Free Market Forever

March 15, 2012

Parenting Now and Then

Let me try to understand. That’s where we differ A LOT.

So, you think libertarian position is: Drum roll…

Government does have right to limit the number of child a rich father can make.
Then you said this better than my self:

Quote

Having more children than the “replacement rate” is CHILD ABUSE

Is that what you’re saying?


1. Government has no right to prevent the poor to keep breeding children. In India and Indonesia, for example, child of the poor are just starving and government should just let that happen. But it’s legal to keep breeding kids you can’t afford to educate, clothe, and feed.
2. Yet government does have a justifiable case to limit the number of child rich smart males can make.

Is that what you’re saying?

It doesn’t matter that each kids of a billionaire ended up being more successful than each kid of homeless bum in a welfare less state. It doesn’t matter that you can have it both way, quality and quantity, in businesses. It doesn’t even matter that the rich smart billionaires, maybe nobel laurates, already give better genes to those kids. It doesn’t matter that in modern state, kids learn mainly from video games rather than government infested schools or father’s “quality time” that’s made obsolete by iPad. It doesn’t matter if my kids can do programming before they age ten. It doesn’t matter that if mom doesn’t have to work kids will have access to more mom’s time. Billionaires just can’t make more than 2.1 kids.

So where can that billionaire inherit all his wealth if he only has 2 kids?

Damn and all this time I thought the mullahs are the greatest threat of freedom. At least they allow contract marriage and polygamy though I still hate them for criminalizing porn and sex outside their pimphood called marriage.

No wonder you got economy crisis. Maybe those creationists are right. We are getting dumber. No wonder we keep killing each other.

Yet it’s legal to mate with that homeless bum as long as he is single and it’s illegal for hot babes to agree to share a rich smart males. And who decide that? The woman? No. You. You believe what’s good for “teh children” and you effectively say that you and government can decide who the women should choose. Namely they much choose a man that doesn’t have 2.1 kids yet.

That’s what you think is ideal?

If that’s libertarianism, I am not a libertarian. In fact, I realized I am closer to minarchist. Hei, I may be somewhere between minarchist and social democrat actually. Even that social democrat don’t limit freedom as much. I am surprised that this is what most white people think. That somehow it’s not okay to make many kids even if you can afford it. That’s how they’re dysgenic, like chinese. Well, I guess I realized now that I have no allies.

Also who says that replacement rate is 2.1? If a man is so rich and attractive like Tiger Wood and have 10 mistresses, his replacement rate is 12.1 right?

Incoming search terms:

  • choose hottest babes
  • powered by phpBB criminal background check
  • powered by phpBB religion in korea
  • pregnant harem
  • powered by phpBB girls basketball
  • powered by phpBB petroleum used ancient cultures
  • powered by phpBB different cultures in turkey
  • powered by phpBB nature of logic and perception
  • www afghanistan hot babes com
  • www googlehotbaes
  • afghanistan hot babe
  • powered by phpBB money tree craft
  • powered by phpBB korean culture
  • powered by phpBB asian television
  • harem pregnant
  • babesmales
  • www hotafghanbabes

February 24, 2012

What About Organ Selling is Inherently Wrong?

Morality evolve out of subjective preferences of those who are in power.

Western people have a far stronger sense of “equality” of outcome as their ideal than other people. To western people, any means that allow some productive guys to live longer, acquire more mates, or survive better in the gene pool will always be “wrong”.

If the rich can just buy organ, then they can get higher priority for treatment and live longer. This is “wrong” in western countries.

Prohibition of organ donor is just one among many similar strings of rules.

If health care is totally regulated through free market mechanism, the rich can live longer than the less productive people. Tada… It’s wrong. Now whether they can get medical treatment is decided by “death panel” http://lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory241.html

If sugar babies are legal, the rich that can attract and pay more women can get more women than the poor. Tada… It’s wrong.

When education is totally privatized, smarter kids and kids with richer parents will get better education. Tada… It’s wrong.

If prostitution is legal, hot babes can earn large amount of money http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hmXLonSBMNvhOli00jFF0fK65pSw Tada… It’s wrong again.

