Free Market Forever

February 24, 2012

Marginal Liberatarian Evolution!

The following are things that should be legalize because there isn’t any argument prohibiting it:

1. Polyandry. While there are plenty of arguments against polygamy, most of which only apply to males having many wives. The idea that no women are willing to share, for example, may be valid for females. There is no way it’s valid for males. Many males including me do not mind sharing one hot babe. In fact, I’d rather share a hot babe than be the only one for an ugly fat bitch. Another argument against polygamy is that women are forced into it. Well, who knows what women want. One thing for sure is I won’t feel being forced to share Miyabi. Finally polygamy is not inconsistent with democracy of one man one vote. That last one is the one that make some sense to me, but only if sex outside marriage is illegal. Still, there is no where in history where polyandry concentrate power in the hand of 1 women.

2. Legalized paid sex if it is to encourage women to divorce her existing husband. Think about it. The main argument against prostitution is that it is always forced. When there is no force involved, the argument goes that lack of choice count as force. For example, if the women would starve unless she becomes a prostitute, feminazis would count that as force. Well, if a woman already has a husband that’s a non issue then. She has a choice, namely staying married. She just choose better. Hence it’s definitely more consensual.

3. Legalized non promiscuous commercial sex. Many arguments against prostitution in general doesn’t fly when the prostitution comes in the form of sugar babies.  One of the main argument against prostitution is that promiscuity spread STD. Well it doesn’t work for sugar babies that are not promiscuous. In fact, the majority of STD spreads among teen more than prostitute. Another is that women are forced by pimps. Again, there is no pimp in sugar babies. Another argument is lack of choice that count as forced. Well, most sugar babies are hot enough to marry. Yet they just choose better.

4. Legalized safe drug. If it’s save, like marijuana and ecstasy, why prohibit it? Duh…

5. Legalized organ sales on organs that are regrow-able or allow people to voluntarily sell his organ when he died. When organ is regrowable, like blood or marrow, there is an abundance supply of organ. Buying the organ will not cause adverse effect. The same way, many dying people want to inherit more wealth to their offsprings. So why not let them sell their organ harvestable when they died?

In the future, more can be legalized. However, the 5 should be a start.

Incoming search terms:

  • feminazi asian women

November 1, 2011

Why I am doing all these?

Why free market forever? Why the site? Why all the writing?

Have you ever seen kids begging on the street and then some other kids bigger than them collect money from those little kids. That’s what I see every day I go out in my country. No body care about those kids.

Yet when one those poor teen (say after legal age) or her mom would prostitute her self or be second/3rd wife to rich males that can and want to afford her, every body screams exploitation.

Also, I am not blaming anyone. I am not blaming those people for being hypocrite. Evolution theory already predict that they will be like that. I understand.

All those people do not know what they’re doing. Those who know don’t speak and silently become dictators and politicians making sure that those who speak don’t know. Those who do know and speak wouldn’t be believed anyway.

And that’s the whole point of being an effective hypocrite. Humans are not just hypocrite, they are very good and effective at it.

Successful hypocrites are those who somehow can maintain far different images than reality. In zero sum games like pursuance of power and sexual selection, we expect lies, effective successful lies, to prevail over truth.

By the way, the explanation to those apathy toward begging kids is simple and scientific. We don’t care about kids begging on the street because we indeed don’t care. Evolution theory predicts that humans do not care a lot about those that are non relative, too dissimilar or non reciprocal.

For altruism trait to reproduce it must somehow improve reproductive success. Caring for kids begging on the street doesn’t. It works for all species. Not just human.

Caring about women choosing to be prostitutes or 6th wife does improve a man’s reproductive success if you can count that as caring.

Humans, as chimps and gorillas, also do not care about their kind. However, males in power, such as voters, do not want women to pick other males that indeed have better more attractive offers.

That would effectively force women to aim lower, hence improving the bigot’s reproductive success. So most males primates want to prohibit many consensual choice. One great way to do that is to punish women that pick better offers.

So they get more followers to support their agenda, they need to come up with something else to mask their intent. None of those are scientific of course.

From religion, to women’s dignity, etc. All are well, non scientific. How do you proof or disproof that getting paid for sex raise or lower dignity?

It’s not science. It never is. We’re lying. We’re not interested to explain truth. We don’t use science to lie big to public. It’s tougher.

