Free Market Forever

November 16, 2010

Positive Attitude Error and Negative Attitude Error

That’s correct Mama. What I learn recently is that not looking at what might go right (I am not saying in government, they almost never go right, but in situation in general), is as wrong, if not more wrong than not looking at what might go wrong.

It’s so often we get screwed and choose not to trust or do biz with anyone. Before we know it, we’re not as rich as we should have been.

Anyway, my optimist attitude in your situation will be shooting down the rapists. My pessimistic just in case attitude would be to call 911 just in case I missed my first 6 shots.

I don’t trust government either. Not my government. And well, your government is not that different, to my surprise.

However, I sort of learn that things do go up. Not in government, and not for government. Actually government will get less. Things do go up because I have high hope with the market, not only being the best system, but sort of “defend” itself as life goes on.

Think it this way. It’s not a coincidence that socialist countries are ruled by dictators. It’s not a coincidence that mass murderers often have high risk of dying themselves when their political calculation went wrong.

When societies choose not to be fair, people will fine ways to maximize their profit through unproductive means. Everybody get screwed. Everybody then has interest to embrace a system that’s more fair. I am not saying a perfect libertarian ideal. That’s far ahead. But slowly and surely, better system works out. Also things that do go wrong, often address some greater wrong in the past, like in Karma. Karl Marx bitch about capitalism because in ancient time, wealth means land and land is seized through power. Of course, nowadays it’s not true. People doing Karl’s idea went broke. They all are following US footstep, which is better. Not perfect, but better. We’re not an idiot. All humans want to get rich too.

I am not saying that things will just go right by itself. Of course if you’re an idiot that just say aye to all false accusation against you then you’ll still be death. Here, by just being selfish (and not in objectivist sense, maybe more in Machiavelli sense), you sort of self balance the world. I am not a satanic by the way. I am more of an semi agnostic christian.

Also if you ignore illusions of fairness, legal, illegal, morality, prohibited, etc. You’ll see that there is some practical aspects that’s more real on that. And if you really see what you can actually do, you see that you are actually far more powerful and free than what others would ever allow.

If you believe emperor’s is God’s chosen, then you’ll be stuck in the mentality of doing what government’s said. However, if you see that governments are humans, just like you. You too can stab them in the back. You too can break their laws and not getting caught. You too have huge bargaining position. Then, as Jesus said, “You will know the truth and the truth will set you free.” Your government know you can do that. That’s why they “moderate” their laws on those they know are already enlightened.

Sometimes, huge amount of freedom is to just see things the way it really is.

In my countries, drug and porn is illegal. Everybody are told not to go to night club because bad people go there. You guess it. So what? We’re not free? The fruit of knowledge is the one’s forbidden. Go to any night club in Indonesia, and you’ll never watch striptease in US again.

Who says you don’t have a choice? Recently a guy that help companies avoid taxes are put in jail. So? He’s traveling to Bali watching Tennis after “permission”. I can only wonder why he doesn’t go to another country instead. I bet he can. Many suggested Suharto to be declared hero, after using his power to extract a lot of money from the population. Hell, you can even kill a judge in Indonesia, and get away within 5 years for good behavior if you’re as rich as Tommy.

Tax too high? Well, if you do it right, then all your expensive lunch is biz lunch. What about if you’re not consumptive? Say you own a land. The value of the land go up. Do you pay tax on that? Say you spend money on advertising, your expected value of future cash flow go up. Do you pay tax on that?

Government knows that if there is no “steam” valve, the kettle would explode. For those who are enlightened the deal is sweeter.

If government demand too much against foreign investors, those investors would just leave. Or what about those that know that they too can harm others through politically correct means? Yea… Those dictators, corruptors, are getting sweet deals.

Jesus is quite right when he said that we have to pay what we have to pay. The question is, do we really have to? Quite often no. If anything, we can be paid rather than paying. It’s a choice too.

So who do we fight for? For ourself? No need. We can be the dictator himself, if we want to. For the world? Well, it’s the population that’s stupid enough demanding bigger government. Me, I just help my self, my family, my friends, and perhaps, fellow libertarian. The rest are just vermin to me.

Perhaps the problem with libertarians is that we are too good we do not want to harm others. The truth is, in the world full with evil, you’ll just get screwed offer if you’re the only sheep, or hedgehog. Open our eyes. See how everything is part of the game. Government cannot prohibits anything. Government can only provides intensives not to do things too often, and too openly.

We under estimate our politicians’ intelligence. We fail to realize that the people themselves are corrupt too.

As times goes by, I see that the market self enforce it self through less violent means. In Europe, people can vote with their foot. That’s the main, if not only, reason why europes get so advance. The other cause is they don’t get fucked over by mongols.