I recognize some pattern here. Every time some one with better talent can get something other people cannot, there will be tons of people that say it’s wrong. If the number is large enough, suddenly it becomes wrong.

Effectively while you can be rich in western civilization through productivity, which is the great part of this civilization, the only thing you can buy with your money are doodads that won’t improve your gene pool survival.

Effectively it’s genocide against the most productive individuals and in western civilization, that’s moral. That’s ethical. Just 60 years ago they slaughtered their best and brightest in German and Turkey, when everything else fail.

Actually the same happen in other civilizations too. I guess it’s just human basic instinct to get rid superior competitors out of the gene pool.

Yes you can make way more money than your comrades, but money is the only thing you can have more.

Allowing organ donor will allow dying persons to inherit more wealth to his offspring. Most organs are regenerate-able. Kidneys for example can be taken up to 75% and will grow back. So is bone marrow. This will greatly eliminate poverty. That would undermine governments’ excuse to get bigger, and hence will be considered wrong too.

Having an organ market will establish some market price. That way every soldiers that are killed in battle can have their organ harvested and the money can go to their families.

It’s not wrong in ethical sense. It’s wrong in a sense that it’s politically incorrect. Government want to regulate trade and by selling your organ you sort of undermine their effective “ownership” of your body.

Another issue is most things that give government power over what you control is considered ethical by government. It’s like robbers thinking that you giving him wallet is a good thing. Why wouldn’t he?

So smoking save dope is “wrong” while government having power to decide what you can smoke is considered “good”

enter image description here

The same way marriage where government control everything is considered good while prostitution where you decide for your self the term is considered bad.

Here, organ transplant is the same thing. If someone want to sell organ and deal with you straight, it’s wrong. If government then regulate it by preventing the organ donor from getting top bucks and giving the organ to the most worthless death row inmates, it’s “good”.

The whole thing is just statist mentality.

In a sense, ownership is not as important controlship and controlship is effective ownership.

By preventing you to sell your organ, government effectively says that they “own” your body and you have to bribe officials first before they allow it. By selling your organ you effectively rob government out their ownership.

It’s the same with prohibition of sex outside marriage. Government is effectively saying that they are the only pimp and you got to appease them first before you can have sex by bribing or picking only singles or those favored by government.

When you do consensual acts with high value without governments’ approval, governments official lose their potential bribe that they could have had.

This may sound strange. But just look at income tax. People actually think that if you don’t pay tax you rob government, even though it’s your own money. It’s like that.

Some safeguard need to be there to ensure that people don’t just sell their organ based on some hidden clause written in small letters when they sign up to some internet free cookies offer. However, there is nothing unethical or wrong in selling organ in most cases that I know of.

Incoming search terms:

  • germany hot babes
  • nakedgroupgirls

February 12, 2012

Freedom for Women in Afghanistan

I have another idea for oppressed girls from Afghanistan. All we need is a millionaire that want to sponsor that girl and gave her place and a normal job for a year. After 1 year, gave that women a choice. She can choose to

1. Go back to Afghan. We can apologize for wasting their time and replace their 1 year salary of $20.

2. Keep working on any normal job. If they pick this, there could be some “capacity problems” where socialist workers will start bitching about immigrant hot babes taking away all their jobs. Typical western anti immigrant rhetoric. Well, but I bet 99% of them would choose to:

3. Be a sugar baby/wife of some guy should any western males manage to woo them. I suggest becoming a sugar baby rather than becoming a wife because marriage is too infested with religions, state influence, and who knows what. But it’s up to them. We just need to make sure that she is not coerced, or look coerced in any way. We really do not need coercion when competing with poor unshaven cave dwelling wife beating nose cutting Taliban dudes. However, some feminazis may will argue that our offers are non consensual and an exploitation precisely because of that.

4. Taliban discriminates against exhibitionists. Some Afghan women may be a closeted exhibitionists. They could be our next porn star and their movie can be parachuted into Taliban territory with cheap portable movie player as weapon of moral destruction in psychological war. Of course, any Taliban troops that want to surrender and study C++ can join the production. There are better ways to get constant stream of virgins beside suicide bombing. Try making  money.

