Why rich smart attractive males avoid marriage? Why religions teach you to get married? Why feminazis prevent consenting females from accepting high paying jobs and escaping patriarchal oppression? Why force and deceit are often more politically correct than consent in getting a mate? What should you do to help your self?
Say you are a regular customer of Talibcomp, the only computer suppliers in your country. Say you used to pay $100k for a punch card computer.
The rest of the world have move on to faster computers that can do far more for far less.
Femintard, a consumer advocacy advocate, says that your supplier should change their culture. Punch card computers are outdated and is way below industry standard.
However, quite frustratingly and unsurprisingly, Talibcomp does not have the incentive or the mean to change. Their technology is simply too low. They believe that their computer manufacturing technology is sacred as given to them by their great inventor thousands of years ago. Most importantly why should they improve what they offer if you keep buying from them anyway?
But why would you keep buying from Talibcomp? Why not just import computers from others? Well the thing is Talibcomb prohibit all other computer stores from coming. Talibcomp even go so far prohibiting all alternative to their computer, like Sempoa, paper, pencils. Quite often, mere living under Talibcomp’s sphere of influence means you can ended up being forced to buy punch card computers under pain of death.
Well that’s fine. Why not just go to other countries and buy computers there?
Here’s the thing.
Other countries are governed by another computer regulator called Femintard. Femintard argues that because the deal you got is so bad, it’s not really a choice. Hence, ALL alternative choices are not really consensual irrelevant of whether the consumer consent or not.
Anyone helping consenting consumers to buy better computers in better countries are guilty of consumer trafficking. Consent is not a defense against consumer trafficking charge because customers don’t really consent due to the badness of their original deal.
Also because other suppliers supply your computer out of selfish interest rather than altruistically trying to help you, unlike what Femintard claims, they are exploiting you. Other computer suppliers like Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Gateway, are then jailed for trying to exploit customers like you.
All their distributors are also jailed for assisting exploitation through pimping consumers to suppliers that consumers do prefer.
What about if you go out to another country first, hang out for a year, and see if other computers are indeed better. Then there should be no doubt that you consensually pick better computers or not. Should you prefer Talibcomp computers instead, you can always go back to Talibland and be customer of Talibcomp again.
The thing is Talibcomp have harsh terms against those that go outside for better computers and then coming back. They pretty much have harsh terms against anything actually and their customer service always get mad for who knows what.
Simply put, Talibcomp will kill such customers. Hence, once you go out and buy better computers, you can’t really go back.
So Femintard argues that precisely because Talibcomp is such an asshole, your choice of other computers is not consensual. Hence, the whole business of helping customers to go outside Talibcomp sphere of influence and buy better computers is not consensual and should be prohibited as any customer trafficking should be.
And that’s how you keep ended up buying expensive punch card computers even though all other consumers are already getting far better deals light years ahead. And that’s also why some people keep producing punch card computers.
Now, replace Talibcomp with Taliban and Femintard with anti consensual women trafficking feminists. See if the analogy make sense.