Free Market Forever

March 15, 2012

Can Economy Theory Explains Elimination of Poverty

I am always suspicious that there is a strong connection between economy and politic.

Before slaves are the only way to get things done better. So incentive to support slavery is high.

Then industrialization run high and low paid workers can get paid higher. More and more capitalists find it easier to just pay workers than enslave them. Obviously those workers want it too. Unfortunately, those workers can’t just move out. So there are bigger forces that want them to eliminate slavery. Either through democracy or through civil wars, those 2 forces fight and slavery is gone.

Slavery is not really gone. Slavery in a sense of menial workers forced to pick cottons are gone. But lifetime alimony is also slavery. Income tax is also slavery.

But perhaps history can repeat again.

Before, women are so valuable that men can only get them by trapping them into marriage system. In fact, in ancient societies, men pretty much rape women and all societies care is whether the man is responsible enough to marry her afterward.

This obviously hurt the interests of women and men with better offers. So rape and marry culture, which is pretty much slavery, is getting more politically incorrect and now it’s gone.

Nowadays, relationship between women and men with better offers are often criminalized. In western civilization monogamy norms ensure that the poorest dumbest males can get laid to. In muslim countries prohibition of all sex outside marriage ensures that women and men are trapped into marriage.

Many women prefer to be sugar babies of richer males than marrying a poorer males the way voters’ wish. However, the deal is borderline illegal.

Look at:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100410060955AAmW2n4

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080711095317AAGNPkp

While no body get arrested yet for being a sugar baby, perception that it’s illegal alone already turn of many people.

There are so many prohibition against various sex outside marriage that most people are pretty much forced to get married to stay in the gene pool.

Then disparity of wealth happen. There are plenty of men that are willing to pay women to be their mistress far bigger than a husband can do. Many beautiful (who care about the ugly) women obviously want them too.

So there are bigger and bigger incentive to decriminalize relationship between one rich males to many young beautiful girls outside governments’ control. Emerging Sugar babies relationship in US is a sample of those tolerance.

Feminists insist that marriage terms are extremely dangerous for rich males that fewer and fewer people want to get married.

So slowly, marriage trap is deteriorating and most people simply don’t get married. So marriage, like slavery is gone.

The same way with income tax and big government. In ancient time, the only way to get rich is to tax the people. Now we can get rich consensually too by hiring people rather than taxing people. We can think of capitalists bosses are competing with political bosses. Many capitalists can pay workers more than welfare checks. Obviously workers like that too. But welfare trap prevent those workers from working.

Obviously those capitalists bosses want workers to join their side. So as we get more and more prosper there are bigger and bigger demands for more freedom.

At the end, the world is getting more and more free as the results.

Something along that.

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB ancient cultures
  • powered by phpBB physics for kids
  • nakedgroupgirl
  • powered by phpBB ancient cultures wikipedia
  • powered by phpBB different branches of physics
  • powered by phpBB how s moderate drug use
  • ancient time fucking of women by man
  • money harem
  • human to make baby in ancient time
  • Hot naked babes from islamic countries
  • powered by phpBB cultures in usa

March 12, 2012

Affirmative Democratic Liberalism Manifesto

Liberalism is losing ground due to globalization. Tax for the super rich has to be sliced more and more. Middle classes are getting tired of paying for government and want to pick conservative candidates.

It’s on time like this, liberals need to be more vigilantes. We have everything liberal social democrat wants that may still work in this tight money session.

1. Affirmative action? Check. We support traits previously oppressed.

2. Democratic? Check. We support majority’s right to make sure that more people are happy.

3. Liberal? Check. We’re not conservative.

4. Big Government? Check. If you’re squeamish about counting on government to use force or fraud to get your goals done, then you’re not a liberal. Try libertarians. They never achieve anything.

Here are some of our main proposals.

Reduce Rape Through Mandatory Porn Consumption

In ancient time there are legitimate concerns that porn cause rape. Hence it is understandable that porn is prohibited in so many part of the world.

Some even go to 20 jails in prison for seeing mere drawings such as shown here: http://comipress.com/special/miscellaneous/down-the-slippery-slope-the-crime-of-viewing-manga

After all, we would do anything we can do to protect women from such heinous crime right?

However, more recent scientific finding shows that porn actually reduces rape rather than causing it. Here are the evidences: its lack of porn consumption that causes rape, not porn.

(T)here were 2.7 rapes for every 1,000 people in 1980; by 2004, the same survey found the rate had decreased to 0.4 per 1,000 people, a decline of 85 per cent. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/30/smut_freakonomics/

More can be seen by these

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/200904/does-pornography-cause-social-harm

http://reason.com/archives/2007/11/05/is-pornography-a-catalyst-of-s

The logical conclusion is obvious.

Because the benefit for society that all males watch porn is huge, the tradeoff between individual liberty and communal interest is reasonable. Therefore the state has a legitimate interest to encourage and enforce watching porn.