That’s it. It’ll hit Taliban right where it hurts. They treat women badly, now all their women are going somewhere else for greener pocket. Let’s see how Osama/Omar/whatever can still win elections among all red blooded gun totting male terrorists if this keeps happening.

More women coming to western civilization means less men have to be single. Also most richer males that are sugar dadies are job creators. Those afghan hot babes can help them breed more effectively creating more job creators and hence more jobs. This will at least outperform all those Obama’s stimulus because no tax payer money is spent.

All those terrorists can just go fuck themselves literally.

Eventually all oppressed people will simply go to countries where they are not oppressed like jobs moving to China.

Everybody will have strong incentive to be productive rather than grabbing political power. Economic competition will be far more important than military might. We will turn our swords into iPad and our spears into XBox or (put your favorite gadget here).

Which ever system produce the richest countries, doesn’t have to be secular or democratic, will be the system that are flocked by womyn. All hot babes will have a never ending supply of rich smart males to choose from when males, like workers and companies, compete globally.

Every kids will have rich smart non violent biological dad that can actually attract women without having to resort to force, trade restriction, or beating.

We will also be more able (though not having to) afford socialism knowing that even with their welfare checks all males will still have huge incentive to work hard and get rich.

I think it’ll be even better when we can simply commercialize and liberalize everything but this should be a start of that.

As libertarian, the only thing that may be unethical in this is if government try to tax it. But hei, even if you’re not a libertarian, none of this thing should be more evil than actually sending troops there killing muslims.

Incoming search terms:

  • truly hot babes

February 8, 2012

Romance is the Second Most Dangerous Religion in the World

There is a fascist religion in western world called romance. These delusional people think that

1. Men and women have roughly equal utility function that they roughly want the same thing and capable to the same thing

2. For every man, there is one women that’s special just for him

3. They favor equal outcome between men and women. When outcomes are not equal, they irrationally believe that something is wrong.

4. They think that any kind of sexual relationship where hot babes can pick richer smarter males without the males risking bankruptcy as non consensual. You name it. Prostitution, sugar dadies, pimping, concubinage, and women trafficking. In their eyes ALL hot babes prefer to be a wife of some poor cave dwelling terrorists rather than sharing a richer smart males.

Why is this a religion?

Most religions have no proof. This religion is proven wrong again and again and again and again and again and again and again

1. Men and women are not equal. They attract mates differently. They gain reproductive success differently. Women get pregnant. Men impregnate hot babes. Beauty and tits matter more in babes. Wealth and brain matter more in dudes. Having big tits lower dudes’ market value last time I check but improve babes market value.

2. We are not meant to be paired one on one. That’s not how free market work. Just go to restaurants and see how some are full and others are empty. Just look at the number of hot babes that mate with basketball players. Also check out the rate of failing marriage. Monogamy doesn’t work. No “gamy” works. Nothing works if governments get involved.

3. To follower of this stupid bigotic religion, any kind of relationship that don’t match their deluded irrational beliefs are somehow “wrong”. They want to ration women to even the most insane and financially irresponsible males. In fact, in countries where people have this religions, the poor out breed the rich causing socialized big government that hurt capitalists and honest productive people that should have made more money. Yea I know, the other countries are even worst, but that’s a different issue. We’re not trying to make better countries here. We’re trying to understand the world the way they are so we can improve our self.

They’re using the same spell books most religious bigots use.

1. Like typical religions, followers of this nonsense want to indoctrinate our kids. Information that challenge their beliefs, like porn, are declared dangerous for minor. Yet dangerous irrational nonsense like romance that promote heinous fascist relationship like marriage are shown again and again and again. This so called marriage are heavily regulated by fascist states and have caused untold miseries.

2. Any information that may challenge their beliefs are called disrespectful for women. If you call hot babes hot, they will not say you’re wrong. They know you’re right. They just say you disrespect women for mysterious reasons. The hot babes don’t mind. It’s always the other not so hot babes that do. So far, only one hot babe got angry with me for doing it. Now she’s stuck in a marriage she can’t get out with some other guy. Poor her.