Globalization will mean that. Anyone gets screwed by their government can move somewhere else. Of course, if all government in the world is too bad for your standard, maybe your standard is the one too high? It’s like trying to buy apple for 1 cents. If no body is selling it for 1 cents, maybe the price is indeed 50 cents. The same way, no government is perfect just like no private biz is perfect. But competition among government will force each government to get more and more streamlined. Tax will drop. Marriage institution will go away. Prostitution will be legal. Porn will be more common.

At the end, people will be some form of customers, or stock holders of governments. The inefficient government will see their most talented businessmen, and most beautiful women moving out somewhere else. It’s happening.

Israel, for example, is a sample of a “relatively libertarian” countries. Jews got fucked over everywhere so they make their own country. I bet they don’t complain a lot as you guys when their so called country has income tax, for example. Just make more money and have fun.

As for rand paul. I like his attitude of rejecting the 2nd part of civil right movement. Yea he backed down. So what? It’s still a positive step compared to the rest.

[quote author=MamaLiberty link=topic=7875.msg35558#msg35558 date=1289926807]
genepool, sorry – I was being pretty flippant there.

But I think it goes a lot deeper than “positive” or “negative” thinking, important as that is.

First requirement for liberty and prosperity is self ownership and self responsibility. Without that, you’re a sitting duck for every snake oil salesman who comes along or gets “elected.”

Then, you MUST look at what doesn’t work, the down side, the negative… in order to learn and remember what happened and avoid doing it again. Don’t know about you, but I don’t want to relearn about hot stoves by putting my hand on it, each and every day. We must learn from experience, both good and bad.

Which isn’t to say that we must dwell on it and moan about it and flail around in our guilt for bad decisions. Not at all. The people who do that are actually those who think someone else should be responsible and “fix it,” rather than being self responsible and saying, “what next? Let’s try….”  …as you did.

There is a thin line, often, between self confidence and arrogance, assertion and imposition, aggression and self defense. We’d all like to think of these things as pure and easily determined, but 64 years of life has taught me it’s not that simple. We must examine those things and our actions/responses often, and many times agree to disagree.

So yes… prepare for the worst and expect the best. Just be prepared to accept the fact that the worst actually does still happen sometimes. Far too many people THINK they’ve prepared for bad things and times, but it was all superficial and they were fooling themselves.

[/quote]

October 10, 2010

Are Religions Getting Worse?

The christians often talk how often the brightest scientists are christians. Even Adam Smith didn’t really write wealth of nations based on math alone, but is motivated by christianity.

The muslims often talk about how in ancient time, muslim civilization are very advance relative to their peers.

A long time ago, “Protestant work ethic,” motivate Protestants to work more diligently and earn more money.

Jesus’ words that the greatest among us should be those who serve become a basis for capitalism.

In fact religions used to be capitalists’ main ally against communist hordes.

Nowadays, muslim religions are tell tale justification for terrorism, which is not part of market mechanism.

Christians simply demand less and less porn interfering with others’ choice to enjoy their live.

Naturally, countries run based on religious dogma earn less per capita income despite their often higher oil reserve.

Religious norms are often no longer compatible with free market, choice and productivity anymore.

What happened?

Let’s examine a seemingly different issue. In a seminar a speaker told me that in the “good” old day we can lend money by just shaking hand and things will work “fine”. Nowadays, people go through contract, with exit clauses, and check credit rating.

The speakers say things are getting worst. We can’t trust others anymore.

Perhaps the 2 problems are related.

The issue is competing market and techniques. Existence of a better technique or market, drive all the good deals to the better market. That left only the worst of the worst in the original market.

In the absence of a better market, we can often found gems in the original market. In ancient time, before the existence of credit rating, we can indeed shake hand and get an agreement and get paid.

Sometimes deals go well. Sometimes not. On average, because there is no better way anyway, we still make money. Because we only lend money to those we know, chance is we still get good payment rate and things still go well.

Kong Fu Chu said that it’s better to be betrayed by your friends than not to trust them. Around 2500 years ago, he could be right. That guy was pretty wise folks, for his time.

But things were not really better in the past. Interest rates were way higher. People were poorer. One reason is because lender needs to charge higher rates to compensate for the deadbeat borrowers.

Then we got credit rating and enforced contract. Any potential borrowers that are responsible to pay do not mind putting their neck on their mouth is. In exchange of that they get lower rate.

That left only crooks on the “shake hand” market.

The result is both way. In one way interest rates drop. Those who pay their loan got good credit rating. Overall credit market becomes more efficient. We all become more prosper.

But yea, you just don’t shake hand anymore. Those who insist on not signing contracts are usually the worst of the worst due to this adverse selection problem.

