Free Market Forever

March 27, 2012

Tribal War Games Teach Real Politic

I think everybody should play tribal wars.

Imagine a world without religion and God. Imagine a world without morality? Obviously most of us are not crazy enough to insist that we have to follow religious dogma even on games.

How things would be?

Well, MMO like tribal wars teach us that.

It turns out, morality evolve by it self. It’s quite difference than normal morality we are used to. But again, somehow it’s closer to the reality.

For example, if you get beaten up by some people in tribal wars, you are the “bad guy” for being weak. Other tribe will refuse your entry.

If you just build troops and play nice, people will look at you in disdain. It’s when you actually screw others, people respect and fear you.

You are loyal to your tribe. But the first person that’ll betray your tribe is usually the leader while young (read noob) players usually ended up eaten by the bigger tribe, including their ex leaders.

The poor rob other villages. The middle class trade. Main amount of money comes from resources building. It’s just like in real life.

When you’re poor your time is cheap. When you manage 3000 villages, you can’t possibly count on working. So you count on residual income.

Doesn’t mean that working hard is bad. You need that to be “ubber alles” so you got bigger faster and hence can eat smaller players.

Recently I tried to play as independent. My points jump from 18k to 90k. Well, after that I joined a tribe for protection. I got so many attacks and support from my tribe is so small. I actually lost points. Not only that, my new tribes have rules that prevent me from expanding like I used to be.

Hmm… I guess that’s why I love freedom. But once things settle, I can build offensive villages and start robbing others too.

Oh yea, there are 2 types of villages.

I suppose capitalists will just build all defensive villages. So when enemies attack they pay the price. Pure capitalists will be equivalent with guys that just build production building. That means they don’t have troops to raid other villages and will be defenseless against attack from other players. There is no such player exist in tribal wars.

Building pure defense is quite a good strategy. The problem is you can make even more money by robbing others. So it’s a balance game. Resources spent on one will deplete your resources for another.

Of course everything is part of the game.

I learn many hurtful things in life in this game. In normal life I curse and got mad. In game, I did too. But after a while, I realized it’s only a game. I learn instead of holding grudge.

Everyone is indeed psychopaths. The difference is not who are not. The difference is how psychopathic they are and how simmilar they are to each other.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB video games social
  • powered by phpBB history of computer science
  • powered by phpBB religion test
  • powered by phpBB video help
  • powered by phpBB how to stop people playing video games
  • powered by phpBB get religion
  • powered by phpBB effects of violent video games on children
  • powered by phpBB currency exchange afghani
  • powered by phpBB computers for less
  • powered by phpBB people searches
  • powered by phpBB video of girls
  • powered by phpBB the alcoholism and addiction cure
  • powered by phpBB positive effects of video games
  • powered by phpBB three interventions a person can do to help avoid heart disease
  • powered by phpBB free science teaching resources
  • powered by phpBB religion video
  • powered by phpBB video of obama
  • powered by phpBB history background check
  • powered by phpBB computer games
  • powered by phpBB get money quick
  • powered by phpBB games play for free
  • powered by phpBB tag
  • powered by phpBB rent video games
  • powered by phpBB video games
  • powered by phpBB stay after class
  • powered by phpBB politic
  • powered by phpBB i play
  • powered by phpBB at play
  • powered by phpBB best movies to rent
  • powered by phpBB brief history of psychology
  • powered by phpBB causes of alcohol addiction
  • powered by phpBB children playing photos
  • powered by phpBB class of 2011
  • powered by phpBB currency in different countries
  • powered by phpBB don\s free movies
  • powered by phpBB get video
  • powered by phpBB heroes in different cultures
  • girl slave market
  • powered by phpBB i got my game on
  • powered by phpBB western family

March 25, 2012

Can what you see decide how your children looks like

We can experiment putting a big poster of the handsome milk man next door, showing six packs, in front of our wives when we mate. Then we can check what percentage of our children somehow look more like him. Alternatively we can also show pics of the young nubile school girls in front of the husbands and see how the school girls’ babies look like.

It only works if what you see actually change your mates. It doesn’t work if you just mate with the same mate and see different things.

I just want to add to Avi answer that is the most correct. You don’t need religion to explain this.

The kind of kids the sheeps will produce depends only on the genes of those sheeps. Those genes depend on the genes of the male sheeps that more successfully mate with the ewes. What kind studs the ewes end up mating with? Now that’s a function of what the ewes actually see when they are selecting mates. In sheeps, the time they select mates is not far from the time they actually mate.

In fact, ewes, like all females, want to max out the number of their grand children. If ewes see too many pattern of the same kind, those ewes will think that the pattern is the trend and be more submissive toward studs with the same pattern.

So the story as described in http://listverse.com/2008/01/31/top-10-bizarre-biblical-tales/ is correct.

In fact, if the bible just write when the ewes are selecting mates rather than when the ewes actually mates, I think most scientists would agree. Most people are not aware that ewes, unlike humans, don’t have long courting period, becoming boyfriend or girlfriends first. They pretty much mate right away after sexual selection.

I would like to add another interesting point. It works on humans too, till now :) In fact, till now, most humans would go the extra mile manipulating what other humans see so that their kind looks “better” than the rest. Those who do it better will get selected more and survive better in the gene pool. Humans would also go the xtra mile of degrading or removing the images of those they perceive as superior competitors.

Quite recently Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist, get canned for arguing that black women are not attractive. Whether it’s true or not is beyond this (too politically incorrect and I want friends not enemies).

You see, humans are mostly (but not purely) monogamous. If males think that black women are not attractive, it too will decide the kind of kids that will be more common in the next generation.

Many fat women would want to remove super thin photo models from advertising for the exact same reason. When men see thin models future kids will indeed be thinner. That means the fat will go extinct by the way for failing to find a good mate.

