Free Market Forever

May 6, 2012

Humans are Selfish and We Need to Know It

Many ideologies and religions are believable because people THINK strangers love them.

They simply overestimate those loves. Let’s face it socialism is selfishness. It’s the lazy selfishly try to rob the productive. Yet it’s packaged as love to appeal to the mass.

Feminazism is selfishness. It selfishly demand everyone to ignore beauty and naturally promoted by the ugly. Yet it’s packaged as love by claiming that the best jobs and deals, where beauties matter most, are too degrading.

Drug prohibition is mainly selfishness. It selfishly max out government control on what we can eat. Yet it’s packaged as love as if the world care your kids die.

Religion is selfishness. It’s there to maximize power of religious leaders and their followers. Yet it’s packaged as love as they actually care you go to heaven. They don’t.

Only capitalism is honest. And yes it’s selfish too. But it’s honest because it doesn’t need to lie. We will all be better off if free market take care of everything.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB balanced politics
  • powered by phpBB define legal terms
  • powered by phpBB human breeding
  • powered by phpBB show up
  • powered by phpBB competition nature photography in ohio
  • powered by phpBB how to earn money at
  • powered by phpBB government stimulus check
  • powered by phpBB allegiance health
  • powered by phpBB christian art competitions
  • powered by phpBB supply distribution

April 29, 2012

Greatest Lie

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — admin @ 10:01 am

Humans greatest lie is not God.

Humans greatest lie is love. There isn’t much of it among strangers and humans grossly over estimate it.

Faith in religion is but a minor stupidity compared to an even greater stupidity that cause it. A greater stupidity is faith in humanity itself.

Humans, believing humanity, have a hard time understanding that so many people would believe a false thing, hence thinking that what the crowds believe must be true.

The truth is humans will much more eagerly embrace falsehood that benefit them compared to truth that hurt them. That’s how we got religions. Religion is just one of the symptom.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB effects of video games on children
  • powered by phpBB european american arms
  • powered by phpBB european beauty
  • powered by phpBB managed care definition
  • powered by phpBB play free games
  • powered by phpBB free family
  • powered by phpBB marriage
  • powered by phpBB canadian currency converter
  • powered by phpBB science resources
  • powered by phpBB yahoo video search
  • powered by phpBB dying in your arms
  • powered by phpBB people person
  • powered by phpBB stimulus check taxable
  • powered by phpBB stupid games
  • powered by phpBB gardening when it counts
  • powered by phpBB boxing supplies
  • powered by phpBB buy video games in the us
  • powered by phpBB first regional
  • powered by phpBB free search engines people
  • powered by phpBB psychology programs
  • powered by phpBB science physics
  • powered by phpBB the strangers true story
  • powered by phpBB rabbit society
  • powered by phpBB western regional
  • powered by phpBB physics dictionary
  • powered by phpBB legal employment
  • powered by phpBB lcd television australia
  • powered by phpBB how to solve physics problems
  • powered by phpBB goverment stimulus check
  • powered by phpBB employment law
  • powered by phpBB basic physics concepts
  • powered by phpBB basic american foods job loss

March 27, 2012

Psychopaths and Effective Psychopaths

Clayton -  apparently he’s not actually arguing that most people are psychopaths, but rather that the results of their actions are akin to those of psychopaths.

That is correct. I mean David for example, killed 100 palestines to collect the foreskins. War and corruption can be thought of as psychopathy too. Yet 99% of politicians would do it if they can get away with it. Genocide, war, socialism, big government, are a reflection of voters’ effective psychopathy. In fact, a person doesn’t have to be a psychopath to act as a psychopath. If responsible productive acts like making honest money are punished and unproductivity is rewarded, humans are “forced” to be psycophats.

Say you want to be a responsible husband. Get rich first then get laid. Chance is you pay huge income tax. After that you have to keep paying lifetime alimony and child support to kids that’s not even yours. The amount is set proportional to man’s wealth. If you just breed and knock up babes like irresponsible studs, you get rewarded and government would pay for those. What men would not be a psychopath in their sexual life? Losers… In fact, I think being a psychopath is a normal, natural, or even moral answer to injustice. Of course, once the world is just, it’s to your best interest to be productive.

However, the idea that humans are indeed actually psychopaths may  not be too wrong either.

As someone point out, all those paths are always minority. But they’re not minority because people are not like them. They are minority because social illness is unnaturally defined so that the majority is not categorized as ill.

