If I ask my feeling who should I choose, obviously wealthy. However, emotion can be misleading.
If I can choose between being wealthy and shagless or being a poor stud, I’d choose studs.
In socialized liberal western civilization being a stud can be FAR more lucrative than being wealthy.
Think about it. I do not enjoy luxury. All I care about entertainment, beside sex, is video games that’s getting cheaper and cheaper. I do not need private yach. I don’t even enjoy parties.
The main reason why I want to be rich is so my kids got good education and opportunity.
But here’s the catch. With welfare program, with every body thinking that EVERY kid should have enough chance. In a world where even the conservative says that NO CHILD should be left behind, what’s the point of being a financially responsible dad?
The government already pays for that.
Recently Obama said that salary must be enough so EVERYONE can raise a family. Again, what’s the point of working hard if EVERYONE can raise a family? Looks like in the long run, 10000 years from now, your gene pool survival is decided solely by the number of your kids you have now, each of which will have 2.1 kids irrelevant of wealth or productivity.
This is another way to think about it. Say you want to maximize your gross domestic product of your bloodline. One poor guy works hard to get rich. Another poor guy just be studs.
The poor nerdy guy that work hard to get rich will have to fight off government programs. Voters are bigotic and everybody think everybody wants to get rich. So you will see public school arranged to ensure everyone graduate slowly, you’ll see a never ending licensing requirement even for florist, you’ll see degree system made not to certify your capability but to kick out those who can’t get a degree out of competition, you got to face all those shit.
After that you’re taxed.
Now look at the studs. He just breed and breed and after one generation, all his kids will have enough chance to be a middle class, let’s say, with YOUR money.
At the end, that stud ended up having more genetic GDP by not working at all. Yea each of his kid will be poorer, but the some of wealth and power controlled by those kids will be bigger because he has more kids. Everyone would say, ah this poor guy has been oppressed and underprivileged and stuff.
Obviously the super rich can get wise and be a stud too and be both. That’ll be ideal. However, cockblocking rules are aimed mainly against this type of ideal.
And that’s what we want to learn in this thread. How to live a balance life. Get Rich Bang Bitches.
You know what, I am not interested to get laid just for getting laid sake. It’s too easy. Women are so cheap in Indonesia. You think massage therapists that’ll rub her naked body on you for $30-$50 is not pretty? You mean none of them want to be your girlfriend or mistress should you wish? It’s actually knocking up reasonably high quality women and breed high decent sons and daughters are the one more worthy to pursue.
The issue is not how to get women’s consent. It’s too easy. Just pay.. You ALWAYS pay, as my business coach once told me. Marriage is just a form of prostitution. Think about it. The issue is more of cost management, and political consideration. That’s an aspect everyone don’t pay enough attention too.
Incoming search terms:
- powered by phpBB physics test
Why rich smart attractive males avoid marriage? Why religions teach you to get married? Why feminazis prevent consenting females from accepting high paying jobs and escaping patriarchal oppression? Why force and deceit are often more politically correct than consent in getting a mate? What should you do to help your self?