What else? Yea feminazis would go the extra mile convincing the world that women are not sex objects. Otherwise, beautiful women that don’t mind becoming sex objects will indeed be the next generation of women. That means ugly feminazis will go extinct.

What else? Yea, single males would go the extra mile convincing everyone that no women could possibly want to share. Poor males would argue that all women that are paid for sex must have done that non consensually. Also we have images that older richer males using money to attract women are perverts. Those images is the reason why the poor actually breed more than the rich. It’s the reason why redistribution of wealth keeps getting bigger and bigger. It’s the reason why future kids are poor and violent.

If we want to change that, just put images of nice rich smart jewish bankers as studs paying thrilled hotties for quickies in sitcoms all over the world and see what future kids will look like.

Then what? Dumb blonde jokes. Many entertain that so they can get rid more attractive blonde women from mating market.

What else? Anti semitics would argue jews are inferior. As usual, the truth is usually the opposite of what’s politically correct. Within a few decades there were indeed fewer jews.

So yes, the kind of kids that will be common in the next generation does depend on what everybody see when they’re finding a mate (or decide who to kill). For sheeps the time you find your mate is about the same time you are actually mating. For humans, there are significant delays.

Yes it’s a miracle too. Because it works in ways most people do not know. Perhaps all miracles are just like that. There are hidden science that’s too politically incorrect to be seen. Those science never gets mainstream. So people access that anyway through faith, prayer, etc.

Incoming search terms:

  • greedy bastard
  • hot harem babe
  • women fuckin=utf-8
  • harem pregnants
  • how many men dont mind sharing their wife
  • muslim men blonde women

March 24, 2012

Why it’s Simple and Accurate to Just Presume that Everyone is a Psychopath?

I talked to a social liberal. She said she knows personally many politicians. Politicians are not psychopaths, she said. They honestly believe that drugs are bad for you. That’s why they prohibit it. They honestly believe that prostitutes are forced. So that’s why they’re against it.

Also they need votes and that’s what most voters honestly believe.

You know what. Maybe she’s right. Then again, maybe muslim religious leaders honestly believe they honestly save you from hell fire, when they beat ahmadiyah movements up for undermining their authority.

Then again, maybe ugly women honestly believe women are being oppressed when they prohibit prettier women from staring in porn.

Maybe single males actually believe that no women would want to share when they prohibit sex outside life long monogamous marriage. I know. That’s what I actually believed when I were single.

Maybe the thugs that stab you in the back and take your wallet honestly believe that they are performing appendix removal operation for you.

Who care what they believe? If you pay attention that they may be right, you will end up having to argue with millions of millions of total nonsense that somehow justify their acts to you.

Notice that all those strange beliefs follow the same pattern. It justifies acts that believe them. Those are acts that we usually called evil, like using force and fraud or limiting individuals’ freedom. There is a reason why people entertain such beliefs in the first place.

After all, how do they believe all those nonsense in the first place anyway? Simple. Those nonsense reduce the amount of hostility they will get for harming others.

Why shouldn’t they? If I beat people and I said I want money, I would have to face the cops. If I beat people and says it’s God’s will, and somehow the crowd buy it, I get less enemies. It’s toward my best interest to say it’s God’s will. In fact, it probably doesn’t hurt much to actually believe it’s indeed God’s will if that can help me convincing others more. Who knows, many people actually want to see somebody got beaten up. They just need a good fairy tales to justify it.

It’s their best interests to entertain it. It’s not to your best interest to entertain it.

Presuming they are psychopaths and not bother entertaining their nonsense allow you to see clearly what you should do. Do not let those people have power over you. Once people have power over you, it’s game over.

Like most psychopaths, politicians and society make laws criminalizing consensual behavior. It’s simple. They want to enslave you. They want to have something to justify their acts when they they feel like beating you up. That’s what psychopaths do. They blame the victim. And may be they’re right. If you’re a coward that reward their oppression with compliance and benefit nonsense with attention, why shouldn’t people pick on you?

Then again, who says we’re not psychopaths?

I don’t go around robbing people and raping women. Does that mean I am not a psychophath? Who knows? Even if I were, I still wouldn’t go around robbing people and raping chicks. It’s not toward my best interest to do so. I may go to jail and stuff. There are saver ways to get laid and rich.

Imagine if ALL of us believe that we won’t be punished at all for robbing people and raping chicks. How many do you think will do that?

Say 5% would do it.  A reasonable number. Imagine if 5% people actually do that and get away with it and every body knows they get away with it. How many would do that the next day? I’d say 100%. In fact, normal people would have gone extinct and everybody would have been a psychopath if “evil” people will just get away with things. The truth is, quite often, evil people does get away with things.

History shows again and again that majority of humans will kill, slaughter, rape, and who knows what when they know they’ll get away with it. Genocide is the norm. Schindler is the exception. Most people are NOT like Schindler. Most are like Genghish Khan. In fact, most people are descendants of people like Genghish Khan. That’s the kind of people that are successful in the gene pool

Yes, like most psychopaths, people would just come up with something to rationalize and justify their acts. Just look what our bible teach: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081109135717AAEZFlL. That’s David, a hero in the bible, killing 100 Philistines just to collect their foreskins. What’s the difference between what he does and what psychopaths would do? Somehow, we just believe David’s justification. And that’s a moral compass most people believe in. Why shouldn’t anyone be psychopaths then? I’d be surprised if anyone is not a psychopath with that kind of moral compass.

