one of the most prosperous region in Indonesia.. Then prosperity attract Javanese in large number. Then the muslims refer to Indonesian laws against pornography demands those tourists to wear thongs.

I got nothing against Muslims and Javanese. It’s just that as long as we’re richer, they should be more like us than the other way around. Democracy combined with lax immigration, could result in things going the other way around.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Land of The Peeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee And Place for the Balllessssssssssssssssssssss

Nov 18

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

Quote:
i like the description you gave of ind. it sounds similar to china as well. :-) when i looked for my secretary i told her beforehand if she would resist if i wanted her to provide other ‘special’ things hehe.

ha ha ha. In US you can’t do that. Some peee country. Land of the peeeeeeeeeeeeee……

Now I see why people love communism. How else can we abuse our workers and our women? Under capitalism? Think again. Even if prostitution is free, it’s like what, $1k for a massage section done by ugly hoes?

I don’t beat up my wife. I think I should spank her nekkid ass till she do her job better. It’s just that she often hit back . Christians….. In what country does that beardy talk again? What was the religion again? There is a reason why the word hau (good) in china, is women kneeling under a house (sucking cock). Next time, I won’t have a wife. I’ll just have secretaries.

Wooden pony ordered. Honey, look what I bought for you..

Looks like communism has an upside. The best and brightest do not get money, but get something far more important. Powah to oppress the mass. Long live karl marx. Way to go. Great system you have here.

Yea, keep voting for socialism commies. I put up enough with all this socialist nonsense and is going to take advantage of “the game” or whatever you put on my plate. Winners will always be winners anyway.

Looks like in Europe, it’s the womyn that got balls.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Are the Rich Less Generous

Jan 7

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

The problem is not people are less generous. People are MORE generous now than they are thousands of years ago. In ancient time, the poor got only 2% of money in Muslim countries.

Now we pay 30% income tax most of which goes into wealth redistribution. What else, given that the market can provide far superior service more efficiently anyway. So we are 15 times more generous.

World GDP is 300 times it was 200 years ago. Human race is 300 times richer.

If we have the same number of fuck ups now than we have 200 years ago, non of those fuck ups will be “poor” by 1800 standard.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is the fuck ups, irresponsible, lazy, stupid, socialists bigots out breed the prudent, smart, diligent and hard working. The problem is we got smart people like HaRRo that are too willing to sacrifice himself in altar of socialism to fed the parasites. Sorry HaRRo. We got to repent.

Anyone opposing freedom want to enslave others. Yielding to their kind is like cutting our own hand throwing it to lions hoping the lions will become vegetarian. If anything, the lions will just breed and breed and kill us.

If you run the fastest you simply have to show that you too can hit the hardest.

I love poor people. Many of them work hard for me and we both make a lot of money. None of those that work hard for me work as hard as me though. But well, we’re getting somewhere.

It’s the mindset that’s wrong. We encourage the poor to breed by subsidizing those that make kids. When subsidy is given, supply and demand curve no longer meet creating surplus of humans, causing unemployment giving rise to more justification for bigger government in never ending vicious poverty cycle.

Just pay anyone that don’t have kids and legalize commercial sex so the best brightest richest (like our mods) can knock up all the hot babes. Then encourage porn so no ugly women get laid. Hell those ugly feminists can always enjoy their right becoming astronauts, programmers, scientists, or some grenade thrower in the front line anyway. I totally support affirmative action for all womyn that want to throw grenade in the front line, if they’re ugly.

Within 1 generation, all kids will have rich smart dad and hot sexy mom. No need to resort to violent to “exterminate” those we deem inferior.

But even those benign peaceful method is politically incorrect. We’re like gladiator being forced to kill each other by our leaders with their irrational faith based “morality”.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Who Wants What?

Jan 6

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

That is precisely correct

Want of freedom is universal among those who can give better offer, more competitive, and hence want consumers to be free to choose.

Just like want of meritocracy is universal, among the productive.

The same way, want of sacrifice is also universal among those who want to sacrifice others. Want of control is universal among those who want to enslave others. Want of socialism is universal, among parasites. Want of religion is universal among those who want to blame others based on nonsense.

I do not think you understand the concept of a military objective.

LOL … perhaps you misunderstand what SHOULD be a military objective and what shouldn’t.

There is no reason Vietnamese could not live in a democracy.  Vietnam could have easily transitioned from an Authoritarian Developmental Regime to a Developmental Democracy. That’s like Jackie Chan saying Chinese people are not ready to live in a democracy and need to be controlled.

That’s about as stupidly Western as it gets. “There’s really no reason at all why you should not understand that this is wrong.” See how well that works?

The military does not choose the objective, and I have been talking strictly in a military perspective, so what should be a military objective is a good talking point, but not what we were discussing. The thought is not Western, want of Freedom is universal. We could go on forever like you said earlier.

Incoming search terms:

  • authoritarian developmental regime

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is Marriage Obsolette

Sep 29

Posted by admin in Uncategorized | No Comments

Anything endorsed by government outside prohibition of fraud and force is most likely obsolete, from traditional market to public education and to marriage. If it’s not obsolete, government does not need to endorse it. The market would promote whatever system that would provide the best option for the market player.

In detail:

In ancient time marriage serves some legitimate market purpose. Rich males want to inherit their wealth. They need to know which kid is his biological child. Of course. I wouldn’t want to work hard all my life if I ended up giving money to someone else’ kids.

In ancient time, there is only one way for a male to know for sure whether the kid is his. He can only knows that by ensuring that the kids’ mother mate only with him. That then becomes marriage.

Society also has legitimate interests. Imagine if we have a child with no known father. Are we going to let the kid starve to death? I wouldn’t do it to a kitten. But if we help the kid that’s not victimless. Tax payer ended up paying. Also it encourages some males (if not eventually most) to just make kids and don’t bother supporting it. So in ancient time, requiring marriage does have a reasonable cause.

Now, those purposes mean less.

1. We can always know who the kid is by blood or DNA testing. Far more practical than say stoning wifes that mate with other man.
2. Marriage increase, rather than decrease, a male chance from having his wealth ended up supporting others’ kid. If you are not married and your mate produce a kid, you are not responsible for the child support. However, if you are married and your wife commits adultery, you are still responsible for child support. Also huge amount of socialism in all countries means that most of your earning will end up supporting those who make many kids anyway in the form of free education, free healthcare, free whatever.

Marriage also has one important aspect. This aspect will never get obsoletes. Life long monogamous marriage pretty much ration females (or males) in equal share for everyone. Hence we would expect many people that can’t get a high quality mate, will do their best to ensure that marriage is the norm.

As countries get richer, the males in those countries will have easier time to attract a mate. Those males tend to be more liberal and let the women choose, like in French or Japan, where women can walk naked on the street. The more a country is poor, the more restriction that their government will need to keep the peace. In Afgan, women can’t even work. In many poor countries women clits are cut of.

Imagine if women are as free in Afgan as they are in Japan, for example. All those women would have flaunted their naked tits openly and ended up marrying American tourists rather than local males. Quite predictably, most Afganistan males would condemn that.

If any of you want to help eliminating all governments endorsement for marriage institution (and hence making marriage truly obsolete), let me know how. I am all for it. Or please point me to a right forum. Let’s not bitch about the world. Either change our self to match the world or change the world to be a better place for us. Whichever is easier.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,