The issue is not really the sanctioning per se… The issue is government can effectively tell women don’t choose Bob, choose Charlie instead. In US, that’s what government do if Charlie is single. In muslim countries that’s what government would do if Charlie is muslim.
Imagine if government has power to tell customers don’t buy iPhone, buy Samsung instead? Apple and Samsung won’t bother doing R&D to build better phones. They just bribe government official. The same way men don’t bother offering best offers for women. They just pay religious leaders, and feminazis to rule in their favor. Many hot babes are then underpaid.
The following are things that should be legalize because there isn’t any argument prohibiting it:
1. Polyandry. While there are plenty of arguments against polygamy, most of which only apply to males having many wives. The idea that no women are willing to share, for example, may be valid for females. There is no way it’s valid for males. Many males including me do not mind sharing one hot babe. In fact, I’d rather share a hot babe than be the only one for an ugly fat bitch. Another argument against polygamy is that women are forced into it. Well, who knows what women want. One thing for sure is I won’t feel being forced to share Miyabi. Finally polygamy is not inconsistent with democracy of one man one vote. That last one is the one that make some sense to me, but only if sex outside marriage is illegal. Still, there is no where in history where polyandry concentrate power in the hand of 1 women.