David’s dilemma is simple. Usually killing is politically incorrect. Yet his cost and reward function changes. If it’s the philistines, killing is actually rewarding. He can get the king’s daughter. So great. What would any Dave do? Who wouldn’t start collecting those foreskins? Hell, till now many still think it’s actually a good act. If societies approve you for killing people, if killing people is profitable, what would a psychopath and normal people both do? Kill. So what’s the difference?

What about tortures? How many monks love torturing and raping naked women under pretext of driving out demons in the middle ages? What do we call them? Psychopaths? I like to call them majority. In fact, not realizing this is a very psychopathic delusion.

You can’t say someone is honest just because he hasn’t had a chance to steal. Power corrupts, people say. Here is an easier way to see that. People are always corrupt. When they don’t have power, they’re not corrupt for the simple obvious reason they can’t. Once they have the powah, they behave as what they truly are.

You don’t just give your car keys to some strangers and expect that they’ll return the car and pays you rent.

There are 2 ways to analyze most similar situations.

  1. People are not normally psychopaths. However, when they see and know that violent pays so much, they become a psychopaths.
  2. People are inherently psychopaths. They’re just not convinced that robbing and rapping are profitable yet and don’t have the guts to do it yet. Once they know, they do what all psychophats would do.

The difference between 1 and 2 is subtle and may be even mere philosophical. Both will correctly predict what people would do. Both prescribe that we need tough sentences against robbery if we want to deter people from doing it.

To be frank, #2 is simpler, and correctly predict the same act anyway.

In fact, I do not really understand the difference between homo economicus and psychopaths. What’s the real difference anyway? Aren’t we all? Show me some area where large number of people do not act like they are psychopaths. Maybe I can understand it.

In fact, most humans do presume that others are psychopaths. Why do we sign contracts? Why do we have letter of credit? Why not just send the good first and hope that the other guy is not a psychopath and will honor the deal? Because we know that the other side may be a psychopath too and hence, it’s toward our best interest that it’s toward his interest to pay up. Otherwise he won’t pay.

Even if the other side is not a psychopath, we also know that when they see that frauding us is profitable, they too will turn psychopaths and follow the same path.

If even in businesses, where relationship itself is an important social capital, we presume people are psychopaths that we put so many system to ensure that their selfish interests are properly aligned with ours, how much more we should do that in politic?

Anakin Skywalker: The Sith rely on their passion for their strength. They think inward, only about themselves.
Supreme Chancellor: And the Jedi don’t?

What would happen if you trust politicians even more than you trust your business partners, namely something more than at all?

History shows again and again what will happen to your wife and kids. Just look:

Who did that? Businessmen? No. Guess again. Politicians supported by the majority of the population. How can people that count on contracts in businesses could suddenly say, that we can trust politicians to decide on what’s best for our children and family?

Simple. Those people, are psychopaths too, just like the majority of voters. They don’t care about fairness. They don’t care about productivity. They just want a reason to justify robbing from the diligent and controlling the productive. The way to do so is to give power to politicians.

Just like an interviewed psychopath once tell how much he loves his wife that he beat up to death, social democrats also entertain a ridiculous delusion. That delusion is that somehow we can trust politicians, and they, are not psychopaths.

Fortunately, politicians are psychopaths too, and we know what’s the cure. Just bribe them.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB people from
  • powered by phpBB people in the bible

February 3, 2012

What would you do if you were in the same shoes as your enemies?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 2:27 am

What would you do if you’re a political leader and you deal with so many people that don’t know and don’t want to know? Would you be honest try to explain or would you just lie your ways, fuck the people, and get them to go fuck themselves? Who among us would do things any differently and yet smart enough to get elected?

December 24, 2011

Is it a sin for jews to buy/rent/hire/acquire palestinians concubines/sex workers/sugar babies?

The bible prohibits jews from selling their daughters as prostitutes.

There is nothing in the bible that prohibit jews from hiring prostitute. Also nowadays, daughters tend to sell themselves anyway.

The palestines have grown numerous in number due to their high birth rate. Left uncheck they may ally with your enemies against you, if not already.

You can kill them all. But it’s politically incorrect since holocaust or something.

You can kill all their newborn sons. But that would be inefficient. Chicken farmers also kill 90% of all newborn male chicks. They know full well that it won’t dent the population a bit.

But their women keep giving birth to future suicide bombers. Why not hire those women to give birth to future bankers, doctors, lawyers, and scientists instead?

Can’t be through marriage because polygamy is illegal in Israel. But women don’t care. Last time I check women prefer bankers, doctors, lawyers, and scientists.

Actual arrangements are secondary. Exclusivity is not important for beautiful women. You can check http://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/764/does-marriage-terms-tend-to-kick-out-more-desirable-mates-males-out-of-mating-ma/765#765

Of course there is an issue whether palestinian girls are hot enough for jews or not. Well, maybe top 20% percentiles would do. Males aren’t that picky. The prettier the girls, the less religious they are.

Another issue is the full blood vs mixed. Still half of 100 is still 50. Full of 2 to 3 is still only 2 to 3.

That should send a message to all palestinians and all other males in the world that unless they too excel in science or business, all their seeds will be spilled on the ground. Literally.

So the last compunction should be, is it sinful?

Note:

This post is a joke as most posts in this website. It contains some exaggerations that’s essentially true.

The reality is I was sick of violent and wonder whether economic competition can replace false politics and war.

Both sides kill each other and lie to justify it. If I just said that plainly, then people would get defensive saying that’s it’s the other side that’s total asshole. So I made jokes about it instead. I do not think those who are so eager to kill or justify killing of other humans deserve so much respect that we shouldn’t joke about them. I guess things ended up even more offensive. But hei, people are killing each other. So what if we made fun of them.

The question it self is pretty serious though. Is it a sin to hire sugar babies?

Why killing, bombing, suicide bombing, mass murders, slavery, or even genocide is okay yet normal consensual financially responsible transaction is not?