Delusion for example, should include religions. However, delusional is defined in a way that popular religions don’t count.

The same way most humans share the same traits with most psychopaths. Most humans are selfish. Most humans will choose an act that profit him $100 even if that means many others lose $1000000. Most humans will just justify that immoral acts rather than stop doing it if incentive is high enough. Most strangers would renege on their contracts if they will get away with it. But the definition of psychopaths are carefully defined not to include most people even though most people would do the same thing a psychopath would do under most circumstances.

Look at definition of exploitation for example. It can naturally mean all non consensual interaction or it can naturally mean all taking advantage of other people, consensual or not. Feminazis carefully define exploitation to mean women having sex to paying males, irrelevant of consent or not. This very unnatural definition makes arguments very difficult.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB what is greater than god more evil than
  • powered by phpBB political books
  • alimony money slave
  • powered by phpBB ball honeys
  • powered by phpBB cnn money
  • powered by phpBB feminist art movement
  • powered by phpBB free government grant

February 24, 2012

Is there any formal school of ethics that justify cruel treatment of people?

I must be missing something. Through all ages, most philosophy, especially those that answer ethics, allow and encourage cruel acts against other human being. It’s the norm. It’s not the exception.

We like to believe that it’s only done on exceptional cases. Still, those exception is more of a norm than exception.

In fact, libertarianism is the only school of ethics that do not justify cruelty, at least not consensually, nor encourage cruelty to others. Exceptions are arguable like in cases of shooting burglars slowly to death. But the burglars ask for it so it’s like consensual right? Okay just kidding but you got the point.

It’s as if the very reason why philosophy and religion is made is to justify cruel acts.

Normally we retaliate against cruel acts. But then, ah, through some long twisted philosophy of ethics, we start thinking oh it’s justified, it’s okay.

We see people getting tortured to death. Well according to legalism, a school of ethic, it’s the law of the land. So it’s okay. That sort of thing.

And that’s I think the real origin of ethic. Some tyrants sponsoring thought that justify his cruelty so he can stay in powah.

In fact, one central theme of taoism is that even robbers cause limited damage. But evil in the name of truth (=awesome ethic) has no limit.

Perhaps the issue is whether the school of ethic is formal. Perhaps formal means major. Well these look formal enough to me:

Legalism obviously.

If it’s the law, it’s okay.

It justify killing, strangling, crucifying, castrating, slaughtering to 9th degree of family. What doesn’t it justify?

Religion is another.

Religions should count as a school of ethic too, if not the main ones.

It justify war, genocide, slavery, just read book of exodus in bible. Just look how Taliban works.

Why? Well, God says so. Hmmmm. mmmmkay

Militarism is another.

It justify shooting other people. Yes those are technically enemy. But then again most guys in Hiroshima weren’t soldiers. So are most women raped by rusian army. So were jews that died during holocaust.

C’mon guys. They just want to kill. Then they come up with some philosophy why it’s cool to kill.

Now let’s count some indirect circumstances.

We need food. Say you prohibit someone from getting food in any practical way. You effectively force him to starve right?

Imagine if you said okay you can get food but you can’t pay for it. Well that’s still as good as forcing him to starve because unless you are very charming then you most likely can’t get food without paying.

So if we can include any philosophy that may not justify cruelty but justify acts that obviously lead to cruel outcome and use felonious murder legal doctrine logic we should include:

Trade restriction-ism

It’s a school of ethic. It basically says that some consensual trade is not ethical and hence must be prohibited. What’s the result?

I think all evil in the world stem largely due to trade restrictions. Without trade restrictions we can be rich by helping others. Trade restrictions give more happiness to those who are in power than those who are productive. Basically profit in trade restriction-ism goes to those who have the power to restrict trade.

So people try to be in power more and act cruelly to others so they are feared.

World wars would not have happened if globalization was already the norm. Politicians cannot seize people money if the market regulate everything. Whitney Houston and Michael Jackson would have been alive if ganja is legal.

Everything we hear are just bullshit after bullshit to make us believe the fairy tales that some consensual trade is evil.

That’s the heart of evil.

The most notorious trade restrictionism is

Socialism

It’s a school of ethic. It says that wealth is not ethical

One notorious trade restriction-ism is socialism. It justify government intervention in economy that obviously lead to really really messed up famine and poverty. During chinese “great leap” or whatever, chinese eat their own kids because they are starving. Such is the evil of government’s intervention in economy.