The interest of those who do not like porn means little because they don’t exist almost literally. Almost 99.9% of the world’s male population has watch porn. Studies that try to find the effect of porn are stopped because researchers cannot find the control group that has never watch porn.

Scientists at the University of Montreal launched a search for men who had never looked at pornography – but couldn’t find any. … “We started our research seeking men in their 20s who had never consumed pornography,” said Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse. “We couldn’t find any.”

Although hampered in its original aim, the study did examine the habits of those young men who used pornography – which would appear to be all of them.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/6543992/all-men-watch-porn-scientists-find/

This 99.9% statistic far surpasses statistic for mandatory health care, mandatory public school, various mandatory curriculum, and even previously mandatory anti porn rules that hit on 99% of males population.

So we support some state interference for truly worthy causes that can be supported by scientific evidences such as these.

Because virtually everybody loves porn anyway, the right of a small percentage that doesn’t can be sacrificed to protect our womyn from rape.

Hence, we propose:

  1. Mandatory porn watching in school
  2. Victims of rape can sue all producers of pornless movies for encouraging rape by failing to include porn on their movies.
  3. All movies should contain porn. Movies that do not contain porn will be rated XXX and can be watch by adult only.
  4. Consider all works that contain offensive literary, artistic, political, or scientific content to be obscene if the works, taken as a whole, lack porn value.
  5. Fight of invasion of Japanese hentai and jav by subsidizing local porn industry.
  6. I think bondage sadomasochist porn would be specially subsidized because that reduces rape the most.
  7. Those who have watch porn can proudly wear a badge of porn watcher. Because porn watchers are less likely to rape, such badges will be necessary to decide granting gun permit, etc.

Should we have stronger evidences that not watching porn can cause more rape or child abuse, we will have to take more extreme measures.

Not watching enough porn will be a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison, like what happened to Dwight Whorley. While it make sense that Dwight got 20 years for a heinuous crime he could have done, we’re putting the wrong guy in jail. It’s those who do not watch porn are the one that’s more likely to rape. So those who don’t watch should be the one jailed for 20 years.

Protect Women’s Dignity with Humanitarian 20 USD/Hour Minimum Wage for All Consensual Sex

It’s about time that we realized that equality is not enough for feminists’ movement.

Women need living wage. If they get paid lower than that they will actually have to study math and be engineers like men.

Having consensual sex for less than $20 per hour is not victimless. It hurts women’s market value and dignity everywhere. It could make men fail to notice women as valuable sex objects.

Earning too low for fucking hurt most women self-esteem. These turn many feminists into sex negative feminists causing so much suffering in 20th century.

Some women are epitomes of successful feminine role model. They can earn 5500 USD per hour as can be seen here http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hmXLonSBMNvhOli00jFF0fK65pSw.

Hence, we naturally conclude that any consensual sex where the female earn less than $20 per hour can’t possibly be consensual, inhumane, or simply not feminine.

Why would anyone that can earn $5500 per hour do it for free?

Moreover we have wasted so much police and court times to decide whether some sex acts are consensual or not such as in the case of Kobe here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant_sexual_assault_case. A contract stating she got paid should solve the issue much more efficiently.

Some additional safeguard will be placed to ensure that consensual sex acts are truly consensual.

Hence we propose:

  1. Some signed contract, in front of witnesses, testifying that she got paid will be mandatory to proof that sex is consensual. Otherwise, it’s she says he says, and who knows what’s true. Couples with that kind of dispute must fully pay all investigation and court costs they generate.
  2. Alternatively the sex acts can be done in public places so many people can testify that the acts are consensual.
  3. Minimum wage laws can remove jobs from low tier sex workers. We will provide free education so those women can upgrade their skills.

Regular minimum wage law is racists, as Ron Paul said. Hence it’ll be removed. Our $20 per hour minimum wage will ensure every knocked up hoes have enough money to support their kids and raise a family.

Remember, women are superior than men. Women studying math will be like CEO moping floors. They can. But most won’t. Only incompetent CEOs do that.

What about if some womyn cannot get more than $20 per fucking session? As a liberal, we believe that all disparity of outcome comes from unequal educational opportunity due to lack of governments’ funding for education. Women that can’t make $20 per fuck session will get free sex education to make them marketable if they can show they work hard enough to apply for those jobs.

Of course, they can also learn engineering. But again, it’ll be like CEOs moping floors.

Celebrate Cultural Diversity by Requiring Male Bosses to Reserve Time for Embracing Non Eurocentrist  Cultural Heritage of Ogling-Their Hot Young Secretaries

The idea that women are not mainly sex objects is an arrogant euro centrist nonsense.

While it’s true for the majority of ugly dumb feminazis bitches, it’s not true for pretty thin voluptuous goddesses sent from heaven to decorate our world.

That nonsense has deprived many hot young babes from huge career improvement opportunities. That same nonsense also has deprived many rich males out of easy mating prospects.