There is nothing in the bible that prohibits that. Solomon has tons of concubines. It’s consensual. Paternity tests can determine fatherhood far more accurately and humanely than stoning potentially adulterous women. Contemporary marriage terms are so different than ancient marriage terms it’s essentially a different deal. No body get married in biblical sense nowadays anyway.

October 13, 2011

Does God condone rape?

Young’s Literal Translation
‘When a man findeth a damsel, a virgin who is not betrothed, and hath caught her, and lain with her, and they have been found,

http://bible.cc/deuteronomy/22-28.htm

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace.  If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor.  But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town.  When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town.  But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder.  You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.

http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm

My background is agnosticsm, christianity, and libertarian. So consider this a lense rather than the facto answer.

Here is my libertarian side speaking:
1. In NO culture, women own themselves. In US, for example, women cannot be a prostitute. That means the state, rather than the women, has power to decide what women can do. In a sense, effectively, the state, own the women. Told you I am a libertarian.
2. If women fully own themselves, they will all choose brad pit :)
3. In ancient time Israel does have debtor jail. It’s called slavery. Those who rape and can’t pay will be slave. What else do we expect?
4. In polygamistic society, women bride price are very expensive. Only the rich can get married and women prefer the rich anyway. I bet daddy took into account how hot daughtie is in measuring the bride price.

Now my atheist part is speaking
1. I don’t know whether God prohibit porn or homosexuality or not. Yahweh, the jewish God, is very different than God christians believe. Actually God christians believe is closer to Plato’s God or even Chinese’ Shang Ti. I do not know how much God wrote the bible.
2. People are homophobic and interpret scripture to fit their agenda. Those who are different than us vote for different party in election. That sucks for them. So they want that prohibited.
3. People interpret religions in ways that are politically correct. So I would expect christians will simply try to rationalize this forced to marry women. So most christians will say it’s not really happen, or it doesn’t applicable anymore. It’s called politically correct filter. They don’t teach this in sunday schools.
4. Morality is just the will of those who are in power. If your daughter got rape that means you’re weak anyway and you sort of “deserve” it. Learn kung fu next time. That’s the essence of all ancient religions. Really. All the killing of those who are different or believe differently are simply the killing of those who are weak and lootable. This explain away all genocide in the name of religion from Israelites genocide against the Canaites and German genocide against jews.
5. To be fair toward religion, without religion people would kill each other too. The athenes also kill and loot those they defeated in war. So, it’s really impractical to expect a culture to behave differently than the rest among wolves. Such culture will just go extinct.

Now my christian part want to say something:

Well, nothing. I don’t know. What to say.

Perhaps, God just want to be reasonable. In which case there is no way to know whether something is from God or from beer drinking corrupt political leaders. I wish I can know.

July 21, 2011

Another Light on Palestinians and Jewish Conflicts

A Friendly Jew
Aug 15, 2011A Friendly Jew
Jim,
Israel strives for an ideal — one that no other country does. If the London riots were in Tel Aviv, and the police were as brutal, then the world would condemn Israel. Do you hear anyone condemning the British? Are any of their professors boycotted from teaching in a university because they represent the policies of the British entity? Anyone boycotting Cadbury chocolate? No, of course not.

Israel is held to a higher standard, where anything they do is not good. No matter what.

This fuels a great debate in Israel between the hawks and the doves. Either side proves that Israel will always be hated, attacked, and marginalized. So the Hawks figure, might as well deserve the criticism and be as brutal as they say we are. The Doves figure, we should never stoop to the level of the enemy and be a low as they are.

There are no easy solutions.
Jim Thio
Aug 16, 2011Jim Thio
Mind if I post your answer in free market forever?

If the issue is as you said, then perhaps the solution is encourage objectivism.

People should see the other side as is. The good and the bad. If all allies see only the good part and all their enemies only see the bad part, then it make sense to just be brutal because allies don’t see that anyway and enemies will hate you anyway. However, if the world are more discriminating and have mechanism to reward and condemn based on real issue, then people will have more intensive to behave.

However it’s not true that British don’t get criticism. I think cops should have been more brutal there. They sucks because they’re not brutal enough. It’s for the same reason why I think Israel should be more brutal toward Samir Kuntar. You should have had death penalty.What do you do if people are robbing and stoning people?

Also there are riots too in Syria and Libya. US don’t criticize. US bombed Libya for a bunch of reason. People criticize those who are different.

In one reasonable aspect Israel does look worse than the rest of the world. You’re the only country recently that grab land and kick people out. There are other land grabbing too, but not usually followed by kicking people or usually buried deep inside “internal affair” thingy, or that it’s usually involve a small portion of a country’s land, or for any reason, not famous enough.

Now if we see that arab kicked jews out too, and that jews can’t live in palestine, and that jews are discriminated everywhere before Israel and that the most innovative and productive people in the world didn’t even have right to live 50 years ago, all those is understandable. But people don’t know that.

In my opinion, jews are simply better, in many area and people instinctively want to get rid those who are too good. Comes with the package. Sort of like borgueis in China during cultural revolution. I was surprised to learn that in non israel palestine, jews can’t even live.
A Friendly Jew
Aug 16, 2011A Friendly Jew
Jim,
thanks for asking. I would prefer that you do not quote me in this area. I’m not at all an expert in political affairs of this nature and really don’t want to be quoted. I appreciate your support of the Jewish people and of Israel. It is heartwarming to see that some people are compassionate and able to understand others.
Gil
Jim Thio
Aug 16, 2011Jim Thio
I think what you said cut straight into the heart of the problem. If people are going to think we’re evil anyway, why not be evil? Can I quote without mentioning your name.