The worst of the worst of trade restriction-ism is

The #1 super cruel philosophy in the world is, drum roll (looks like it’s going to be my last answers before I am kicked out from this site)

feminazism

It’s a major school of ethic. It says that some/all commercialized consensual acts for sex is not ethical.

It restrict trade and commercialization of the most important aspect of our life, sex.

Most males want to get laid. Imagine if you said you can’t have sex. Then you cruelly forced him into a shageless life. Imagine if you said you can’t have sex unless you pay for it? Well unless you’re Brad Pitt, it’s hard to charm women without “consideration”.. Yes you can offer marriage (I wonder why) but marriage sucks because it’s infested by non market force such as governments’ trade restriction.

Feminazism hurt the interest of hot babes even more than males.

Think about it. So many women are stoned, killed, and beaten up in Afghanistan. Obviously many of those women prefer to move out to other countries where women are treated better.

Feminists prohibit anyone from helping those women out. Yes, they said that you are prohibited from helping women move out only if the woman is going to have sex for money.

That’s still the same thing. What can that girl offer beside sex to persuade others to provide costly help for her? Even western girls often have sex with photographer for stardorm. It’s what girls do.

So many kids are born out of poverty because their dad are poor. Yet feminazis successfully make sugar babies illegal. So many hot babes cannot get paid by richer males. Those women ended up marrying. Marriage must be monogamous. In other word, every male will tend to get one under marriage system no matter how poor or violent he is.

Result is obvious. Women ended up with violent assholes that beat her up.

The only thing good about feminazism is that they demand women to fight on front line. Sure. We should encourage those dikes to do so.

February 21, 2012

Truth vs Beliefs

It’s easy for most of us to believe that truth is all that matters. It doesn’t matter what some crazy nuts believe. All that matter is truth.

Imagine if you’re a defendant in court. Which one matters more? The truth whether you indeed rape or murder the girl, or whatever the judge and jury believe?

Which one will land you in jail?

Now look at how politics work.

There is nothing in anti-drug laws that specify that prohibited drugs must be dangerous. There is nothing in anti-prostitution laws that specify that prostitution must be promiscuous or forced. Anti-women trafficking laws specifically add clauses that trafficking is still prohibited irrelevant of consent.

Yet most people believe that all prohibited drugs are more dangerous than the legal ones. People also believe that all prostitution and women trafficking are not consensual and hence less preferable than the legal marriage. Quite often their beliefs are what matters.

To further add complication, beliefs are often very useful for those who are in power. Those who are in power then have strong incentive to promote the beliefs irrelevant of truth. Take a look the belief that all humans are equal and have right to live for example. There is no proof for that. Yet, most of us, including me, would want to embrace that for obvious reason. We don’t want to die. Also if we end up killing each other we are all worst off.

This is too complicated. Few if any individuals in ancient time see that we will kill each other unless we recognize right not to be killed. Till today, most people don’t know. Most people are not aware that most people live, simply because it’s illegal to kill them.

Even if most of us do not want to kill for money, once we see too many people do it and get away with it, we too will do it. The main reason why we don’t kill is simply because we believe that killing doesn’t pay.

In ancient time, religions give reason to promote beliefs that simply don’t have proof but beneficial to many anyway.

Many things are not that benign.

We sort of think that most interaction are consensual. We sort of see that prohibition against consensual acts are the exception rather than the norm. Few of us see that’s it’s simply the interest of those who are in power, rather than the interest of the consenting parties, that are behind laws against consensual acts.

Put your self in the shoes of judges. Which way the judges care more? Truth or bribe? It’s easy for us to blame judges. But aren’t we like that? When we vote, do we care about justice or interests? Very often it’s simply our interests too, which we pretend to be justice.

It’s simply not to the best interest of religious leaders to let their followers to interpret their religions freely or change religion.

The same way it’s not to the best interests of those with less to offer to simply legalize all consensual transactions. Doing so would force them to compete viciously against those with far better offers than them. That often lead to extinction.

We don’t expect most voters to want free trades, which mean they are losing their job. We don’t expect poorer males would want sugar babies legalized, which mean the rich will just get all the girls. The same way we don’t expect ugly feminists to support legalization porn, in which prettier girls get all the attention. We also won’t expect the poor not to support nationalized health care or lower tax. It simply isn’t going to happen.

One solution is to embrace freedom all the way and fight for our freedom, or look at reality and adapt to it. That’s what tyrants and grafters do. They lied, they cheat, they enslave, but what’s the alternative? The alternative is to be lied to, to be cheated to, and to be non-consensually enslaved by the will of the ignorant majority.