Asians consist of 50% of the world population. Asians have contributed significantly to American culture. Some notable positive Asian influence in western cultures include sugar babies relationship (founded by Asian), Ghettopoly games (made by Asian), proper understanding of evolutionary psychology (the most popular blog is written by an Asian that got fired by supremacist euro centrist feminazis) and tentacle art hentai (inspired by Disney). Those long proud Asian cultures are underrepresented in most offices due to euro centrist feminazis oppression.

Many young hot babes do not mind being ogled if doing so can help her career or even getting the job in the first place. Many of them yearn for worthy sperms to fertilize their eggs. Such sperms are usually produced by males with capital, power, and leadership capability like her boss.

Only young hot sexy babes are worthy to be ogled and get a raise amid that. Hence, not providing a raise and extra pay for ogle tolerant well-endowed beautiful girls is a discrimination against hot babes.

Currently many offices are forced to hire in favor of ugly bitches that don’t even like capitalists’ cock. Then bosses are forced to pay their female employees with paternity leave when the employee got knocked up by other males that do not pay her salary. Obviously our current requirement is far easier and more fun to comply than the current ones.

We realized that hot babes that don’t mind being ogled provide unique added values to normal enlightened red blooded bosses that can appreciate it. It’s important that all employers do not discriminate against sex hungry sluts that would do all to get ahead of their peers and breed good genes.

Hot babes willing to work and be ogled at the same time will improve societies’ workers’ competitiveness. It’ll be our edge to counter outflow of jobs to China and bring all those job creators back.

Hence we would propose:

  1. Any companies that receive government grant should enforce an improved opportunity employment for ogle tolerant hot babes.
  2. When a hot babe is interviewing for a job, should she ask, bosses need to disclose whether he is impotent or not.
  3. Each office needs to have a clear ogling policy and salary increase rate. That way, a hot babe with thousands of job offers can more easily compare one job offers for another where they can shine their talent most.
  4. Government would support national advancement of ogle tolerant hot babes in all industrial sectors.

End Women Oppression Everywhere and Assert Western Social Democracy Superiority by Bombing Talibans with Flyers Containing Porn Acts Done by Their Own Hottest Moms/Wives/Future Brides/Daughters

Taliban oppresses women. They prohibit women from wearing mini skirt, thong, and other sexy materials. They prohibit women from having sex with men without permission or for pay. Basically, Taliban punish women for being women.

The cure of all oppression is competition.

Sure capitalists make more money. Can capitalists compete with cavemen earning $100 per year to get laid? Sure they can. Social democracy let capitalists live and it’s about time they contribute to downfall of another conservative lunatics. Tell our capitalists to give the hottest Afghan women better offers. I’m sure they can come up with something worthwhile.

Why not let the women choose? Who knows some of those women prefer a much more modern culture than their retarded stone age $100 per month husband can offer?

Actually bombing them with real bomb will cause unnecessary collateral damage. Often little is achieved by all those bloodshed. We ended up killing liberal minded people too among them.

Not to mention the political and monetary costs of sending people to kill each other.

Perhaps there is a cheaper way to win the war and drive religious bigots out of the gene pool.

Give their hottest babes better offers.

I am sure a much smaller amount of money should be enough to persuade impoverished Afghanistan’s hottest babes to perform in front of camera and scream how much they like western cocks.

After all women prefer the rich and social democratic countries are way richer, usually.

When their parents, boyfriends, and husbands saw how awesome democracy is, they will have a strong incentive to embrace free market with all their heart and soul knowing that money is what gets men laid.

That is win win because we win twice.

Hence, we propose:

  1. Offering hot babes a chance to be porn star in countries where they are most oppressed.
  2. Turn them into porn stars.
  3. Show the proof of what some hot babes chose via cheaply produced fliers.
  4. Should there be any doubt that the hot babes are doing it non consensually, perform live straight in front of their tribes witnesses by UN observers.

While it’s totally nonviolent and victimless, religious bigots are so lunatic they may fight back violently nevertheless for who knows why. We already have a plan for that. Remember how ugly fat feminazis often want to fight on the front line?

Well, I suppose we can put them on the frontline to maintain peace with Taliban through anyway they can. We’ll treat them like males. They’ll decide what to do. Then we judge their performance based on result

Reduce Divorce Rate by Requiring All Marrying People to Fully Understand How Idiotic Getting Civil Marriage Is Before They Can Get Married

Marriage is a contract.

In a contract, we expect that those who agree to have fully read, understood, and agreed upon all terms in the contract.

Do you understand how owning a secondary resident in another state can affect your severance pay to your future ex-wife?

If you don’t, and I don’t either, it means we do not truly understand marriage and must not get married at all.

Marriage is a contract that is so bad no one could possibly agree to it consensually. In fact, nobody will agree to the kind of contract government made if not because so many alternative contracts are illegal. In fact, most people that agree to get married do not understand what marriage, as defined by the state, really mean.

Marriage is simply a bizarre prostitution term with lower pay but higher severance pay. This idiotic institution has destroyed so many lives that nobody in their rational mind would ever do so consensually. Governments all over the world have prohibited so many alternatives and censor many information to encourage people to get married.

