Free Market Forever

Free Market Invest in Girls Rich Smart Girls Beauties Beautiful Babes Beautiful Girls Girls in Stocks Bare Girls Forex Invest

Discover guaranteed proven new safe way you'll love and save money. Why rich smart attractive males avoid marriage? Why religions teach you to get married? Why feminazis prevent consenting females from accepting high paying jobs and escaping patriarchal oppression? Why force and deceit are often more politically correct than consent in getting a mate? What should you do to help your self?

What most males want are of course, protecting women from more attractive choices.

But to mate and breed with good genes.

I would live in a penthouse that also works as my office. Every day, I’ll oversee an army of pretty smart female employees working in lingerie uniform. Then I would bang them one by one, or three at a time, to ensure loyalty to “the Company”.

I would make millions and millions of dollars while my employees manage my existing biz. I’ll keep creating newer and newer ones. I will sell those biz in stock market and make more millions.

Then I would make many kids. My lawyers will convince a judge that I am legally penniless and hence all 1000 children I beget will be on welfare check. Not that I can’t afford those kids but there is no way I am going to be a sucker and give money away to those who aim to oppress my freedom. Fuck that socialist bigot.

Then I would advertise in newspaper on how successful I am, both in biz and in gene pool. Then I would advertise my genes through online marketing so Octomom would want to have my kid too. She’s not that selective isn’t she?

Then I’ll make 10k kids per year.

Then everyone will share my genes.

Now that what I want to happen in my life.

I remember a story when a communist leader brought her Mom to his place. She ate expensive caviar, driven in Limo, stay in expensive hotel with gold plated bath. She told her son, “Good for you, but what about if the commies win.”

I chuckle. That sucker commies. They don’t know that some people will be successful anyway. It’s just that not all people can be rich honestly. When winning (=rich) is illegal (in communist countries) then the winners are cheaters.

Latter, I learn that the purpose of life, according to science is to reproduce. I would like to honor my great great great …. 100000000…..th ancestor, a 1 cell organism, that, without failing, have managed to produce lots of unbroken chain of successful reproduction, ended up in me.

My plan was:
1. Make a lot of money. Capitalism allow all of us to achieve this.
2. Attract and sleep with many pretty women. If I have 1 billion dollars and prostitution were legal, this is obviously not a problem. Even if prostitution were illegal, it’s not as tough as you see because women like bling bling which 1 billion dollar can afford.
3. Make many kids.
4. Support those kids through college, give them $1 million to start over.

Obviously all these are consensual and hence victimless. Well, in a sense, at least. If all billionaires are like that, then many males won’t get laid ever but we don’t count uncompetitive people as victims do we?

Wallmart control the whole market share in discount store and drive everyone else away is OKAY under free market. The same way so what if rich males giving more attractive offer to millions of women and drive the rest extinct? That’s just how free fair competition work.

I soon see problems with this plan.

1. I can’t just pay women for sex. There are only 2 ways to lawfully get laid. Free sex when women do it for free. And then marriage where I might lost half of my earning and future earning to someone I mutually hate. Also marriage must be monogamous. That sucks.
2. Make many kids? Hmm… Some nobel prize winner managed to do it by donating sperms. Maybe I’ll try that.
3. Supporting those kids. Well this comes the problem. I’ve heard that the law on child support is that the amount must be proportional to your income. So no matter how rich we are, we cannot afford 1000 kids. Also court says that you cannot make an agreement with women that your child support should not be, say, more than $10k per year, for example. The judge says that the right of the non existent child must be protected (court case?). Wow… So much for pro choice abortion right I guess.

Just like in communist countries, a bunch of prejudice are placed to justify laws against “success”. In communist countries we are falsely told that those who make money are stealing and hurting the economy. Now, religious bigot tell that prostitution, porn, and sex outside marriage are hurting women (despite consensual).

Now I see why wealth, mere wealth, don’t bring much happiness.

Are we like the commies? Is getting successful in gene pool is only reserved for those who cheat?

Richard Dawkins, an atheist, in http://www.secularhumanism.org wonder why people are religious.

He made many arguments. To explain why people are religious, we would expect that religions would serve ones’ gene pool survival.

It doesn’t seem to be that way. Religions, for example, teach us how to

…devours huge resources. A medieval cathedral consumed hundreds of man-centuries in its building. Sacred music and devotional paintings largely monopolized medieval and Renaissance talent. Thousands, perhaps millions, of people have died, often accepting torture first, for loyalty to one religion against a scarcely distinguishable alternative. Devout people have died for their gods, killed for them, fasted for them, endured whipping, undertaken a lifetime of celibacy, and sworn themselves to asocial silence for the sake of religion….”

Dawkins argues that religions may work as placebo (meagerly). Perhaps, religions promote group selection theory (which is partially true).

Perhaps, religions are just stupid remnants that we still have that used to work. That is true, but only in countries in England, where Dawkins live, as I shall show.

But all his arguments only meagerly touch the surface why people are religious.

You see, one very effective ways to win in a competition is to screw better competitors. In this case, all the stupidity of religions make perfect sense because it is enforced on others!

In many other countries, religious bigots can force their moral ideas to others. Hence, the stupidity of religions will be suffered by others. That will make it easy for the religious to win.

For example, say I am a King, Sultan, or Emperor that wants to have many women. It is toward my best interest to promote and even enforce celibacy for the rest. I would want all the other males to be as asexual as possible. That way, I will get as many women as possible.