Shake hands, that used to be profitable, become bad.

The same way with religions.

Imagine a world where there is no rule not to steal from others. We would all steal from each other. Then we would all be poor. Well, our ancestors were indeed far poorer than us don’t they? That’s because they do not have rules against stealing and robbing from each others’ tribes.

However, on local level, things sort of work out. Tada, fortunately someone tell our ancestors, rightfully or wrongfully, that God wants us not to steal from each other.

In ancient time, there is no science or game theory. Saying God says so is the only way to convince people. So rules that bring prosperity, like not stealing, do come out of religions. Societies with better rules grow stronger.

Faith wasn’t that bad. If the idea was bad, then countries that practice it would be out of biz, replaced by “better” countries that embrace better ideologies. Of course, in ancient time, ideologies simply mean religions.

Religions spread along with the might and prosperity of those who follow it. “Bad” religions that suggest unfair laws that encourage stealing for example, get mowed down by societies that is fairer.

When it comes to encouraging prosperity, and cooperation, religions used to do quite a good job, for its time. All religions that are common nowadays are religions that used to sort of “work.”

Then something happen. A new market of idea show up called science. Well science and internet I suppose, where everyone gets ideas and information more quickly.

Knowledge and truth that used to be elusive become easy. Ease of information flow facilitates better cooperation resulting in more wealth.

Unlike religious ideas that are often hard to test, scientific data are much easier to verify. We now have the power to store, process, and distribute info way beyond what our ancestors can.

Bad ideas simply disappear under the light of this information. As time goes by, only the best of the best theories and ideas show up. If ideas are false or doesn’t work, it’s gone quickly.

Nowadays, Nobel Prize winners on economic and experts at game theories explain to us what the right ideology is based on math.

Because of that, overall things are going well. Technology becomes more advance.

That being said, those who have the best ideas no longer used religions to justify their point. We no longer need 10 commandments to convince us that free market rules sort of work. Free market works because, well, duh….

But then what would those with the worse of the worse idea go? What about those who care only to motivate the rest of us to sacrifice our interests for theirs? Obviously they can’t use science. So where did those ideas go? Religions.

Those who only want to screw everyone else demand that their ideas are respected and held sacred by everyone. Why? Because if we do not think that their ideas are sacred, we would question it and we would see that they’re just screwing us.

Before, even good ideas are held sacred. Now, only the worst of the worst ideas are held sacred. Good ideas do not need sacred status because it can easily withstand the scrutiny of scientific light.

Proponents of those ideas don’t care if people are cursing their ideas. They’re right anyway and want the light to shine more brightly so everyone can see how right they are.

Overall things get better. We become more prosper.

It’s just that as our knowledge shine and shine more brightly religious ideas simply get worse and worse.

March 18, 2010

Religions Do Not Create Politic. The Other Way Around is More True.

I think there is a porn bible. I forget who the comic writer is. The name start with R. It shows actual bible stories with lots of explicit nudity. Something like Milo Manara.

Bible actually tell us (well, Jews actually), to attack another country, kill all the male, and rape all the virgin females. What religion says and what bible says have little in common. Religions are always ways to justify political motives.

Because the political structure in ancient time differs than now, it’s only natural that religions then have different interpretation now than before. In ancient time, the king rules. So polygamy is okay (because all kings want it). Now, we are democracy. So polygamy is not okay because swing voters don’t like it. Very simple.

Pick any 2 countries with Similar religion and you see differing custom. In Indonesia, which is democratic by now, polygamy is very politically incorrect that congress start making laws banning it. In Saudi, a monarch, it’s a different story.

Pick any 2 countries with DIFFERENT religion, and you’ll see the same custom. Polygamy is politically incorrect in both Indonesia and China, for example.

If you ask a Christian what the bible says, you can predict what his political agenda is. That’s it. People prohibits porn and go to war not because they are pious. They do so because they hate porn and like war.

I am talking to some Jewish friends that claim that hebrew bible has different meaning than the way it’s translated. Well, I’d like to know if there is some 5-10% trace of a REAL GOD, in judaism or whether it’s just another folklore. 90% of religions are definitely product of secular imagination.

What’s really funny is I saw a book about how a Christian writer use Solomo as a sample on how to get rich. I was like, Come the fuck on. Solomo got rich because he oppressed the people.

In fact, tax was so high during Solomo’s time that the kingdom split into 2. The “Shiah” Jews, also called Judah, believe that king must be David’s decendant, and the “Sunni” Jews, called Israelites, or Samaritants then believe they can pick their own leader.

Huahem…. Again and again. Oh ya, they kill each other over dispute on whether God is in mount Zion or in mount Moriah or something. Just like Christians. Some cultures never change.