Most marrying couples do not even know the detail of agreements they get into and better alternatives are often illegal.

Here are some samples of life destroyed by marriage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Beatty_Chadwick#cite_note-3

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/09/opinion/hitner-alimony-overhaul-pro/index.html

Anyone still wanting to get married is most likely a victim of religious and feminazis’ brainwashing, which should and can be cured.

Marriage is so devastating that allowing people to get married is like allowing people to sell themselves into slavery. Even if it’s allowed, some additional safeguard will be needed to ensure that the acts are truly consensual for those stupid enough to do it.

Hence we propose:

  1. Eliminate government’s recognition of any kind of marriage. All marital rules will be turned into a standard private contract that people can take.
  2. Any idiot that still want to get married and use that contract will simply have to go through common sense counseling. There, they will read all their marriage terms and all the various horror stories that can and will happen to them.
  3. After counseling, there will be a bar exam to test their understanding of marital laws and all that can and will go wrong when they get married.

Simpler contract, like he pay, she fuck, will always be a legal alternative option.

No Child Left Behind by Ensuring a Rich Smart Biological Dad for Every Child

Say you work hard to join the NBA by practicing basketball. Government has properly tax the rich and fund educational opportunity so you can compete with the best talent. You work in equally modern training room paid by government.

Unfortunately, your biological dad is a dwarf and your competitors’ biological dad is Michael Jordan.

I know. It’s unfair.

And we have a solution.

Currently greedy conservative capitalists are hoarding their wealth so they can distribute that on as few offspring as possible. While the kids of the poor get their money, the poor don’t get their genes, and hence still can’t compete. So why stop at redistributing wealth? Why not go all the way demanding redistribution of proven genes?

True equality requires a more drastic action. Hence we demand that:

  1. All rich smart heterosexual biological men must perform a community service of impregnating many beautiful women. Their quota should be proportional to their wealth. No more wealth hoarding from generation to generation. All their wealth should be redistributed in equal share for everyone to each of their male biological offspring.
  2. To make the job easier for the rich, we will abolish all laws that may make it more difficult for hot babes to pick the rich. So anti-prostitution laws, anti-sugar babies’ laws, and all governments’ regulation governing marriage will be gone. They can make their own contract.

Punish Conservative Pundit by Reducing Cost of Conservative Books and Make Them More Available For the Proletariat

Recently, a conservative bigot, Irwin Schiff, discloses our liberal secret that income tax is not constitutional.

All this time, government has been looting the rich illegally to support our comrades that don’t feel like working and just want to make babies.

We successfully murder Everret O Lasher, and Wanda Biggers to protect the secret. That way, we can support comrades that breed and breed and vote democrats.

While obviously justified, this awesome redistribution of wealth taken from oppressive capitalists would have been disturbed if people know that income tax is illegal.

Fortunately, our comrades high above manage to block the book from being sold. That forced Irwin Schiff to make the book available for free.

Loot conservative pundits’ intellectual property! Download Federal Mafia e-book. Conservative wisdom must be redistributed in equal share for everyone at cheap or free costs.

Use Positive Incentive to Encourage Young Males to Obey the Laws by Utilizing Hot Ukrainian Babes

Jails are expensive. Too many people are in jail for small crime like smoking pot. While pot itself can be legalized, the cost of prosecution shouldn’t be much higher than the amount of damage caused by petty crimes.

Sometimes, rather than punishing the guilty, we can just reward everyone and stop rewarding the guilty.

Well, positive incentive works better than negative ones. Rather than punishing every offenders to jail, why not give some positive incentive to all law abiding citizen and simply take that away from the bad guy. Jail and death penalty will be only used for really really bad crimes, which are fewer, and hence save cash.

There is a cheap alternative for jail. Most criminals are young males. Young males want hot babes to bang.

Rather than building more jails, we would hire women from poorer countries to serve all law abiding citizens. This will make all normal American girlfriends obsolete lowering their market value.

When someone breaks minor laws, we simply took away their ticket.

The women will be benefited because they can get a green card after only 365*5 sessions. Diligent hot babes can earn that within 1 year. This will improve market value of the states’ citizenship, which is the purpose of all government.

This will also reduce women trafficking. Why would anyone want to tolerate abuse in human trafficking expensively if they can be sex workers legally more easily?

Replacing All Socialized Program with Free Ganja for All Childless Adults

“Redistribution of wealth or face rebellion,” socialists say.

When societies get too out of balance social unrest increases. In the most extreme cases this leads to civil disturbance or revolution. This resentment against the wealthy may lead to their death or banishment and the forcible taking of their property. The most popularly cited example is the French revolution, but there are many other cases. Even where the rebellion doesn’t succeed the damage to the society may be severe and long lasting. – http://robertdfeinman.com/society/wealth_distribution.html

Well, perhaps there is another cheaper way to maintain peace. Get them high. Not everyone wants to stay in the gene pool. Any doctors of abortion clinics can testify that.

