The Whole Point Of Getting Rich
Rich males want as many females as possible. That’s the whole point of getting rich. Women prefer the rich. Rich males can attract and afford more women. And that’s why many want so many laws against consensual sex. To exterminate the best and brightest, and hence, tougher competitors from the gene pool.
Polygamy allows those with under represented, hence rare and valuable, talent to survive better in the gene pool. Prostitution allow those who serve the market more to simply used the money they earn fairly to hire women to create more productive individuals.
Sex laws against consensual sex, like anti prostitution and anti polygamy is slow genocide against those who are able and willing to pay for reproduction. Those are the kind of people that won’t bother the rest of us with welfare.
Why do you think the Jews and Mormon are model minority? Where are the smart among everyone else? They’re gone, because smart monks can’t even get married.
When unproductive people want to breed 12 kids, it’s legal because it’s humans’ right. That right, of course, implies the right to force the rest of us to support their kids. Even the poor liberal often prefer to have higher standard of living than making more kids. That’s why they instinctively want drugs legalization, gay right, and “pro-choice.” We’re losing money without making them happy. It’s a highly inefficient appeasement.
Yet, when rich smart males want to beget as many kids as he can afford, then virtually all ways become immoral. The billionaires cannot just pay women for sex because of anti prostitution law. Anti polygamy laws means they cannot have more than one wife. Child support laws are set up proportional to a man’s wealth rather than the need of a child. If child support law is 20% of your income per kids, for example, then no matter how rich you are you can’t afford more than 5 kids.
All these are not very surprising, when we understand that deep inside, less capable individuals crave the extermination of those more capable than them. That’s why people like Hitler became so popular.
Contemporary definition of sin in any religion is no longer acts that hurt others. Nowadays, sins mean success. When men successfully, and honestly, make money and mate with many females, suddenly that’s sin. The same happen to men that show “unusual capability.”
That’s why the mob free Barabas and demand Jesus to be put to death. That’s why religious leaders preach forgiveness toward thieves, burglars, and murderers while demanding heavy punishment for men that successfully, honestly, and consensually make a lot of money and mate with many females.
Living as the best and brightest is best or bust. They often do things differently, which mean they can be very successful, or fail up miserably. Unless the successful among them do not make many kids, they won’t make enough kids to compensate for the failure among them. Soon, they’ll be gone. The horde of evil parasites will simply become more and more. With huge voting power, they’ll simply want more and more.
Rich males want as many females as possible.
What about rich males who’ve made a commitment to one female?
Why do you think the Jews and Mormon are model minority?
The Mormons, actually, only practiced a limited form of polygamy. The Book of Mormon itself condemns the practice of taking “many wives and concubines,” calling it “abominable,” because “I, the Lord, have seen the sorrow, and heard the mourning of the daughters of my people in the land of Jerusalem, yea, and in all the lands of my people, because of the wickedness and abominations of their husbands.”
It does say that “if I will, … raise up seed unto me, I will command my people;” but this was an entirely different practice. When the Mormons practiced polygamy, the males in general weren’t allowed to take multiple wives, but a few of them were commanded to do so, often in order to take care of widows. Furthermore, the children they had were raised in loving homes, not killed off or left to fend for themselves, as they might have were their parents promiscuous. The Mormons terminated the practice towards the end of the 19th century, when it was illegalized by the United States government.
All these are not very surprising, when we understand that deep inside, less capable individuals crave the extermination of those more capable than them. That’s why people like Hitler became so popular.
Some people want that. Others want what’s best for other people. People opposed the Nazi Party and helped Jews escape, even when doing so meant risking their lives. Thousands and thousands of soldiers gave their lives to stop Hitler.
Contemporary definition of sin in any religion is no longer acts that hurt others. Nowadays, sins mean success. When men successfully, and honestly, make money and mate with many females, suddenly that’s sin.
When a man gives his word that he will only mate with one female, and then mates with many, he is not being honest. And when a man who is unmarried mates with many females, he does not usually become a successful father.
I think you are confusing being financially successful with being promiscuous, and — while I can’t speak for all churches — you’re accusing them of condemning the one when they’re really condemning the other.
You got the point. Many people give up their lives. But not for the Jews. People gives up their life because hitler pretty much screw everyone and cause great precedents. The only people that protect Jews seem to be the Jews themselves. When they kick butt other butt kickers want them to be their allies and hence anti antisemitism is gone.
It’s an irony. But sometimes people will hate you no matter what you do. The way to lessen the hatred is to actually commit evil.
Sir, I wasn’t referring only to the solders. I was also referring to the people in Europe who helped hide the Jews from the Gestapo, people now called “Righteous Among the Nations” by the Jews.
However, in addition to ignoring those people, you dishonor the soldiers’ sacrifices by suggesting they did it for themselves. Many people, it’s true, fought only because they were ordered to, or because they had some kind of personal grudge against the Germans. But many others knew what they were fighting for, and were aware of the moral ramifications of the conflict.
It’s an irony. But sometimes people will hate you no matter what you do. The way to lessen the hatred is to actually commit evil.
Gandhi disagrees with you, sir. So does common sense — or is it merely an Absurd Notion?