Incoming search terms:

  • milo manara jew

January 7, 2010

Are the Rich Less Generous

The problem is not people are less generous. People are MORE generous now than they are thousands of years ago. In ancient time, the poor got only 2% of money in Muslim countries.

Now we pay 30% income tax most of which goes into wealth redistribution. What else, given that the market can provide far superior service more efficiently anyway. So we are 15 times more generous.

World GDP is 300 times it was 200 years ago. Human race is 300 times richer.

If we have the same number of fuck ups now than we have 200 years ago, non of those fuck ups will be “poor” by 1800 standard.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is the fuck ups, irresponsible, lazy, stupid, socialists bigots out breed the prudent, smart, diligent and hard working. The problem is we got smart people like HaRRo that are too willing to sacrifice himself in altar of socialism to fed the parasites. Sorry HaRRo. We got to repent.

Anyone opposing freedom want to enslave others. Yielding to their kind is like cutting our own hand throwing it to lions hoping the lions will become vegetarian. If anything, the lions will just breed and breed and kill us.

If you run the fastest you simply have to show that you too can hit the hardest.

I love poor people. Many of them work hard for me and we both make a lot of money. None of those that work hard for me work as hard as me though. But well, we’re getting somewhere.

It’s the mindset that’s wrong. We encourage the poor to breed by subsidizing those that make kids. When subsidy is given, supply and demand curve no longer meet creating surplus of humans, causing unemployment giving rise to more justification for bigger government in never ending vicious poverty cycle.

Just pay anyone that don’t have kids and legalize commercial sex so the best brightest richest (like our mods) can knock up all the hot babes. Then encourage porn so no ugly women get laid. Hell those ugly feminists can always enjoy their right becoming astronauts, programmers, scientists, or some grenade thrower in the front line anyway. I totally support affirmative action for all womyn that want to throw grenade in the front line, if they’re ugly.

Within 1 generation, all kids will have rich smart dad and hot sexy mom. No need to resort to violent to “exterminate” those we deem inferior.

But even those benign peaceful method is politically incorrect. We’re like gladiator being forced to kill each other by our leaders with their irrational faith based “morality”.

September 29, 2009

Is Marriage Obsolette

Anything endorsed by government outside prohibition of fraud and force is most likely obsolete, from traditional market to public education and to marriage. If it’s not obsolete, government does not need to endorse it. The market would promote whatever system that would provide the best option for the market player.

In detail:

In ancient time marriage serves some legitimate market purpose. Rich males want to inherit their wealth. They need to know which kid is his biological child. Of course. I wouldn’t want to work hard all my life if I ended up giving money to someone else’ kids.

In ancient time, there is only one way for a male to know for sure whether the kid is his. He can only knows that by ensuring that the kids’ mother mate only with him. That then becomes marriage.

Society also has legitimate interests. Imagine if we have a child with no known father. Are we going to let the kid starve to death? I wouldn’t do it to a kitten. But if we help the kid that’s not victimless. Tax payer ended up paying. Also it encourages some males (if not eventually most) to just make kids and don’t bother supporting it. So in ancient time, requiring marriage does have a reasonable cause.

Now, those purposes mean less.

1. We can always know who the kid is by blood or DNA testing. Far more practical than say stoning wifes that mate with other man.
2. Marriage increase, rather than decrease, a male chance from having his wealth ended up supporting others’ kid. If you are not married and your mate produce a kid, you are not responsible for the child support. However, if you are married and your wife commits adultery, you are still responsible for child support. Also huge amount of socialism in all countries means that most of your earning will end up supporting those who make many kids anyway in the form of free education, free healthcare, free whatever.

Marriage also has one important aspect. This aspect will never get obsoletes. Life long monogamous marriage pretty much ration females (or males) in equal share for everyone. Hence we would expect many people that can’t get a high quality mate, will do their best to ensure that marriage is the norm.

As countries get richer, the males in those countries will have easier time to attract a mate. Those males tend to be more liberal and let the women choose, like in French or Japan, where women can walk naked on the street. The more a country is poor, the more restriction that their government will need to keep the peace. In Afgan, women can’t even work. In many poor countries women clits are cut of.

Imagine if women are as free in Afgan as they are in Japan, for example. All those women would have flaunted their naked tits openly and ended up marrying American tourists rather than local males. Quite predictably, most Afganistan males would condemn that.

If any of you want to help eliminating all governments endorsement for marriage institution (and hence making marriage truly obsolete), let me know how. I am all for it. Or please point me to a right forum. Let’s not bitch about the world. Either change our self to match the world or change the world to be a better place for us. Whichever is easier.

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress

Loading...