Give them easy way out. Not everybody has to raise a family. Make sure that their last moment in the gene pool is a happy one.

Main purpose of government is to maintain peace. It’s not an easy task with different people actually want to kill each other over mere arguments.

Anything that works will be great.

Ganja will be cheap enough once it’s legal. Due to positive externalities it gives, it deserves subsidy.

Other Sugestions?

I can think of a few:

  1. Draft all able bodied women to create more (Steve) Jobs.
  2. Humanitarian state subsidy for beautiful girls that do not have clothes to wear on public places. Looks like somebody slips through the crack of our $20 minimum wage laws. Well, let’s help those. Anyone beautiful and naked must be so poor and oppressed they can’t afford clothes and hence deserve compensatory subsidy. Tourists will come to witness our generosity increasing revenue for other local businesses. Shoes don’t count as clothes if it’s high heels.
  3. Prevent apocalypse by keeping jews happy. Give “chosen people” status to jews to slow down their outflow to Israel. The market chose them anyway. They can keep their status as long as they keep maintaining their usual supply of Nobel Prize winners and box office hits. Otherwise, maybe this whole apocalypse thingy is just a hoax, and so is the chosen stuff. But just in case.

We’re open to suggestions. We need to make our world a better place here.

March 7, 2012

February 21, 2012

Truth vs Beliefs

It’s easy for most of us to believe that truth is all that matters. It doesn’t matter what some crazy nuts believe. All that matter is truth.

Imagine if you’re a defendant in court. Which one matters more? The truth whether you indeed rape or murder the girl, or whatever the judge and jury believe?

Which one will land you in jail?

Now look at how politics work.

There is nothing in anti-drug laws that specify that prohibited drugs must be dangerous. There is nothing in anti-prostitution laws that specify that prostitution must be promiscuous or forced. Anti-women trafficking laws specifically add clauses that trafficking is still prohibited irrelevant of consent.

Yet most people believe that all prohibited drugs are more dangerous than the legal ones. People also believe that all prostitution and women trafficking are not consensual and hence less preferable than the legal marriage. Quite often their beliefs are what matters.

To further add complication, beliefs are often very useful for those who are in power. Those who are in power then have strong incentive to promote the beliefs irrelevant of truth. Take a look the belief that all humans are equal and have right to live for example. There is no proof for that. Yet, most of us, including me, would want to embrace that for obvious reason. We don’t want to die. Also if we end up killing each other we are all worst off.

This is too complicated. Few if any individuals in ancient time see that we will kill each other unless we recognize right not to be killed. Till today, most people don’t know. Most people are not aware that most people live, simply because it’s illegal to kill them.

Even if most of us do not want to kill for money, once we see too many people do it and get away with it, we too will do it. The main reason why we don’t kill is simply because we believe that killing doesn’t pay.

In ancient time, religions give reason to promote beliefs that simply don’t have proof but beneficial to many anyway.

Many things are not that benign.

We sort of think that most interaction are consensual. We sort of see that prohibition against consensual acts are the exception rather than the norm. Few of us see that’s it’s simply the interest of those who are in power, rather than the interest of the consenting parties, that are behind laws against consensual acts.

Put your self in the shoes of judges. Which way the judges care more? Truth or bribe? It’s easy for us to blame judges. But aren’t we like that? When we vote, do we care about justice or interests? Very often it’s simply our interests too, which we pretend to be justice.

It’s simply not to the best interest of religious leaders to let their followers to interpret their religions freely or change religion.

The same way it’s not to the best interests of those with less to offer to simply legalize all consensual transactions. Doing so would force them to compete viciously against those with far better offers than them. That often lead to extinction.

We don’t expect most voters to want free trades, which mean they are losing their job. We don’t expect poorer males would want sugar babies legalized, which mean the rich will just get all the girls. The same way we don’t expect ugly feminists to support legalization porn, in which prettier girls get all the attention. We also won’t expect the poor not to support nationalized health care or lower tax. It simply isn’t going to happen.

One solution is to embrace freedom all the way and fight for our freedom, or look at reality and adapt to it. That’s what tyrants and grafters do. They lied, they cheat, they enslave, but what’s the alternative? The alternative is to be lied to, to be cheated to, and to be non-consensually enslaved by the will of the ignorant majority.

To further add to the complexity, beliefs do change reality to the same, if not more degree, than the other way around. If people believe something, they bet on it, they count on it, then they want it, and they make that happens.

We believe that drugs are dangerous, so it becomes really dangerous with mafias, gangs, and cops shooting each other over it. Countries that legalize drugs will be vilified for the obvious reason. They show that drug is not dangerous and that means offending the beliefs of many with interests invested on drugs prohibition.

Many believe that God exist and is on their side, and the world behave as if God is really on the emperor’s side with everyone fears rebelling against emperors. We believe that prostitution can’t be consensual and what do you think a pimp will do if he knows that the punishment for him will be the same anyway whether the girls consent or not?