I think lack of objectivity is the reason behind all conflicts in the world. The key to end suffering is enlightenment of what’s going one. (It’s Buddhist idea, actually). As you see I learn from many religions while having little faith in all.
A Friendly Jew
Aug 16, 2011A Friendly Jew
>Can I quote without mentioning your name.
Yes.
The reality is that a society is a collection of many people and voices. In Israel there are very divergent opinions about the best actions to take. Convey that there are doves and hawks, and neither side has the answer, both feel like they can help, but not solve the problems. And that the world offers them no support either way. So why even try to please others. At best, just make their land safe for the kids to live in.

 

Disclaimer: I am not pro jews. I am pro capitalism. I don’t care who win. I care that whoever win, win by paying and not by killing.

January 16, 2011

A Better Way to Introduce MySelf

Would be on these few sentences
1. Every kid deserves a rich smart BIOLOGICAL dad.
2. If women prefer the rich, how can there be many kids with poor dad?
3. If it’s your money, and women prefer you, why should it be someone else’ cock?

I learn game theory and evolutionary psychology a lot to see answers to these 3 truth riddles. The answers are obvious but incomplete.

I went from forum to forum and am surprised by people’s response to my statements. It’s as if everyone else is under some powerful spell that they don’t see the obvious.

Some for example think that women may not prefer the rich, even though I never make claims that all do and that those claims are necessary. Some said that rich men don’t want to make kids, even though any males with that kind of choices (emperors) will almost always do that.

Notice that’s not even the problem. Even if women prefer the rich and rich males want many women statement is only 10% true, it should be enough to eliminate poverty if prostitution is legal. My estimate is more like 90%.

Most think that government should change marital laws to be something that’s more fair, not realizing that the issue is not whether the terms are good or not, but who decide.

Many of what I learn is very surprising.

Am I a christian? In a sense that most christian would disagree, I think I am.

For example, I learn that many of what Jesus said is surprisingly right. Faith does move mountain. Check truth riddle number 2 if you don’t believe me. A better proof will be a concept called focal Nash equilibrium. I can explain all that in detail.

Jesus did have good advices. Love your enemies could simply mean being a little merciful and some carefully selected strategic appeasement to them. Of course, he never said to love our enemies and parasites more than we love ourselves, which is what the liberal and christians demand everyone else to do.

Hitler killed jews and hence didn’t have nukes. Then he slaughtered serbs and hence didn’t have grain. Then he lost big and we wonder why racism is the most politically incorrect traits nowadays. The same way, libertarians propose that we should let the poor starve and hence don’t get many votes.

Hitler’s ally, the japs, claimed to be Asian’s “big brother” and pretty much capture the whole south east asia without war. Perhaps a little compassion to others did the trick.

Rather than dropping more bombs to Middle East, why not drop happiness? Drop porn. Drop ecstasy. And the only losers will be that khomeini guy.

However it’s kind of tricky to do so if even in the land of the pee, those 2 are politically incorrect. As Jesus said, we should remove the block in our eyes first before bombing blocks on middle east.

The same demon that turn nazis into exterminators, and muslim youths into suicide bombers is most likely the same one that turn christians in US to prohibit drugs and prostitution. They’re even most likely encoded by the same genes. That kind of demon can only be exorcised with heavy dose of porn or perhaps evolutionary psychology explanations.

Then I learn that the greatest human is Tao and the greatest Tao is just a normal typical human being. That explains why most people have self delusional faith. It works, at least partially, and in many cases. Observing chimps also help understanding our true natures.

After all, humans need to reconcile their false politically correct fairy tales they consciously aware with the politically incorrect but factually proven algorithm their instincts know. Of course they bullshit themselves. What else could they have done?

Dawkins say that that our selfish genes are on the driver seats. Then he extended that idea to memes. By another small extension, our traits are our true self. Just like a country consists of a lot of people, the same way one man consists of a lot of traits and preference.

Just like some country are free market democracy and follow the will of all their people, quite literally, the same way some man listen to their emotion. The latter are more successful.

The idea that traits are “selfish” or a true self is buddhist.

For example, this is a buddhist strategy that would work. Love sinners hate sin. The same way, don’t hate terrorists. Hate their anti freedom traits by dropping more and more porn and we would have killed our true enemies living the innocence intact.

Now that would be a true weapon of moral destruction. Any kind of moral that opposes free fair competition should be destroyed anyway.

So, in a sense, I am an amateur evolutionary psychologists, game theorists, NLPist, christian, taoist, and buddhist.

Am I a satanist? Well, in atheistic sense, I could be. I am closer to deist or agnostic actually. However, who is Satan and who is God is very flexible, if you’re an atheist.

I can start seeing God (=free market?) telling all of us, “Have any consensual sex all you want, just don’t get married. The day you’re married will be the day you’ll die.” Then I see Satan, (=government?) telling, “Didn’t God tell you that all sex are prohibited, except if you exalt me to be the pimp and sign a legally binding life time monogamous government enforced contract where you can lose more than half your wealth?” God never told that!

I see many people are deceived, get married, sign a demonic pact called civil marriage, and ended up paying a lifetime alimony to girls that are already riding someone else’ cock. In a sense, that man is already death the day he’s married.

Doing so is worse than death. Rewarding those that screw you will exterminate not just your life, but all that are like you, your traits, your true self.

That’s hell. They’ll never get out of it. Not unless they went berserk and kill their ex and the judge and the bastard kid or themselves, which will lead them to an even deeper hell. Or they can embrace globalization and escape to another country. Salvation is near thanks to free market, even on those who are in alimony or marital hell.

Prohibitions of a more sensible arrangement like prostitution are simply genocide against capitalists.

