If you have a daughter, don’t you want your daughter to end up with the best of the best? Millionaires, billionaires or someone with high IQ? If you have a son, do you want your son to end up like Beatty Chadwick? Do you want your son to get married at all? What do you want for your sons or daughter anyway. I want to know my self.
How the relation works out is secondary. It could be casual sex. It could be sugar babies. It could be formal marriage. It could be religious marriage. He could be her boss (as long as it’s the actual owner rather than just supervisor). Who care?
Let me try to understand. That’s where we differ A LOT.
So, you think libertarian position is: Drum roll…
Government does have right to limit the number of child a rich father can make.
Then you said this better than my self:
Having more children than the “replacement rate” is CHILD ABUSE
Is that what you’re saying?
1. Government has no right to prevent the poor to keep breeding children. In India and Indonesia, for example, child of the poor are just starving and government should just let that happen. But it’s legal to keep breeding kids you can’t afford to educate, clothe, and feed.
2. Yet government does have a justifiable case to limit the number of child rich smart males can make.