That’s what humans are. Humans are irrational and come up with irrational nonsense to justify what they want to do deep inside. They’re hypocrites, very effective ones.

We hold this truth with plenty of evidences that humans are different. Because we are not equally healthy, smart, productive, diligent, attractive, and aggressive we have different rules. Different rules serve different people. So each of us want the world to be governed differently.

Some of those rules have strong zero sum aspect. All we care is getting as many people as possible to believe what we believe and support what we support. We don’t care about truth.

So we lied. So we encouraged faith, so others would believe it anyway despite lack of or instead of evidences.

And neither religions or atheism are there to blame. Ask any religious engineers and I am sure he knows how basic physics work. Ask any atheists why they oppose prostitution/polygamy and most likely he doesn’t use science either. I bet he’ll use vague non scientific words like “dignity” or “respect for women”. Actually that’s the easiest way to see when someone is lying. He used vague words.

The problem is indeed in the structure of the game itself.

When we cooperate, like in understanding bricks, mortars, and light bulb, we are honest. When we are in zero sum game, like when we decide who should be in power or which guys and girls hotties can pick, we are liars. That’s the most profitable course. Of course that’s what everyone does irrelevant of whether they are religious or atheists.

Well at first my reaction is indeed hatred.

I am a mensa member. I won an international science competition. Schools are boring to me. Yet I was forced to take classes I don’t like due to evil political process.

I saw parents of low IQ kids bitching about how governments should do more to regulate education. Any billionaires in silicon valley knows that the problem is not government lack of involvement. The problem is some kids are just dumber. Why no body can see the obvious?

Finally, I had low IQ ex boyfriend and some future ex husband wanting to kill me for reasons I didn’t understand. Obviously I did nothing “wrong” against them.

Yes I had and may still have a lot of hatred and I wanted to just exterminate all those bigots. That’s what any males would do. It’s in my genes.

However the more I learn, the more I realized that it’s not as easily avoidable as anyone would have thought. It’s as if everyone in a sense already do “the right thing”. That I am the one that’s odd out.

Everyone is like that. That’s what being human means. We’re not angels. We’re human. That’s what human do. Being hypocrite, lie to each other, and then kill each other. The greatest human is Tao and the greatest Tao is not far from just normal human. Those normal humans are the variants of our species most successfully reproduced in the past.

Think about it. Say humans are killing your tribe. You can say, don’t kill, killing sucks. The problem is, if killing is only sucks for you, why should killer stop killing? The “right thing” is of course to kill back, to bullshit back, to prosecute back and so on. It’s the natural thing. Any rational or experienced players in such situation will all do the same thing.

And that’s where we are now. We are killing each other, bullshitting each other. It’s not just sucks for us, it sucks for the other side too. Just ask any kids that got bombed by airplanes or get slaughtered by suicide bombing. Obviously stopping killing and bullshitting each other would be profitable.

However, we will not get out of this (karmic?) cycle of mayhem until we understand what’s really going on.

That’s how I got passionate of helping as many people as possible to understand evolutionary psychology. Making it mainstream. So we can see what’s the problem and come up with better solutions for all of us. Why not put all those questions used to be answered by fairy tales, religions, ideologies, and other nonsense and use science to see what’s really going on.

A long time ago, Adam Smith convince the world that that humans are selfish. By properly understanding it we slowly manage to improve humans’ gross domestic product 300 times.

For God so love the world he send Adam Smith so that any country whose people believe in free market doesn’t have to be poor but can enjoy great wealth.

Well, we are selfish, but slightly different than pure selfish. We’re also bigotic, loving, caring, xenophobic, greedy, envious, vengeful, grateful, etc. Properly understood of what we would do and why we do it there is a lot more to achieve.

The world without war, and poverty is very easy to achieve. Altruism is not the answer for poverty for the same reason morality is not the main answer for prosperity. We’re still selfish bastard just like our ancestors and yet we are all far better off thanks to capitalism and globalization. Altruism is never a good answer because humans are selfish or govern by genes who are. Still, we will be prosperous without having to stray far from our nature. Think about it.

Now, don’t be selfish. Buy the e-book.