To further add to the complexity, beliefs do change reality to the same, if not more degree, than the other way around. If people believe something, they bet on it, they count on it, then they want it, and they make that happens.

We believe that drugs are dangerous, so it becomes really dangerous with mafias, gangs, and cops shooting each other over it. Countries that legalize drugs will be vilified for the obvious reason. They show that drug is not dangerous and that means offending the beliefs of many with interests invested on drugs prohibition.

Many believe that God exist and is on their side, and the world behave as if God is really on the emperor’s side with everyone fears rebelling against emperors. We believe that prostitution can’t be consensual and what do you think a pimp will do if he knows that the punishment for him will be the same anyway whether the girls consent or not?

Because our beliefs, though false, are even useful to us, and because beliefs are self-fulfilling, we tend to maintain our beliefs irrelevant of anything.

Now, I wonder if I can learn more about it? NLP?

Incoming search terms:

  • www free market for ever com

February 19, 2012

Pray Change Beliefs

Pray change beliefs. Beliefs change betting strategies. Betting strategies change incentives. Incentives change actions. Actions change outcome.

A carpenter figured that out 2000 years before John Nash.

We promote traits that are compatible with our traits and destroy traits that are not. Then all those traits ever “want” is to reproduce.

So in a sense, traits that are common nowadays are “better traits” that make us live in harmony with our friends. Humans are not just greedy and selfish. We also are cooperative, just, and compassionate. What goes around do go around and too evil people simply failed to reproduce. A hermit figured that out 2500 years ago before selfish gene and origins of virtue.

Perhaps there are indeed gems in religions. Ignoring it is a mistake. Letting government infesting it, will be another.

February 12, 2012

Freedom for Women in Afghanistan

I have another idea for oppressed girls from Afghanistan. All we need is a millionaire that want to sponsor that girl and gave her place and a normal job for a year. After 1 year, gave that women a choice. She can choose to

1. Go back to Afghan. We can apologize for wasting their time and replace their 1 year salary of $20.

2. Keep working on any normal job. If they pick this, there could be some “capacity problems” where socialist workers will start bitching about immigrant hot babes taking away all their jobs. Typical western anti immigrant rhetoric. Well, but I bet 99% of them would choose to:

3. Be a sugar baby/wife of some guy should any western males manage to woo them. I suggest becoming a sugar baby rather than becoming a wife because marriage is too infested with religions, state influence, and who knows what. But it’s up to them. We just need to make sure that she is not coerced, or look coerced in any way. We really do not need coercion when competing with poor unshaven cave dwelling wife beating nose cutting Taliban dudes. However, some feminazis may will argue that our offers are non consensual and an exploitation precisely because of that.

4. Taliban discriminates against exhibitionists. Some Afghan women may be a closeted exhibitionists. They could be our next porn star and their movie can be parachuted into Taliban territory with cheap portable movie player as weapon of moral destruction in psychological war. Of course, any Taliban troops that want to surrender and study C++ can join the production. There are better ways to get constant stream of virgins beside suicide bombing. Try making  money.

That’s it. It’ll hit Taliban right where it hurts. They treat women badly, now all their women are going somewhere else for greener pocket. Let’s see how Osama/Omar/whatever can still win elections among all red blooded gun totting male terrorists if this keeps happening.

More women coming to western civilization means less men have to be single. Also most richer males that are sugar dadies are job creators. Those afghan hot babes can help them breed more effectively creating more job creators and hence more jobs. This will at least outperform all those Obama’s stimulus because no tax payer money is spent.

All those terrorists can just go fuck themselves literally.

Eventually all oppressed people will simply go to countries where they are not oppressed like jobs moving to China.

Everybody will have strong incentive to be productive rather than grabbing political power. Economic competition will be far more important than military might. We will turn our swords into iPad and our spears into XBox or (put your favorite gadget here).

Which ever system produce the richest countries, doesn’t have to be secular or democratic, will be the system that are flocked by womyn. All hot babes will have a never ending supply of rich smart males to choose from when males, like workers and companies, compete globally.

Every kids will have rich smart non violent biological dad that can actually attract women without having to resort to force, trade restriction, or beating.

We will also be more able (though not having to) afford socialism knowing that even with their welfare checks all males will still have huge incentive to work hard and get rich.

I think it’ll be even better when we can simply commercialize and liberalize everything but this should be a start of that.