Hence, such kings will prohibits all information that may motivate males to seek women, such as porn. A Sultan would rather his subjects to commit jihad, crusade, or whatever to against another countries or minorities rather than wooing women. That way more males will die and there will be more women for the king.

A political leader can also more easily find justification for war with religions. Rather than waiting for the enemies to be a real threat or a real assholes, which often mean that the enemies are tough, a king, or sultan can simply argue that a minority is evil. What evil? Well, anything. You see, the other side believe that "God like chocolate, which is of course, a heresy because God actually prefer cheese." This must be true as said in some ancient books written by someone supposedly important some thousands of years ago. That books must be credible due to angelic, apostolicity, or whateverolistic succession based on some divine doctrines.

Things sound good. All the other males are death and the harem is full. Oh wait a minute, there is a problem. Our males are reading playboy. They don’t want to die in holy war. They want to enjoy a good life and pursue happy dreams.

What would you do if you were the Sultan? When things don’t go our way, we call it immoral. The Sultan will simply issue a religious edict that playboy is immoral and hence should not be read.

What about the women? Well, many males can often provide good options for women. Some males may offer women with high salary as porn star. Another men may just want to have fun with women outside marriage. Under free market mechanism, many people are rich without having to be politically powerful. That men may want women to be their casual mating partners.

What’s best for a woman is, of course, what the woman choose.

But if woman chooses other males’ offer, then she is less likely to choose religious bigots’ offer, such as marriage, often toward poverty.

Hence, it’s pretty natural then that many religious bigots want to criminalize, porn, striptease, and sex outside marriage.

Incoming search terms:

• powered by phpBB religion information

Option 1. Listen attentively.

Well, that sucks. They’re losers. Whatever they tell you may not be accurate. They’ll lead you to the wrong direction. Also it shows them that yelling and cursing you is a way to get your attention. That means you can expect more.

Option 2. Ignore

That’s tough too. You see, losers demand more attention from others. While winners don’t care if people don’t care about them, losers do. Others’ attention is their ways to assert their self esteem. Expect more cursing if you ignore them.

Option 3. Escape

Whether it’s your family, your wife, your kids or anyone. The best way to deal with losers is to stay away from them as much as possible. Due to various laws and norms promoted by, well, losers, getting rid a spouse may be an expensive endeavors requiring expensive lawyers. It’s worthed.

Option 4. Exterminate

While you have nothing to do with losers doesn’t mean they don’t want to have anything to do with you. The world is full with losers turn bigots opposing free fair competition. They promote various punishments against the productive and successful. There are tons of punishments in store for those who successfully make lots of money or successfully attract many mating partners. Losers gene pool survival depend on screwing those more competitive than them. Unless you fight back.

Individual freedoms correlate positively with efficient allocation of resources.

Countries that respect individual freedom are rich and that must because people in those countries realized, often correctly, that their interest match their productivity.

So we wouldn’t make much mistake if we “define” individual freedom by lack of market distortion governments’ create. That’s what we’ll do in this article.

Say government says that you cannot buy orange. Than governments trample on your individual freedom, namely your right to buy orange.

But it depends on the punishment. We can’t say the government violates our individual freedom if the punishment is too light.

Say the government says that if you buy orange you need to be fined by $1. Then well, that’s your oppression. $1. Big deal.

Say the market price for apple is $5 and government says that it should be $6. So every time you buy an apple you are fined $1. Tax and fine is the same thing.

That also means that orange suppliers get a subsidy of $1.

Also by being a consumer of orange rather than the supplier, you forgo the $1 subsidy that the orange supplier makes. So that’s another $1 punishment for you for every orange you fail to make. Government has forced everyone to produce orange by not giving them $1 that government gives to orange producer.

The same way free health care is punishment against those who are healthy. Free education is punishment for those who do not have kids. If paid by income tax, that means punishment for those who earn money.

Typical of the comments uttered by Hazony’s demagogic idol: “I want the Israeli Arabs out of here because I don’t want to kill them every week, as they multiply and demonstrate”; “They are germs that are poisoning us. They will not leave us be until they have raped all our women and murdered all our men”; and “I recognize the submachine gun’s right to speak and the knife’s right to speak.”

http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/bamford.html

Of course, the other side says something similar.

The short answer is I don’t know. Correlation between rape and porn is slight … and negative, suggesting otherwise. But slight either way.

Can it? Is it important? Does it matter? Is it what’s really going on? In what sense?

Well, think about it. Males’ main motivation to prevent rape is not really to protect women’s freedom. Their main motivation is to prevent women from falling to other males.

So if porn, for example, do not motivate males to rape women but motivate them to make a lot of money and actively pursue girls, will that satisfy anti porn males. No. They will still call it something negative like rape. When Japanese men hire Chinese prostitute in orgy, poorer Chinese simply declare that it’s “rape” even though the prostitute are paid. The Chinese government put the prostitute in jail. We can check here for more info.

Now, in Arab countries, porn causing rape is used as justification to prohibit porn rather than punishing rapists. It’s not hard to understand. People rape for 2 main reasons. They’re not sexually competitive and they’re militant. That kind of demographic is what controls Arab’s politic. In other word, any politician that want to go up must please that demographic.

Okay, is Arab evil?

Well, evil is relative. Relative to what? In no country in the world I see women are completely and sexually free. If they were free, only alpha males get laid and no countries have the majority of the males’ population take it as a man. The closest I know of is in England, where 50% of the guys don’t have girlfriend.

Even then, I bet in British child support laws are designed to be proportional to a man’s financial capability and hence forcing women to “sale” their reproductive service at higher price to richest males. That’s probably not the kind of pricing schemes most women prefer.