3. They actively promote DISCRIMINATION against those that don’t share their beliefs or have different orientation. Their idea of not discriminating means discriminating in favor of equality of outcome or outcome they prefer. For example, in German, prostitution is taxed and yet having sex with ones’ wife is tax free. This unfairly encourage people to get married. In US, prostitution is even illegal. Healthy relationship with sugar babies are legally unclear there. Romance, like Islam, Christianity, etc. promote marriage under terms they considered best rather than letting individuals decide for themselves.

4. Romance actively promote sexist laws. They prohibit prostitution, which is one of the few jobs in the world where hot babes can earn way more money than men. They forced bosses to pay for paternity leaves for pregnant women. This put hot babes that can simply pick richer men without working at serious disadvantage because that rich men will have to pay some other pregnant women that doesn’t pick him. They also prohibit many various consensual sexual solicitation even though many hot babes may actually want to take the offers.

5. They think any males that want women for fucking as pervert. Then they claimed that homosexuality is abnormal. Man. Science have proven again and again and again. Normal=pervert. You don’t like tits, you’re abnormal. You like only a pair, you’re abnormal. You want hot babes mainly as your video games buddy, you’re abnormal. You play video games together with hot babes on the hope that she upgrade you into a fuck buddy. Now that’s normal. You enjoy risking your whole life’s income to pay a lifetime alimony without any legal hard bargaining position to get laid, then either you’re the most stupid loser in the world or abnormal. Love is NOT normal. Lust is. Men want fucking. That’s what we mainly want, that’s all we’re willing to spend resources for. If hot babes prefer that offer, so what? Yet this bigots think it’s wrong to want what you want even though you have no intent to force that to hot babes non consensually.

6. In Afghanistan, when muslim bigots kill women that don’t follow their religion, they call it honor killing, as if they’re protecting women dignity. Anyone other men giving different more attractive offers are called disrespectful of women. In western world, where romance bigots jail women for doing consensual acts, they call it protecting women dignity. Anyone trying to point out that the many hot babes are wanting it are also called disrespectful of women.

7. Like most religions, these people take away women’s choice under the pretext of protecting women’s dignity. They condemn women for being women, namely wanting the best genes to knock up her womb with plenty of resources and protection for raising kids. Those wise financially prudent women are called sluts and hoes, which, romantic people threat as sub humans.

8. In indonesia, those who said there is no God, are jailed for insulting religion. In western world, those who said that hot babes are hot babes are said to disrespect women. Anyone saying that most hot babes are sex objects or sexy objects and many wanna be hoes will lost their career for supposedly “insulting women.” Even though there are hundreds of hot babes that work as strippers that can testify that they enjoy their job and love it, none of those would change the beliefs of those with faith. Followers of these religion cannot differentiate between honest criticism with very high probability of actually being true and mere insults. They, like most religions, would claim any honest criticism as blasphemy that they think should be illegal.

9. And just like any religions, the solution is to simply understand, keep our mouth shut, pretend it’s true, and get ahead secretly. Oh ya, why the fuck I am writing this again? Hopefully no body reads.

10. It’s because of them all other more oppressive religions survive. The reason why people are religious is because religious leaders control whether they get laid or not. So people need to kow tow to whatever religious leaders want just to get laid. Imagine a world where women freely choose. Imagine a world where religious leaders no longer decide under what terms women can mate with and with whom. Imagine a world without marriage, or at least a religiously sanctioned marriage coerced by prohibition of virtually all better consensual alternatives. Religions will disappear by itself.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB secret religious societies
  • big tits mate
  • powered by phpBB basketball
  • powered by phpBB brain
  • powered by phpBB girls playing with their boobs
  • Woman with big Tits

February 7, 2012

What’s the Difference?

When women don’t follow the norms in Afghanistan they are killed by “Honor Killing”
When women don’t follow the norms in western world, they are prohibited from doing so under the pretext of “respecting women”

So except for the relative amount of control, what’s the difference?

What about if things deemed demeaning for women are things most hot babes truly want and the reason why it’s prohibited is because somebody don’t want them to have that choices?

