Free Market Forever

Free Market Invest in Girls Rich Smart Girls Beauties Beautiful Babes Beautiful Girls Girls in Stocks Bare Girls Forex Invest

Discover guaranteed proven new safe way you'll love and save money. Why rich smart attractive males avoid marriage? Why religions teach you to get married? Why feminazis prevent consenting females from accepting high paying jobs and escaping patriarchal oppression? Why force and deceit are often more politically correct than consent in getting a mate? What should you do to help your self?

Say the cost of producing a corn is $5 per unit.

Say the market price for corn is $10 per unit.

That means we need more corn producers.

What about if the market price for corn is only $3?

That means we need subsidy. Or do we?

Perhaps those simply mean that we have too much corn.

Productivity as a whole will increase if less people produce corn.

And the beauty of it is that the market will take care of it.

Can we apply the same principles for corn to humans being?

We do!

In fact, just like the market sort of take care of it in corn; the market will sort of take care of it in humans’ reproduction.

Making a kid is like starting a business. Each kid is then a business. The worth of a business, and hence, the kid, is then the interest discounted present value of the expected difference between the kids’ productivity and their maintenance costs.

Say the present value of the cost of raising a brick layers is $500,000.00. Say the present value of expected productivity a brick layer will get is $200,000.00.

That means we need more subsidy. Or do we?

Perhaps those simply mean that we have too many blue collar workers.

Productivity as a whole will increase if we produce more movie star, entrepreneurs, and dentists than if we produce more blue collar workers.

And the beauty of it is the market will take care of it.

You see, women prefer the rich.

Those who are genetically predestined to pick occupation with high demand and low supply will get richer.

Their kind will attract more women and produce more kids. Voila… Without governments intervention in reproduction we already improve productivity as a whole.

What about if we do not pick our occupation based on our genetic material? What about if we pick our occupation based on free will?

No different. Males prefer as many pretty women as possible. When genetic quality doesn’t matter, the market mechanism will still motivate males to pick occupation yielding the most income.

We will increase the number of those in higher paid occupation, not by reproduction, but by motivation.

What about the losers?

What losers? There are no losers. Everyone is better off under free market.

Losing used to mean getting slaughtered for males and getting raped for females.

Nowadays, those things don’t happen anymore.

There are no losers. Just those who are less successful than other. But there is always disparity of success no matter what the system is.

All right, we can tax kids and pay dividend to all citizens to buy votes from the losers; I mean those who are not as successful as us yet.

Poor people prefer more cash than making more kids anyway. Meanwhile, they can always choose porn and prostitution till they’re rich enough to attract a wife.

Sentence 1: Men naturally want as many females as possible.
Sentence 2: Women want the best genes.

These 2 sentences can be very politically incorrect.

Especially sentence 2. Women want the best genes, imply that there are such things as best genes.

What are the best genes?

Whichever customers prefer. (more…)

Incoming search terms:

• antithetical sentence powered by phpbb
• politically incorrect sentences
• most politically incorrect sentance
• politically incorrect sentence

Most people lie because they believe that lying will give them what they want. Sometimes, what they want is what you want too, in which case you’ll call it white lie, or good lie.

Sometimes, what they want is the opposite of what we want. So we call it a foul lie. In any case, it’s still a lie.

What’s often happen, is it’s important to see the lie as a lie even though is “good.”

Many of the conclusions evolution theories will tell us are facts of life the dictators and politicians have known for thousands of years.

However, those are aspects they try to hide. Moreover, for thousands of years, those facts are known only as facts. Few know how to link all those facts with few principles.

For most of the time, only a few know those facts. Most people believe the opposite. The more something is true, the more people try to convince you for the opposite.

For example. Here are two facts people have been using for a long time.

1. Human males want as many pretty females as possible.
2. Human females, women, want the best genes, usually signaled by wealth.

There are two corollaries of those two facts.

1. One is that we can hold this truth with plenty of evidence that humans are not equal. There are such things as better genes and best genes. Disparity of genes quality is a fact and they matters, because women want that and men want women.
2. Second, we just see an inherent basic difference between males and females.

Those two corollaries are probably the most politically incorrect ideas nowadays don’t them?