Because our beliefs, though false, are even useful to us, and because beliefs are self-fulfilling, we tend to maintain our beliefs irrelevant of anything.

Now, I wonder if I can learn more about it? NLP?

Incoming search terms:

  • www free market for ever com

November 18, 2011

Perhaps atheists are the only one truly save from comitting idolatry

Perhaps we are all idolatrous. Nowadays, people worship images of God in their mind.

In ancient time, idolaters are people that make images of God or gods. Just like ancient people craft statues and call it God. Now, our religious leaders craft images of God in our mind and tell us that’s the true God.

I know those are just images because different people have different images.

In Christianity, God is a triumvirate. In Judaism, God is one. In Hinduism, God has many theories.

For socialists, God is a socialist demanding huge redistribution of wealth. For capitalists, God is a capitalist giving more to those who have more ensuring that the greatest among us are those providing the best service to the most customers.

They can’t all be right. At most, only one of the image is correct. Even then, it’ll still be an image.

Even if those are snapshots of the true God (or gods), it’s still just snapshots. Not to mention corrupt snapshots given that everyone has intensive to make that snapshots fit their interests.

Perhaps the savest way to ensure we’re not committing idolatry is to become an atheist. Or perhaps, being agnosis is the right way to go, believing in God without images or knowledge whatsoever.

October 13, 2011

Does God condone rape?

Young’s Literal Translation
‘When a man findeth a damsel, a virgin who is not betrothed, and hath caught her, and lain with her, and they have been found,

http://bible.cc/deuteronomy/22-28.htm

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace.  If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor.  But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town.  When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town.  But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder.  You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.

http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm

My background is agnosticsm, christianity, and libertarian. So consider this a lense rather than the facto answer.

Here is my libertarian side speaking:
1. In NO culture, women own themselves. In US, for example, women cannot be a prostitute. That means the state, rather than the women, has power to decide what women can do. In a sense, effectively, the state, own the women. Told you I am a libertarian.
2. If women fully own themselves, they will all choose brad pit :)
3. In ancient time Israel does have debtor jail. It’s called slavery. Those who rape and can’t pay will be slave. What else do we expect?
4. In polygamistic society, women bride price are very expensive. Only the rich can get married and women prefer the rich anyway. I bet daddy took into account how hot daughtie is in measuring the bride price.

Now my atheist part is speaking
1. I don’t know whether God prohibit porn or homosexuality or not. Yahweh, the jewish God, is very different than God christians believe. Actually God christians believe is closer to Plato’s God or even Chinese’ Shang Ti. I do not know how much God wrote the bible.
2. People are homophobic and interpret scripture to fit their agenda. Those who are different than us vote for different party in election. That sucks for them. So they want that prohibited.
3. People interpret religions in ways that are politically correct. So I would expect christians will simply try to rationalize this forced to marry women. So most christians will say it’s not really happen, or it doesn’t applicable anymore. It’s called politically correct filter. They don’t teach this in sunday schools.
4. Morality is just the will of those who are in power. If your daughter got rape that means you’re weak anyway and you sort of “deserve” it. Learn kung fu next time. That’s the essence of all ancient religions. Really. All the killing of those who are different or believe differently are simply the killing of those who are weak and lootable. This explain away all genocide in the name of religion from Israelites genocide against the Canaites and German genocide against jews.
5. To be fair toward religion, without religion people would kill each other too. The athenes also kill and loot those they defeated in war. So, it’s really impractical to expect a culture to behave differently than the rest among wolves. Such culture will just go extinct.

Now my christian part want to say something:

Well, nothing. I don’t know. What to say.

Perhaps, God just want to be reasonable. In which case there is no way to know whether something is from God or from beer drinking corrupt political leaders. I wish I can know.

August 31, 2011

Why we let the rich get richer?

I think you should read all the other answers first. Like Eric. This is for the cynical:

It’s the cynical answer. I know. The more ethical answer is because it’s “fair”. However, for how “fairness” somehow becomes reality requires a little “process”. Fairness, is not just moral. It’s practical, and profitable. It took times for us to realize it, but we finally did.

The basic idea of is that under capitalism, people get rich through productivity. So it doesn’t matter how they get rich, they are benefiting everyone else.

The problem with that idea is, while seems fair and noble, is not actually how things work.

In ancient time, emperors are rich and unproductive and the people “let them” even more than people let the rich get rich now.

Why?

Emperors are strong. Some people know enough politics and enough business skills to lead. If some peasants would protest, emperors would kill them along with their families.

People are selfish. They do not max out their profit based on their income like in sunday school economy class. People maximize their profit based on their power.

Here is an easy way to see this. Deep inside, all species, including humans, just want to pass on their genes to the next. If we want to see how much power some men have, just look at the number of wives they have. Emperors have a lot. Capitalists do not. Capitalists, while rich, are not powerful, and hence don’t get “what they want” as much as emperors.

So issue is not merit. The issue is power. However, merit and power has a positive causality. To get power, you need people to agree. For people to agree you need to benefit them. That’s in a sense merit.

