Let me try to understand. That’s where we differ A LOT.
So, you think libertarian position is: Drum roll…
Government does have right to limit the number of child a rich father can make.
Then you said this better than my self:
Having more children than the “replacement rate” is CHILD ABUSE
Is that what you’re saying?
1. Government has no right to prevent the poor to keep breeding children. In India and Indonesia, for example, child of the poor are just starving and government should just let that happen. But it’s legal to keep breeding kids you can’t afford to educate, clothe, and feed.
2. Yet government does have a justifiable case to limit the number of child rich smart males can make.