As libertarian, the only thing that may be unethical in this is if government try to tax it. But hei, even if you’re not a libertarian, none of this thing should be more evil than actually sending troops there killing muslims.

Incoming search terms:

  • truly hot babes

February 11, 2012

If We Believe in God and Stay Still

We will believe that some good outcome will happen anyway explainable away by the almighty being doing the heavy lifting. Because not even us know how exactly the outcome will happen, quite often, no body can sabotage it.

Because others see what we believe, others may believe too. After all we have so many arguments in the world. What is more convincing than to see someone, out of his selfish interest, believing the same thing?

When people believe something, they bet on it. Say you believe that Yuan will go up, you too will long Yuan and short USD right?

When people bet on something they have strong intensive to make things happen. This process is well studied and known. It’s called Nash equilibrium after John Nash, a schizophrenic Nobel Laureate that’s awarded to him for discovering the phenomena.

Beliefs are indeed very self fulfilling.

And hence, by just staying still and believing, you really do move mountains. The world have changed mainly because our beliefs have changed.

All these are inspired by just a sentence uttered by a carpenter 2 thousands years before John Nash that isn’t even serious about the issue.

So yes, many religious claims are very worthy to be learned and understood.

Just believing it, or believing what politicians say what it says would be a mistake for that means you’re missing the point. Simply ignoring religions as bullshit, will also be another mistake for you’re missing many important points for success.

Incoming search terms:

  • jim thio

February 9, 2012

Condemnation of Evil is Fine

But if that’s our only point of view, we won’t see what’s really going on. We won’t see, for example, that we too would at least be very tempted to do the same thing under the same condition. We don’t see that most people would do the same thing. In fact, if very few people would do the same thing under the same shoes, we’re not facing a great evil.

Understanding rather than simple condemnation works better in most cases.

It’s simply foolish to think that religious people will stop condoning evil once they stop believing. Beliefs are their justification of their interests. As long as people’s interests are aligned not in their productivity but in their political power, people would commit rent seeking and all other evil.

People would kill each other especially the weak as long as that’s simply what pays. People would prohibit free sex if that’s what it takes to get rid inter species competitors in the gene pool, especially those who can give more attractive offers.

Most of us simply can’t see the truth that we are an evil species genetically predestined to do little more than breeding and kicking others out. That little more things called prosperity, is the only non zero sum aspect of our life.

Most of us lie to everyone including our self, on what we truly want. That’s how we have religions and ideologies. So we can feel good about all the killing, robbing, forcing, that most of us will do anyway for that’s our true nature.

Without religion, something else will show up. Socialism, romance, respect for women are quite often are simply justification to limit our freedom to max out our profit, including profit of those they claim to protect.

Only pure commercialization of most things will stamp out evil out of human heart.

February 8, 2012

Romance is the Second Most Dangerous Religion in the World

There is a fascist religion in western world called romance. These delusional people think that

1. Men and women have roughly equal utility function that they roughly want the same thing and capable to the same thing

2. For every man, there is one women that’s special just for him

3. They favor equal outcome between men and women. When outcomes are not equal, they irrationally believe that something is wrong.

4. They think that any kind of sexual relationship where hot babes can pick richer smarter males without the males risking bankruptcy as non consensual. You name it. Prostitution, sugar dadies, pimping, concubinage, and women trafficking. In their eyes ALL hot babes prefer to be a wife of some poor cave dwelling terrorists rather than sharing a richer smart males.

Why is this a religion?

Most religions have no proof. This religion is proven wrong again and again and again and again and again and again and again

1. Men and women are not equal. They attract mates differently. They gain reproductive success differently. Women get pregnant. Men impregnate hot babes. Beauty and tits matter more in babes. Wealth and brain matter more in dudes. Having big tits lower dudes’ market value last time I check but improve babes market value.

2. We are not meant to be paired one on one. That’s not how free market work. Just go to restaurants and see how some are full and others are empty. Just look at the number of hot babes that mate with basketball players. Also check out the rate of failing marriage. Monogamy doesn’t work. No “gamy” works. Nothing works if governments get involved.

3. To follower of this stupid bigotic religion, any kind of relationship that don’t match their deluded irrational beliefs are somehow “wrong”. They want to ration women to even the most insane and financially irresponsible males. In fact, in countries where people have this religions, the poor out breed the rich causing socialized big government that hurt capitalists and honest productive people that should have made more money. Yea I know, the other countries are even worst, but that’s a different issue. We’re not trying to make better countries here. We’re trying to understand the world the way they are so we can improve our self.