If we really do not like disparity of success, shouldn’t we complaint about disparity of power instead?

In fact, how power often override productively earned wealth is the very reason why people complain why the rich get richer. Complaining against the rich pays because the rich are weak and who knows we can rob them. Complaining against the powerful doesn’t.

So the question then become obvious. If the rich are weak anyway, why the mass, which are stronger, let them be rich? That seems to be the heart of the question. Forget about right and wrong. It’s not real. We’re selfish. Why do the mass let the rich be rich? Why not tax the rich to death and grab the money?

Actually they did. Ask jews, armenian, borgueis in China and tax payers in US.

But then the world stop doing that.

Let’s examine first how the world become the way it is.

300 years ago, a wise sage, Adam Smith, wrote wealth of nations. Now the best and brightest among us have choice. They can still make money productively or they can be dictators. Before the latter is the only choice. Before the only way to get truly rich is to be king. As the former start becoming lucrative, that’s what many smart people do.

Things don’t go as well as planned. Money is not equal with power. Well money is a form of power. There are far greater power than money. Namely political power.

Armenians and jews learn this the hard way. They earned money productively, cause resentment, and get killed.

However, the word seems to have a karma like behavior (though i still don’t think it’s as perfect as Buddha think it is).

Imagine the world where the productive get slaughtered. Would you bother being productive? Any society that fail to embrace free market are riddled with corruption, and political strife. Everyone is worst off.

We’re not dumb. We always come up with ways to move our self to equilibrium that’s “better”. What works in some is then tried in others. Through experience free market tend to produce good results. So the rest of the world follow and do it.

So the question of why we allow the rich to get richer is because it is toward our best interest to do so. Should we not, the best and brightest among us will become corrupt and dictators we will all pay the price.

Some may think that we shouldn’t because disparity of wealth is “bad”. Well, just look at emperors. Just look at disparity of wealth and power in socialist countries. Disparities always exist. Do we want that to happen because somebody is more productive or do we want that to happen because somebody has more gun?

Here is another way to look at it.

The smart can:
1. Be dictators
2. Be corrupt
3. Be productive

The mass can:
1. Support free market
2. Support socialism

For thousands of years we’re on 1,2 strategy. It’s natural then that we evolve into 3,2. It’s more lucrative.

Before, even though I am rich productively, I will still be affraid of being sent to some concentration camp by the powerful. Knowing that I try to be powerful, which is not very productive. It’s to the best interest of society then to guarantee my right to live and spend money as I please. As that get taken care of, I start becoming productive.

You see how the process works? You see how both businessmen and the mob benefited?

Now recently something even more interesting happen. It’s called globalization.

The best and brightest among us has the 4th option. They can live. They can move their factories to China to avoid minimum wage oppression, for example.

This put countries to be more like business. Each countries can only charge so much out of their productive members. Too much, and like customers they shop around.

Imagine the world before globalization.

I produced a light bulb. Someone else make better light bulbs. So I pay thugs to kill him. Now I sell more light bulbs. I generated more revenue and profit. If the extra money is bigger than the thugs’ cost, of course I do that.

In fact, that’s what happened in third world countries for years. Rather than spending resources productively, they spend resources bribing politicians to give them favors and quite often literally send thugs. Disparity of wealth happen anyway. Politicians get richer and richer.

It’s only natural. In a sense, it’s not too unfair. If the people are ignorance and resort to force, it’s natural that someone that’s not ignorance, namely the corrupt politicians, collect the money instead.

Political influence on biz created some form of niche that politicians simply fill, like businessmen.

Now under globalization, if I send thugs to beat up competing stores, I will still have to compete with chinese. No win solution. It doesn’t pay to pay thugs anymore.

Now those who used to be thugs and corrupt politicians obviously do not like globalization. That’s why they keep fighting for a while, become terrorists or something. But again, karma will work again. People are fed up with them. They’re getting killed. And good system, like free trades flourish again.

So the answer of why we let the rich, rich, is because they/someone else will be rich anyway even if we don’t let them. It’s just that they’ll be rich through ways not favorable to us.

Hei what about another option. I can lie. I can trick people that the government is fair and then screw the productive. Or I can trick the people that free market doesn’t work. Again, this gets difficult due to proliferation of internet. Truth prefails over falsehood thanks to abundant information.

Now, perhaps, just perhaps. The people still want to be a socialist. Well some socialism could work. Libertarian would argue it’s wrong, but I am a cynic. I care only about profits, not right and wrong.

As we see in Denmark it sort of work. However, that’s because people in Denmark is smarter. It takes skill to rob from the rich and give to ones’ self. Also it can only go so far because if they charge too much, the productive can always go somewhere else.

Most countries are not that smart. They do not know political science. Hell, they believe in religions. They do not understand that humans maximize profit. They think people are moral. They do not see that humans’ interests create morality. They think it’s God.

If I were a businessmen in that country, I would just bribe the religious leaders. Why bother being nice to the people if the people will blindly obey whatever nonsense the religious leaders spit out rather than seeing by themselves what’s good for them and whether they’re getting what they want.