 

Incoming search terms:

  • harem slaves
  • naked women group
  • naked harem slaves
  • hareM GIRLS
  • harem slave girl
  • naked harem girls
  • naked harem slave girls
  • naked female slaves
  • naked slave girls at the market
  • slavegirl market
  • teen prostitutes
  • naked groups of women
  • photos naked harem girls
  • harem modern day photos
  • pictures of naked slaves
  • harem slave pics
  • powered by phpBB pictures of women
  • slave harem pictures
  • harem slave girl/pics
  • powered by phpBB nature girl
  • slave naked women in harem
  • naked slavegirls market picts
  • naked slave women
  • teenage slave girl pictures
  • teens kids fuck
  • naked slave teens nature
  • naked slave girls market pictures
  • naked slaves pictures
  • slave market
  • naked women groups
  • naked women photos groups
  • slave girls naked
  • Oriental Legal age teenager
  • slave girl powered
  • photos of naked female slaves
  • real slavegirls markets free pics
  • pictures of naked harem slaves
  • pictures of naked female slaves
  • naked haremgirls
  • harem slaveboys

Origin of Morality

Sticking a knife to someone will cause him die. People don’t want to die. So they come up with some arrangements. Let’s not kill each other. But people are selfish. So they said, okay, those who kill, we kill. Tada…. We got laws and justice. Then we don’t kill each other. That would be the scientific explanation of morality. Interests of the powerful.

Still… Religious answers maybe more correct than liberal. Religious people know that you need to kill to prevent murder. Liberal that understand evolution theory doesn’t.

Even Dawkins says that we grow out of our nature. Is he out of his damn mind? Our nature is by definition what we are. No we can’t get out of it. See communism… That’s what happen when people stamp out religions too fast.

Religion with all the false reasoning is here first, and used to work. It’ll fade, but I won’t condemn that too quickly.

December 5, 2010

Do Women Care if We Love Her and Respect Her?

When they choose who they want to mate with?

Despite what everyone else said about what women want, I have never met yet one beautiful girl that seems to care whether I love her or not. They choose me anyway even though I repeatedly say I don’t love her, I do not want to get married, I hate marriage, etc. That despite they have other males stalking her professing love, etc.

Why offer what target market do not want?

I may be wrong. If they really care, then I would introduce them to those that provide those kind of love. It’s just that no body seems to care.

Not that I want women that do not want me anyway. In fact, I often introduce women to other rich, handsome, tall, and smart guys. It’s a good way to maintain good relationship. Can’t catch them all anyway.

Exactly like what evolution theory predicts.

December 4, 2010

What I Mean by Women=Sex Object

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200912/why-are-we-surprised

This guy says that clearly. I feel like I am putting women above men actually. You guys think the opposite.

Let me restate that clearly. Under libertarian principle, women will RULE the world precisely because they’re sex object. Under libertarian principle, those who own something everybody want will rule the world. Man want women. Is that clear? Obviously it’s not happening too easily. After all, males rule the world, mainly through force and fraud right? Women neither own or control their body. They just think they are.

Well, to be honest, I used to think like you. We are all indoctrinated to think that women=sex object somehow demean women. I think that misconception is the heart of all bigger government, poverty, etc.

While demeans are not really a scientific term and it’s hard to argue about it, interests are quite scientific. We can observe what people choose when they have legal (or effectively legal) choice. It’s science folks. Keep that in mind.

Mama Liberty, what do you think?

Here is a quote:
“For a man to walk into a bar and have his choice of any woman he wants, he would have to be the ruler of the world. For a woman to have the same power over men, she’d have to do her hair.” -Bill Maher

Women don’t rule the world, because they never have to.

Here is another article:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200802/the-paradox-polygamy-i-why-most-americans-are-polygamous

“Would you rather be the second or third wife of Mel Gibson or the only wife of Willard Scott?”, to which one of the panelists, the conservative commentator and activist Susan Carpenter McMillan, responded, “If it comes to Mel Gibson, I wouldn’t care if I was one, two, or three.”

The battle between creationist and those supporting evolution theory is just started. However, those 2 articles will be what the mainstream religions will be.

Incoming search terms:

  • what happened to susan carpenter-mcmillan

January 29, 2010

Don’t Antagonize the Best and Brightest

Quote:
Originally Posted by amanda11 View Post
The Jews at the Federal Reserve won’t let this happen.

Stop antagonizing the best and brightest or you ended up like German in world war 2. That being said, the German and Napoleon were pretty nice to Jews in previous war before that and lost anyway. So don’t give them too many special privilege either.

I think the Jews are pretty reasonable people. There was once upon a time I was accused of damaging my dorms’ washing machine. Many knows I didn’t do it. No body spoke up. One did. She is a Jew. A professor that went the extra mile so I can keep going to school is a Jew.