Some people honor women by killing them, through honor killing. Some people honor women by prohibiting all choices that allow women to pick richer men more easily. That effectively ration females to males that would kill them like http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Autopsy-Missing-mom-s-kids-killed-in-WA-suffered-3100705.php. Why not let the hot babes choose?

I honor hot babes by calling them hot, and I am a pervert.

January 15, 2012

Learn! Don’t Blame

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:33 pm

If people are evil to you, then you’re not fair enough.

If people fool you, then you’re not smart enough.

If hot babes don’t want you, then you’re not rich enough.

So be fair. Be smart and be rich.

If you are fair, and people are still evil to you, well, they’re screwed.

If  you’re smart and people fool you, then they’re screwed.

If you’re rich and the girl still don’t like you, then send a message to her every year reminding her of how rich you are. Make her sorry. Find other girls of course, mean while. Who knows you ended up getting a few.

January 13, 2012

Marines that Pee on Talibans end Talibanism than Those Killing Talibans

Spirits are the true self. Our bodies are just tools used by the spirits, the genes, the memes, the religions, to propagate itself.

Kill a taliban, and more bodies will born to replace used bodies.

Pee on Talibans. Spread porn. Hire afganistan hot babes as sex workers, and any Taliban will be over in no time.

That’s why people hate porn so much. Porn exterminate them faster than gun. They’d rather get shot than letting porn spread. What ever they hate, do it, and bigots will be exterminated quickly.

Incoming search terms:

  • harem fuck
  • powered by phpBB marines
  • afghan babes naked
  • babes harem
  • hot afghan babes
  • kızlar haremi
  • undressed women

August 31, 2011

Religion can be good :)

I want people to be more religious.

However rather than following all these “bad” religions. I want them to instead believe, that I, Jim Thio, is a prophet, and God wants everyone to pay me $1k every year.

Saying those 2 sentences will turn them into “believers.”

Then I want believers to have faith. So I don’t have to proof anything.

Then I want them to be vigilant against all heresy, namely those who do not believe the religion I have given them.

Trying to convert “believers” into non “believers” is a crime (once I got enough believers). I mean religion is not just personal conviction. I am losing $1k/year for each of those apostate here.

Then I want people not to ever have sex outside marriage. Here, marriage is defined to be a relationship between beautiful women and Jim Thio or somebody Jim Thio approved, usually after some political concession.

For some reason, I prefer to define marriage for the mass rather than letting the consenting parties decide. That should effectively make me the pimp all of hot babes.

I’ve heard how some competing religions pull this out to motivate people to die for them. I guess, if it work once, why shouldn’t it work again right?

Also I want them to stone those who have sex outside “marriage” as defined by Jim Thio.

For those who don’t get it:
Obviously this is a joke. Well not that I wouldn’t want that if I can. Who wouldn’t. But isn’t this how religions operate? The moral is actually to be more cynical toward religion. However, sigh…. This should get the point across more.

Incoming search terms:

  • googlehotbabes

March 13, 2011

I Think I Can Cure Homosexuality

Homosexuality is nature driven. The cause is lack, or expectation of lack of, hot babes. Males in jail, for example, are more likely to be gay.

The cure is of course porn. Porn with hot beautiful babes. That will cure them. We just need more sexy porn and we’ll win them over to God.

If you’re really devoted to the cause, you can also offer your wives, daughters, mothers, and girlfriends to homos or anyone claiming to be one. That’ll cure them. You’ll have big reward in heaven.

March 8, 2011

Eliminate All Bad Ideologies

I got an idea how to effectively force prosperity all over the world. Women’s choice women’s best interest. Let the women choose. Can’t be bad for them? So just allow consensual international sex workers market. Let the market decide whether hot women prefer clit cutting Talibans or paying Capitalists. When this work, whichever ideology produce the most money will pretty much obliterate all other system. What would the majority of males in any country would do when their hot babes move to richer countries? The problem is western countries are ruled by feminists that obviously don’t want cheaper competitors, hence the real reason behind anti women trafficking laws. Embrace free comercialized sex as much as we embrace free market, and poof. Anything women do not like will be gone because males will have to compete for women and countries will have to compete for productive workers.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Loading...