They’re using the same spell books most religious bigots use.

1. Like typical religions, followers of this nonsense want to indoctrinate our kids. Information that challenge their beliefs, like porn, are declared dangerous for minor. Yet dangerous irrational nonsense like romance that promote heinous fascist relationship like marriage are shown again and again and again. This so called marriage are heavily regulated by fascist states and have caused untold miseries.

2. Any information that may challenge their beliefs are called disrespectful for women. If you call hot babes hot, they will not say you’re wrong. They know you’re right. They just say you disrespect women for mysterious reasons. The hot babes don’t mind. It’s always the other not so hot babes that do. So far, only one hot babe got angry with me for doing it. Now she’s stuck in a marriage she can’t get out with some other guy. Poor her.

3. They actively promote DISCRIMINATION against those that don’t share their beliefs or have different orientation. Their idea of not discriminating means discriminating in favor of equality of outcome or outcome they prefer. For example, in German, prostitution is taxed and yet having sex with ones’ wife is tax free. This unfairly encourage people to get married. In US, prostitution is even illegal. Healthy relationship with sugar babies are legally unclear there. Romance, like Islam, Christianity, etc. promote marriage under terms they considered best rather than letting individuals decide for themselves.

4. Romance actively promote sexist laws. They prohibit prostitution, which is one of the few jobs in the world where hot babes can earn way more money than men. They forced bosses to pay for paternity leaves for pregnant women. This put hot babes that can simply pick richer men without working at serious disadvantage because that rich men will have to pay some other pregnant women that doesn’t pick him. They also prohibit many various consensual sexual solicitation even though many hot babes may actually want to take the offers.

5. They think any males that want women for fucking as pervert. Then they claimed that homosexuality is abnormal. Man. Science have proven again and again and again. Normal=pervert. You don’t like tits, you’re abnormal. You like only a pair, you’re abnormal. You want hot babes mainly as your video games buddy, you’re abnormal. You play video games together with hot babes on the hope that she upgrade you into a fuck buddy. Now that’s normal. You enjoy risking your whole life’s income to pay a lifetime alimony without any legal hard bargaining position to get laid, then either you’re the most stupid loser in the world or abnormal. Love is NOT normal. Lust is. Men want fucking. That’s what we mainly want, that’s all we’re willing to spend resources for. If hot babes prefer that offer, so what? Yet this bigots think it’s wrong to want what you want even though you have no intent to force that to hot babes non consensually.

6. In Afghanistan, when muslim bigots kill women that don’t follow their religion, they call it honor killing, as if they’re protecting women dignity. Anyone other men giving different more attractive offers are called disrespectful of women. In western world, where romance bigots jail women for doing consensual acts, they call it protecting women dignity. Anyone trying to point out that the many hot babes are wanting it are also called disrespectful of women.

7. Like most religions, these people take away women’s choice under the pretext of protecting women’s dignity. They condemn women for being women, namely wanting the best genes to knock up her womb with plenty of resources and protection for raising kids. Those wise financially prudent women are called sluts and hoes, which, romantic people threat as sub humans.

8. In indonesia, those who said there is no God, are jailed for insulting religion. In western world, those who said that hot babes are hot babes are said to disrespect women. Anyone saying that most hot babes are sex objects or sexy objects and many wanna be hoes will lost their career for supposedly “insulting women.” Even though there are hundreds of hot babes that work as strippers that can testify that they enjoy their job and love it, none of those would change the beliefs of those with faith. Followers of these religion cannot differentiate between honest criticism with very high probability of actually being true and mere insults. They, like most religions, would claim any honest criticism as blasphemy that they think should be illegal.

9. And just like any religions, the solution is to simply understand, keep our mouth shut, pretend it’s true, and get ahead secretly. Oh ya, why the fuck I am writing this again? Hopefully no body reads.

10. It’s because of them all other more oppressive religions survive. The reason why people are religious is because religious leaders control whether they get laid or not. So people need to kow tow to whatever religious leaders want just to get laid. Imagine a world where women freely choose. Imagine a world where religious leaders no longer decide under what terms women can mate with and with whom. Imagine a world without marriage, or at least a religiously sanctioned marriage coerced by prohibition of virtually all better consensual alternatives. Religions will disappear by itself.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB secret religious societies
  • big tits mate
  • powered by phpBB basketball
  • powered by phpBB brain
  • powered by phpBB girls playing with their boobs
  • Woman with big Tits
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Loading...