It just reminds me of Jesus words: Don’t make a vow (including marital vow) because you don’t even know whether your hair can fall or not, let alone whether your kids will be yours if you’re married, unless you write and study your own marriage contract first. Who does?

Jesus also told us to know the truth, and the truth will set you free. How do we know the truth? Wikileaks is one thing. Paternity test is another. That one should have replaced marriage a long time ago. Porn is another. Just look at what Satan tried to censor and we’ll be on some right path on seeing God’s true plan: abundant free market that brings prosperity to all.

Well, if Jesus is right on some aspects of life, maybe he’s right on others.

“What would Jesus do?” ask most Christian. Very well, on this one aspect I think I am going to follow him.

Legalization of prostitution or drug will be a victory for all capitalists. If those 2 are legal, the most successful variant among humans’ species will be those providing the best service to the most customers. Victory for capitalists will be victory of all men.

If that’s the goal, then porn will be the gospel. Now, spread the gospel, make everyone my disciple (except for my spelling and grammar). If any country would reject that gospel, just leave (but spam their forum anyway). On the day of judgment that country will suffer more than north Korea.

Incoming search terms:

  • better way to introduce myself

November 8, 2010

Income Taxes for The Rich and Poor

My first business course is about tax.

I used to think that the more money I make the more tax I have to pay for my enemies. For many years it doesn’t motivate me to get rich. Many people do not want to get rich quite literally. You asked them, “Do you want to be rich?” and they will say, “No I just want to have enough”.

The truth is a little hidden.

Think about it. Money can go anywhere freely under globalization. Yet people and most workers can’t go anywhere just as easily. Now put your self in the shoes of legislators that want more entertainment money and pay raise.

Would you tax the poor workers or the rich?

Surely in vain is the net spread out before the eyes of any bird.” – Proverb 1:17

Okay, so goods and cash, and the rich, has wings, quite literally. In fact, cash has more than wing. It can teleport quite literally faster than the speed of light. The rich are smart. Anything government do is under their watchful eyes. And yap they got wings.

My guess. The rich don’t pay a lot of tax. At least not enough to demotivate them from making money.

Think about it.

You pay income tax. Why not capital tax. Why not gasoline tax. Why not wealth tax?

Ah but the rich have higher income. Well define on how you define rich. Normally rich means having a lot of money. Not a lot of income. Workers have lots of income. Productive diligent workers have a lot of income. They can be rich too. But not always. Productive dilligent workers that spend money clubbing all the time is not rich for example.

Productive dilligent workers that keep spending money trying new biz is not rich too.

Now, income is hard to define. Think about it. It has 2 components

1. Money you spend

2. Money you don’t spend (yet).

Now how do income tax work.

If you’re a worker your income is your salary. If you earn $10k per month, for example, and you save $4k and spend $6k. How much is your income? $10k. If you spend it all, how much is your income? $10k. If you save it all and go on hunger strike protesting the system, how much is your income? $10k.

Not much you can do if you’re worker. Just like what Robert Kiyosaki said.

Now you’re a businessman.

1. You spend money for food, office, house. All those are not income. Those are expenses. After all, we need expensive food to impress potential business client. We need big house and office for the same. It’s branding. Or so called. So money you don’t spend is not income either. Business lunch is tax deductible.

2. What about money you don’t spend? Imagine if you can arrange that those are not income yet so you don’t pay tax yet. You can. You own land. The value of the land increase. Do you pay tax on that? No. You pay it latter when you sell the land if ever. You spend money on advertising. The value of your biz improve due to higher expected future cash flow that will come due to advertising. In short, your stock price went up. Is that taxable income? No.

Governments’ know that the rich have wings. They knew they can’t take the rich. That’s why they make so many loopholes. They have to. Otherwise, the rich won’t bother investing at all and move to somewhere else.

Stop thinking that the richer you are the more socialist bigots will suck you dry. Think that the richer you are, the more free you will be, and the more bargaining position you have against those bigots.

And if those legislators want  more entertainment money, they’d better kiss up, not kick down.

Think about it, and you’ll see why you want to be rich.

I always thought that the poor is screwing the rich. And no the other way around doesn’t work either.

The fact is, the poor is in hell, the rich is in heaven.How much we wish we want to help those in hell to be in heaven too. But they can’t. Not just they can’t physically. They can’t change their mindset either.  They’re just stuck in their mindset, like I too WAS. The way things are taught up to us in schools and in media is there to deceive.

We can complaint a lot about how we’re not free.

Guess what, I went to a club. Guess what I found? Striptease, ecstasy, alcohol (in the reverse order of dangerous). Who said it is illegal? My country, Indonesia, is the most free country in the world if you KNOW the road.

The same way, US is a tax haven, if you CAN pay lawyers.

There are general rules, and plenty of exceptions.

October 16, 2010

Jesus the Success Life Coach

Many people use Jesus words as justification of their political agenda. Well, that’s another issue. Today I want to see Him as something different.

What about if Jesus is not an ethical teacher that teach  you how to get to heaven. What about if what He said can actually be PROFITABLY applied for REAL benefit in THIS life.

That could be pretty unintuitive. After all, many Jesus’ advice is quite suicidal. And that’s the very reason why his teaching is popular. Too many people want to promote suicidal advices.

Nobody is actually practicing what He said. They just insist that the rest of us do because they want us to fuck our self up for them.

But with a little “creative” interpretation, it could actually be something quite lucrative. And who knows it’s the correct interpretation.

Let’s examine one of the case. Be fair and merciful. Jesus claimed that it’s the essence of all Torah.

If you’re fair, you properly align people’s interest with your interest. So people want to be fair. Being fair is then sort of like an end to itself because it’s profitable. If you’re merciful, then you step on less toes. You make less enemies and more friends. There is a lot of people that want to be fair for say 20% of their interests. Those people will then be nice to merciful people.