This is of course what religious leaders want. That’s why, in countries like Indonesia we have pogroms against those who think differently. That’s why we have censorship that keep people in the dark. And that’s why Indonesians are not as rich as the rest of the world.

In a sense, that’s like karma too. The more ignorant the people, the poorer they will be. The more they tolerate or accept terrorism, the more terrorists will there be, raising biz costs.

After evolution and experience, the most lucrative system even for the poor is capitalism. Due to information age, everybody knows that. That’s why capitalism prefail everywhere. That’s why we let the rich getting richer. Because it’s most profitable for us, and because now we know it. Because human race has tried everything else and doesn’t perform as well as this.

Incoming search terms:

  • asian harem
  • real harem
  • are jews getting richer
  • Being rich in your relationship with God is a richer way to live - forever
  • globalisation allows the rich to become richer

May 23, 2011

Are Anti Porn Legislations Genocide Against the Pretty?

In ancient time, Nazi wanted to maintain a prejudice that Jews were not nationalist. The problem was that there were more german born Jews that died for germany, as proportion to their population, than even regular german on world war 1.

So, the Nazi simply buried that data from the public.

Now feminazis wanted to maintain a prejudice that love is blind. “Beauty is skin deep”, says those who do not understand evolutionary psychology. The problem was that there were more men attracted to beautiful girls than even normal girls. Those males are genetically hard wired to want genetically hard wired beautiful mates.

Obviously, money, friends, status, and everything will flock to those who are more attractive and can give more value to customers. Beautiful girls are not witches. They don’t sell their country to attract mates. They don’t trick people. They’re not evil. They’re just superior. So men flock them.

So feminazis burry the evidence of how attractive beautiful girls are. Some countries even force women to wear burqha rather than showing it all off.

Some european countries now prohibit thin women from becoming models. Is this a beginning of a world wide pogroms against those who simply are more competitive?

By the way, the rich also pay more tax per capita than the rest of the population. Still people believe that the rich are not nationalist. I guess bigotry never ends do they?

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by phpBB german models

May 16, 2011

Will Mutual Understanding Lead to Mutual Profit?

In ancient time the idea that humans are selfish are also shocking. Properly understood we have capitalism and prosperity. Perhaps showing that humans are not only selfish and greedy, but also bigotic and hypocritical will help us to come up with capitalism ++ that leads to even more prosperity. I mean more understanding usually leads to better outcome.

February 23, 2011

Why People Want Religion

In ancient time, brahmana and ksatriya are the highest caste. However, they’re not very productive. Brahmana are simply religious leaders. Ksatriya are simply murderer.

The way is the same with everyone else. In Europe, knight and monks are highly respected. Rashidun Chalipate’s main income comes from looting neighboring countries. It lasts only 30 years before being replaced by a tyrant that slaughter Muhammad’s descendants. In ancient time, most countries, including muslim countries, are simply aggressive nations earning money through military campaign.

Yes they can be productive if they kill bad guys, but what happen when there are no bad guy left? What happen when the majority of the world are more interested in reaching prosperity rather than killing each other?

Those 2 will be useless.

Now, the greatest among us are those providing the best service to the most customer. Even porn stars and prostitutes are more respected than thugs or religious leaders.

So is it strange that religious leaders, and thugs, want to go back to the system that worked thousands of years ago?

Obviously they wouldn’t tell the people that they do it because they want to fill their coffer. That’s not sexy. If humans’ interests are the motives, religion is the ads. We don’t expect cigarette ads come and show, “Marlboro, contains only 5% nicotine, very addictive.” Eliminating religion is like insisting that all ads will be like that. Obviously it wouldn’t work.

And what about the people? Why would they select that kind of leaders?

Let’s face it. Most humans are not sexy. Recently, google build driverless cars. Under free fair competition, most people are just obsolete. No, I am not saying that crossbows are obsolete. I am saying that those who can only use crossbows are obsolete. Most people cannot compete with what the best and brightest can offer under free market. That’s just fact.

Say you oppose free sex. Say you said to the world, guys, we should prohibit free sex. If people are free to choose, and if all choices are seen, they won’t choose us. That’s not sexy isn’t it?

Of course they used religion. Alternatively they can say that porn cause rape, and we can see that it’s not true. Alternatively they can argue so much about how sex outside marriage demean women, but then we would recognize that as vague.

It only takes one country to try liberating their market, along with commercialized sex, and all sexiest most productive people will go there.

Their best strategy, from their point of view, is simply religion. For many reasons, people hate freedom. When all of us are free to choose, we don’t choose them.

Even when religions are gone, many would still opposes free sex. However, they can no longer come up with unverifiable excuses like that.

In fact, I seriously doubt atheism will bring peace. I saw that humans’ nature has very strong zero sum game component. It’s as if we are genetically predestined to trick and kill each other. Religions are not anomaly. It’s just the norm as we have seen from the last thousands of years.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Loading...