There was a class I got an AB in Math because when I asked the professor how to get a good grade the prof simply said to work hard and try to understand. In the next class, I easily got the highest score. I scored perfect. The next best score was like 75 or something. The professor in that next class, is a Jew and I bet the prof in the previous class isn’t.

“But you were taking honor classes. The other students are very smart there,” said a mediating professor. What’s his point anyway? I tearfully explained how my other friends all got A but me. Then I have to further explained that they got A on THE university. That is, the university he’s working for, the university I was taking the class, the relevant one.

At that time I should have known my whole academic career is over. If only I knew how to start a biz.

Latter I took graduate math course straight without prerequisite while I only have 2 days to learn before mid and final. I got A easily and the professor is once again a Jew. Hell I’ll vote for Jews to rule the world :D . Just kidding.

A psychiatrist that helped me understand life was a Jew. A forum owner where I hang around a lot is a Jew. There are nice reasonable normal people all over the world from many different race that are nice to me. Why is it when someone is “reasonable” there is a high chance he/she is a Jew?

Evolution and prosecution force them to be smart and it’s natural that the smart and diligence earn more money.

Hell, if we keep breeding the smartest chimpanzees and slaughtering those that don’t figure out how to avoid it eventually they’ll be pretty smart too.

However, most cultures like Chinese or Europe have dysgenic laws that prevent the best and brightest from reproducing. Monks don’t get married. There is virtually no way a rich smart male in US can mate with women without risking his WHOLE money.

Pretty women’s choice are either free sex or full blown life long monogamous marriage.

In free sex, the women got roses and chocolate that expire quickly and they have to keep coming back for more. Evolutionary psychologists say that’s what makes chocolate and roses romantic.

In marriage, government is the pimp that enforce some form of price control to protect most voters from adverse effect of free fair competition. In marriage, the bitch got full life long monogamous commitment with exclusive supplier contract, exorbitant severance pay, and a blank check to have all her kids provided irrelevant of who actually knocked her up.

Too many “couples” would consensually choose somewhere between if the choices were legal and that’s why somewhere between choices are usually illegal or legally impossible.

The Arab is actually quite reasonable because they allow polygamy and contract marriage. Like the rest, those are not getting any also use religion or other supernatural out of this world explanation as excuses to limit sexual selection’s choice often far more violently. Well, the lesser cocks are hungrier in Arab I suppose.

It’s simple. If we truly are free to choose, we often choose someone else. We may even prefer to choose something else as in case of most males preferences to watch porn rather than marrying an ugly woman.

Those that won’t get chosen are often capable and jerks enough to make rules limiting our choices. Under NO country in the world men and women have right to choose their mate under ANY REASONABLE CONSENSUAL terms. There are just too many limitation that SERIOUSLY AFFECT SEXUAL SELECTION in favor of those sexually UNCOMPETITIVE.

Guess what? People think I am a delusional idiot. As always. As usual. As if what I am explaining is too outrageous to be true.

If you’re the best and brightest you just have to be complete jerks to win gene pool survival war in most cultures and most best and brightest people choose to be nice because they think they’ll win anyway despite their niceness. Minority groups like Jews in Europe or Chinese in Indonesia don’t have power or the luxury of killing each other and hence pick being competitive path more.

Those norms are created by and for economic losers that know they can’t compete with the best and brightest in the gene pool if they were nice. If not because of globalization, the world would be full with more and more angry socialists and religious bigots that enforce more bigotic norms. No wonder people become Nazis. Exterminating the best and brightest is how those bigot stay in the gene pool in the first place. Like father like son.

And don’t bother trying to understand their prejudice. The limit is imagination and the proof is faith. What is there to understand?

October 14, 2009

Opposition of Consensual Acts often Have Hidden Motives

My point is opposition to consensual acts often have hidden motives. That hidden motives are usually to protect uncompetitive people from competition.

Maybe it’s true that ugly women also fear rape. Fine. That still doesn’t justify opposition to porn and other consensual sex. If someone rape, punish the rapist. Simple. Why they hell they have to oppose consensual acts like porn and prostitution that actually reduce rape rather than increasing it.

The fact is most women that oppose porn are ugly. It’s as if they are soooooooooo afraid of rape that they want to prohibit porn because it may cause rape. This while the pretty often become porn star. Something is missing. I am saying that’s not true. The real issue is not because the ugly are more afraid of rape. The issue is because they got hidden motives.