Then you have a lot of friend and biz partners. Then because you’re fair, you profit those who profit you. Then more people want to profit you. Because you’re merciful, you start of this positive feedback lucrative relationship with more people. Then ever wonder why the rich get richer? Yea they got thousands of fan on their back wanting them to get richer. Employees, families, judges, cops, politicians, and who knows what.

Yes, Jesus’ words, unlike classical economy, contains plenty descriptions of positive feedback system! And positive feedback system is the key to achieve anything BIG.

And yes the richer got richer. As Jesus said. To those who have, more are given. To those who doesn’t, the little he has is taken from him.

What’s more here can’t possibly be just money. It’s skills, connections, mindset, traits the rich have that they keep having more and more above the rest. It’s incomplete to say that the rich are more dilligent, or more determined, or have more money and that’s how they got rich. The truth is the rich tend to have more of everything, and keep getting more because they have more.

As we practice the heavenly profit path we get rich. When we get rich, we get laid. Women prefer the rich. What matters is not how rich we are. What happen is how rich we are relative to the rest. Those who are not getting it then get relatively poorer under capitalistic societies. Then they didn’t attract biz partners and get relatively poorer again.

Or what about this. Faith can move mountain. Way to go. It’s a very important concept in game theory. It’s called Nash Equilibrium. Nash Equlibrium is like a blackhole that can attract situation. The more people believe in a Nash equilibrium the more they believe on it, the more they count on it, the more they bet on it. Once they bet on it, the sort of want it to happen.

Imagine 2 kings, Bob and Ann competing to be an emperor. Say more people believe that Bob got mandate of heaven. Then more people would fight for Bob. Then Ann’s followers will get crucified naked along with their whole family while Bob’s followers will rape hot cunts. Once you believe Bob is the winning team, and start putting that faith into action, say by massacring Ann’s followers, you’d better hope Bob do win. Lest you ended up like Nazis in Nuremberg’s trial.

Uhuk uhuk… Don’t judge. Just learn. And you’ll go to achieve great fortune. When that happened, who are we to tell that Bob is evil? Who are we trying to remove a speckle from a savvy politician’s eyes while our own  eyes are blocked by a bucket of bullshit called norms, morality, and ethics often without questioning where all those really come from.

And what about giving the other cheek? Well, a slap is an attack against your pecking order. It doesn’t cause significant bodily or monetarily harm.

Imagine if you’re a jew and a roman soldiers slap you. Well, you can slap back, but that means crucifixion. However if you yield, the roman soldier also has another choice. He can keep beating you. But what does that mean? What would happen if we keep beating the fuck out of those that already yield to us? No body wants to yield to us anymore. Not a good idea. Of course, this strategy won’t work against those with not much reputational cost. Still Jesus could mean something around that area.

It’s once said that Keynes, one of the richest nobel prize winner in economy, once said that he’s heavily criticized by the commies. He said it’s quite good that the conservative capitalists are cursing him too. So here is a tip for true christians. Offend everyone equally. For that way you get slapped by both side.

Or what about George Bush that got shoes thrown at him. Imagine if it’s Saddam that got hit by shoes. George, which was the most powerful man on the earth, chose a light attitude. The shoe thrower got a light sentence for the physical damage he causes. However, he isn’t penalized for the magical damage of lowering George’s peking order.

And what about that the greatest among us are those who serve? Yap. Free market capitalism. The greatest among capitalists are the those providing the best service to the most customer. What else? A great idea ha. The greatest idea ever. It’s said that even Adam Smith himself is not a smart mathematician. He is inspired by Jesus actually. Lots of good things are inspired by religions, in ancient time. Now all the good ideas move to science, blogs, and internet.

The smart don’t bother using religions anymore to make their point because they now have plenty of evidences anyway. But how the hell they have plenty of evidences that an idea works? Because we tried the idea. And why did we try an idea? Because some lunatic believe in an unintuitive nonsense called religion telling us to believe it’s a cool idea. Religions used to be quite fine till like 50 years ago. That’s another huge topic. No I don’t look up to religions. I won’t look down to it too much too. Nowadays, I would say most religious ideas sucks. But that’s another huge topic.

And what about seek first the kingdom of God/heaven and it’s truth and all will be added to you? Perhaps heaven ways are ways that works no matter how the situation. I like Math because a few rules in Math govern all things. Perhaps Jesus wants to teach us that by understanding a few rules that govern all things we can kick ass, quite obviously.

Say we’re fair, merciful, and capitalistic, for example. Then we wouldn’t need to worry about what will we eat, or what will we wear, or how wide our TV is, or how big our house is. Why worry of what we eat, if rice comes cheaply from Vietnam. Why worry about what we wear if textiles come cheap from China.

When we give to what other’s ask, namely opening our market, then we can concentrate on what we’re good at and have abundance. Or sort of.

Yea give to those who ask for it. Contrast that with so many people that are giving us protection against things we never want. Males protect women from polygamy and prostitution. Religious bigots protect us from drugs, and porn. Did they even bother to see what we’re really asking? Compare that to capitalists. Bigots are asking for T shirt with Che’s picture. Capitalists give what others’ ask, not what they think others’ should be asking. Giving to those who ask is then one principle of capitalism. We give what others’ ask so we too, get what we are asking.

Perhaps giving here means selling at cheap price after further lowering marginal cost. Jesus, after all, is a  jew.

And what about find the truth and the truth will set you free. Here is some truth. Jesus said that prostitute will go to heaven faster than religious expert. Jesus turned water into wine, suggesting that it’s okay to get drunk, smoke ecstasy, marijuana. If anything, the bible actually teach us to give wine to those who are doomed.Imagine if we legalize marijuana for anyone that don’t have kids. There goes poverty.