Hence, those facts are hidden to prevent racism, slavery, and sexism. Those facts are often used as justification for various now politically incorrect institutions. Still the facts are facts.

There are more, arguably better, rational reasons to oppose racism, slavery, and sexism.

For example, racism and slavery will set a precedent where the greatest among us are those who can convince that the others are sub humans and kill the others.

Under capitalism, the greatest among us are those who provide better services to more customers.

Quite obviously, capitalism leads to prosperity, while racism and slavery will lead to more war as all sides have intensives to slaughter the others.

But those are reasoning people do not emotionally connect with.

So a politician, with intentions you may consider to be good, then simply lies or deceive the people with abstract concepts such as humans’ equality.

Of course, incorrect theories, while correct in some places will cause some problems in others.

It’s not true that we only get money by being productive. The fact of life is, humans also rob each other.

There isn’t any way to completely get rid this aspect.

Think it this way, why the Chinese don’t nuke US? Why US don’t nuke China?

Because we’re both are nice civilized guys that just don’t kill each other to solve our differences? Do we?

We’re good. We’re not that good. (more…)

When I was young I paid heavy tax.

Then I went to a supermarket.

A fat black lady, smiling at me, is buying food with food stamps.

“Argh,” I said to my self, “It’s my money. Hik hik… I am a slave to the majestic welfare kings and queens.”

I had wanted to click my shoes and salute my newly recognized master right in front of everyone.

I am tired of people claiming they are enslaved by capitalists. I’d like to who are the real bosses.

However, the smile is non hostile. This woman may need it to feed their kids, which she shouldn’t have made. I made a lot.

Somehow, I just don’t feel like making a big deal about it no matter how I rationalized it. My mind says “It’s wrong”, but my emotion says, “Let it go.”

At that time I didn’t realized that our emotion is genetically proven algorithm tested over trillions of years.

Kong Fu Chu said that if there is a logical way to get rich he wants to get rich. If there isn’t, he’ll just follow his feeling.

I was rational. I didn’t listen to my feeling.

At that time I admire the Republican Party a lot because they support lower tax.

At least someone is voicing freedom in a supposedly free country.

However, now I realized that there are aspects of life economy classes don’t cover.

You see… Good or bad is always relative and subjective.

Sure, welfare program is bad. However, it’s bad relative to what and for whom?

Obviously it’s good for the recipient. It’s bad for the productive. However, even though it’s bad for the productive, how bad is it relative to other schemes it may replace?

Governments conjure tariffs and trades. Governments subsidize farm products and obsolete industry. Governments kill foreigners for oil industry.

There are plenty of sex laws against consensual sex.

If paying welfare check can allow us to buy enough votes to replace those even greater dangers, is welfare still bad?

When I was young I paid heavy tax.

Then I went to a supermarket.

A fat black lady, smiling at me, is buying food with food stamps.

“Argh,” I said to my self, “It’s my money. Hik hik… I am a slave to the majestic welfare kings and queens.”

I had wanted to click my shoes and salute my newly recognized master right in front of everyone.

I am tired of people claiming they are enslaved by capitalists. I’d like to who are the real bosses.

However, the smile is non hostile. This woman may need it to feed their kids, which she shouldn’t have made. I made a lot. (more…)

A Lot of workers are demonstrating demanding the cancellation of a law draft regulating workers’ in Indonesia.

I am not going to argue against or in favor of the law. It’s just that I think the dispute is wrongly targeted. Those who fight in favor or against the law is penny wise point folly.

I need to point out to all parties of how to improve workers’ salary and income in Indonesia. (more…)

The answer is yes.

However, my idea of what’s not victimless will differ from most conservative.

You see, the only common case I can think of is if they produce kids they cannot or will not, or in anyway don’t, afford.

That creates two victims. The kids, and the tax payer.

And that’s not all.

(more…)

How do we distribute wealth among us?

Some people would say that we distribute our wealth proportional to productivity within capitalistic society.

I do not mean how we distribute our wealth within capitalistic society. I also do not mean how we “should” distribute our wealth. (more…)

Lot of workers is demonstrating demanding the cancellation of a law draft regulating workers’ in Indonesia.

I am not going to argue against or in favor of the law.

However, I need to point out to all parties of how to improve workers’ salary and income in Indonesia. (more…)