The same goes for anti polygamy laws. It’s there to protect poor males. Of course there are males that have so many wives he cannot afford kids. Solution: Punish males that don’t support kids and set child support payment to be constant irrelevant of daddy’s wealth. But nooo… Can’t feed them, don’t breed them. That’s not the solution people pick don’t they?

Quote from: Lorianne W on October 06, 2009, 08:02:41 PM
Rape is probably not on top of the “fear list” for ugly women.
How would you happen to know what any one woman, much less ALL ugly (subjective in itself) women fears?
The answer is, you don’t. You are not psychic, so you don’t know what a single other person fears, whether they are ugly or not.

EASY. This is the essence of evolutionary biology. In free market, what a person want is simple. What he chooses.

It’s not simple in non consensual act like rape. It’s also not simple when there are too many rules against consensual acts. So we need a third leg in the equation best interest=what he wants. The third equation is that both, in general, are most likely equal with gene pool survival.

According to evolution theory, people fear something if it reduces their gene pool survival. How do rape reduces women’s gene pool survival? It undermines women’s “choice” to mate with higher quality genes and her bargaining position to get resources in exchange of her sexual favor.

Say 2 women are equally pretty. One of them choose a mate and got a millionaire. The other get raped and mate with a hoodlum. That decrease her market value. So she ended up marrying someone poorer. See how rape sucks?

So the true cost is the lost of opportunity for the woman to mate with higher quality males or getting paid for the sexual service. It’s like software pirating. If people can pirate software why should they pay for it? So women also lost potential earning she could have gotten through the sexual service.

Let alone disease, etc.

Dignity is also an issue. If people hurt you and get away with it, it tells others that it’s okay to hit you. This is how the Jews got exterminated. They didn’t hit back hard enough that people start thinking that it’s okay to screw Jews. Eventually it leads to genocide. The same way unpunished rape means males can “use” the women without begging, buying chocolate, paying, caresing, bla bla bla, so why the hell should any male do all those to get her?

The prettier the woman the higher the cost, quite obviously. Pretty woman then lose more to rape than an ugly one. So I conclude that relative to prettier women, uglier women fear rape less.

Keep in mind that’s not really the point. I am not arguing that we shouldn’t punish rape against ugly women. I am arguing that all consensual sex, like porn, prostitution, and consensual women trafficking should all be legal.

Can we quantify damage? Well, to quantify damage we need market price. To know the market price, we need the market. Prostitution is illegal, so no market. But once it’s legal, you’ll see I am right.

Here is a simpler way to see it. Pretty women’s choice matter more. Males are willing to pay more to have prettier women choose him. In general. Rape take away women’s choice. So rape hurt the pretty more than the ugly.

October 6, 2009

Non Judgemental View on Consensual Crime

Let’s ignore morality for a while.

Imagine a world where morality is just bullshit we use to persuade others to be on our side, usually enforceable by might. A world, not much different than the real one, but lets’ presume it’s true for a while.

Because there is no morality, there is no right. There is only interests. People want to maximize their interest.

Imagine if a woman is ugly.

Everyone wants to maximize their interest, and evolution theory tell us that it means reproducing.

Now here is an ugly woman.

What is the greatest danger this woman will face in successfully reproducing? Rape? Think again…

Rape is probably not on top of the “fear list” for ugly women.

Her main concern is competition.

Now if that women can choose, which one she will want to criminalize? Will she want to criminalize rape or porn?

Think about it, superior women. Ups. I got to pick my words correctly. Prettier women. Oh no… Beauty is in the eye of beholder. More attractive women. Hmm… that’s subjective. Let’s just say better “target market magnets” display all her assets in front of everyone. What will happen? It’ll create a new “industry standard” of beauty the rest must follow. It’ll drive the ugly extinct.

Now, put your self in the shoes of the ugly women. Wouldn’t she want to prohibit that?

Porn and prostitution is probably the only 2 jobs that most women can do better than males naturally. What I mean by naturally is women actually earn more money there than males even though they are not helped by affirmative action, etc. Isn’t it strange that the jobs that women do better are the very thing often prohibited? Also women want to prohibit that. However, if we understand reality, seeing through all the confusing words and look straight at photographs of those non libertarian feminists, everything should be pretty obvious.

Powered by WordPress

Loading...