And when Jesus says that people shouldn’t get a divorce, his disciples quickly ask, “Why marry?” Yea. Why bother? Marriage rates, measured by numbers of babies born within wedlock drops to 50% in US when congress makes tough alimony laws that makes divorcing a bitch. Why get married? What’s wrong with wine? Do you feel free already?

Perhaps there is something there. Some truth that’s difference than what religious bigots want us to believe. Knowing those truth would set us free, and that means deprive bigots from slaves. Why else church opposes translating bible 500 years ago? Somehow they knew, that easier access to “truth” will indeed set people free. God can be way more libertarian than religious rulers.

And what about plucking our eyes if it deceive us. Does porn deceive you? Doesn’t look that way to me. If anything porn allow males to more accurately access product quality. Porn is not deceiving. Clothes are and burqha are. Perhaps, the eyes here mean any irrational bullshit. You wouldn’t want to have that kind of eye anyway. Lest you end up in gas chamber following inaccurate political strategy.

Imagine if you live in a country. Say some people says that free market doesn’t work. Would it make sense to pluck that deceiver out to Gulag and keep embracing free market? Yea capitalists don’t use high handed means to exterminate even vermin that hate them. Aren’t capitalists true Christians? But even if we do, we’re still good. Just look at what commies do to bourgeois in communist countries. I am not suggesting that we should kill commies. But we should remember that we are already too nice for them.

And what about the idea that our father in heaven gives rain to those who are evil and good. Imagine if you’re God. Imagine if you insist that only the good guys get rain. Now it’s even more difficult and costly right?

A miracle is like debugging a program. So you have this computer program called universe. Then you have to create a miracle. So you press that break button, point the debugger to the right place and change the variable. If you keep doing that then you’re not a good programmer. Good God do few miracles.

For that same reason capitalists, unlike Bob’s supporter, benefit not only those who love capitalism but also those who hate us. Aren’t we like God already? Lowering cost of SEO to those who are good and evil alike?

So benefiting everyone, even those that hate us is what differentiates the good guys from the normal guys. After all, even Hitler loves his allies. Even commies take care their comrades. But capitalists benefit everyone. And that’s why we’re the good guys.

We put PC, and software, and information on the fingertips of commies and capitalists alike. That’s not so “up there” isn’t it. We did it for our own profit. We don’t deliberately try to help those bigots. If anything we prefer not to. Our left hand don’t know what our right hand is doing, as Jesus said. But it means a lot for everyone right? That’s why more and more people embrace capitalism and globalization.

What else. Jesus claimed that he doesn’t cancel the Torah but completed it. Let’s put an example. In one hand he said sort of look like he’s canceling the eye for an eye commandment. Well not demanding an eye for an eye sort of explains, perhaps, the true original intent of the commandment. It’s not really an eye for an eye. It’s really mean that we should minimize damage to anyone’s eyes in the first place as if their eyes are our own eyes. Of course without an eye for an eye rules some crooks would pluck out many people eyes say when robbing and hence why the law is necessary. However, any other arrangement that sort of work to properly align our interests would work fine too.

That being said, an eye for an eye, called tit for tat, is the algorithm that win a repeated prisoner dilemma’s game made by Robert Axelrod. So while the original intent is not to have anyone’ eyes plucked, perhaps the best way to do it is to indeed have an eye for an eye rule.

And what about do unto others what others want to do to you? The first thing people think is I want people to give me money so I should give money away. Let’s think again. Do we really want people to give us money out of pitty? No. We want them to be fair to us. We want them to pitty us only when we’re in really really fuck up situation. So we treat others fairly too. Ayn Rand once said that he will never sacrifice someone else for his interest nor will she sacrifice herself for others. I think Ayn is not far from kingdom of heaven.

And what about not judging? One day I was in a Spa and I see an Irian. I’ve heard about how in Irian their officials used up a lot of the people’s money. I didn’t like politicians. I judged them evil. So I didn’t exchange contact with them.

But what did I know? In a world where so many people opposes free market, we need corrupt leaders to counter the evil will of socialist and religious bigots. These corrupt officials serve an important social function. Also he has something I don’t, power. And that guy was very polite to me. Next time I meet him I would learn from him. Perhaps I can be a rich dictators too.

After all, aren’t we all politicians? We break laws when we think we won’t get caught. And all politicians make so many laws that everyone is criminal anyway to maximize control. If we blame those, aren’t we like commies that blame capitalists while they themselves do not understand money? The same way, we blame politicians for having so much power while we, our self, don’t bother learning how political power works.

That being said, kingdom of heaven may have a version that’s more real. Something on our own mind that get us things. If after we die there is another judgement that put some additional benefit, it’ll be a different story. I don’t know. However, perhaps some rewards for following some heavenly path is right here right now. Out of the fruit we know the seed. Just try. If things work well and we get richer. Then good. If not, the idea may come from Satan.

My favorite is the story of Samaritan. Jesus said that we have to love our neighbor. Then the jew asked, who is my neighbor. Jesus said that your neighbor is those who have mercy on you. So what is he really saying? Be nice to those who are nice to you. Simple. Who among us wouldn’t want to help those who have helped us when we’re in need? If I am dying on a street and some guy helped me, wouldn’t I be very grateful to that guy? Wouldn’t it be to my be best interest to be nice to those who are good to me? Good to those who are good to me and ignore the rest sounds like pretty sound life strategy.

To be frank, I wasn’t sure on what Jesus is. No body knows whether the gospel is even true or not. He only showed up for like 3 years and changed the world so much. The gospel mentioned 4 passovers. Like Buddha, He is not something we should just ignore and move on.

Incoming search terms:

  • light positive feedback
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Loading...