is not that they try to get rid the inferior. The problem is they tried to do so through governments’ intervention, rather than market mechanism.

Just like we do not need government to decide what’s good or bad for us, the same way we do not need government to decide who are inferior. That’s something the market will take care of.

If government choose which one is “bad”, then quite often, the one exterminated will end up being the best. That’s because bigots are more politically active and they always want to get rid the most competitive out.

I look around on the wikipedia. I found out that the amount of land seized by some Arab countries from their Jewish citizens are 4 times the area of Israel.

I am no longer sympathetic to these Palestinian cause when I read that. For a country that’s attacked first in 1948 and actually won, Israel is already pretty moderate and reasonable. After all, the proposal of population exchange is economically fair.

Granted, you can’t force people out even though you’re willing to pay the fair market price. But if you do pay the fair market price and the price is fair, or perhaps 20% higher, so what?

For example, when one vermin stole my digital camera, I was angry. But if the vermin then repented and pay me the fair monetary value of goods lost, I would have forgiven the vermins. It doesn’t mean people have right to steal my digital camera even if they’re willing to pay.

However, I wouldn’t go the extra mile chasing small issues. Needless to say the vermin didn’t do that and millions of thieves conviction records are now all over the internet as my revenge to ensure that all those vermins have a hard time getting a job.

Not simply because someone own money they have right to smash your car. But having someone smash your car is a justification to demand monetary compensation, perhaps 2-3 times the value of the car, not justification to wage eternal war.

The russia, for example, raped german women and never return german lost teritories for free. The thing is every body knows that russia is an ass and we don’t bitch about it.

Jews are supposed to be the good guy, the only good guy, and the world bitch about every little thing they did even though the rest of the world are worst. Who among us get land without fighting?

So what the fuck all this middle east war is all about?

Just compensate all refugees from both sides fairly minus “administrative” fee, or whatever, move on, and pay any countries that want to accept any refugees.

I mean, it is not directly comparable I know, but would still be a reasonably “fair” solution. Lebanon for example, treat their Jews fairly and hence shouldn’t have to pay up. They could probably ask for some compensation for the last bombing.

So not a perfect solution, but would reduce it by much. Then little things can be worked out. Perhaps an NAP ensuring that Israel don’t keep getting land through military means no matter how many nukes they have, quite obviously.

Israel accept Jewish refugees for free. The only country in the world that I know of that accept so many refugees so willingly. That greatly solve world refugees problem. Now we just need to have the other side solve the other half of the problem.

I am sure there are plenty of countries that don’t mind accepting 5 million Palestinian refugees if the country got $300 billion. Everything would be very simple if money arrange everything.

By the way, how the hell Palestinian refugees are 5 million anyway, it started out at 800K? Why can’t the Jews outbreed the Palestinians. Ups, they didn’t have my e-book. I get it. But the palestinians didn’t have that either. Kudo for palestinians for being able to practice gene pool survival guide without bother reading it.

Just recently I heard that LGTB conference in Indonesia is canceled because a private party threaten to terrorize it and cops say they cannot guarantee safety. Things get really ugly because in Indonesia you are not allowed to own gun. Even though having conference is legal, it effectively is illegal because of this. So any religious bigots effectively make the rule of the land by objecting.

Somebody just have to kick those religious bigots ass.

Anyway, what would a libertarian solution for this sort of thing be?

Anti Semites often said that Jews caused liberalization, globalization, free market, separation of church and state, and individualism. Hell, I thought that way too.

I was disappointed after further research. Come the fuck on. The idea that the best governments don’t govern much has been around since Lao Tze 2500 years ago. Adam Smith is not Jews. Democracy, is invented by Greek. Americans are not founded by Jews. Separation of state and religion has been around since pax mongolica. All those things could have happened even without Jews..

Humans can achieve globalization, free market, and the rest even without Jews’ help. Well, how much slower I don’t know. Yap, we don’t need those Jews just to see that free market works and globalization rocks. We just need common sense and some calculus to show that the marginal rate of substitution for resources among individuals is properly aligned to social welfare in a relatively more free economy.

Then I’ve heard in some skin head forum on how Russian farmers got driven out of biz because they cannot compete with Jews.

I don’t know the detail. But again, we are giving Jews too much credit for driving out inefficiencies out of biz.

Anything that can’t compete is supposed to go extinct. That’s the way of the market. The market way is of course the way. If Jews don’t drive those incompetence and relatively inefficient biz out, the Chinks, German, Italian, British, American, Japs, Protestants, Henry Ford, and Bill Gates will.

The world belongs to the best. Those who are not the best are supposed to go out. If no fraud or force is involved, chance is, there isn’t even any victim.

If those who can’t compete don’t go extinct, we will still be plowing the field with our hand. It’s totally victimless and natural. Can’t give credit for Jews for something that’s already normal.

Jews political skill is also quite pathetic. Imagine, there are more Jews that died during word war 1 for German side than any other ethnic group. There are higher percentages of German Jews that die for German than German Germans. Why die for some guys that will kill you latter?

That is a most stupid miscalculation, the sort of what Yuan Chonghuan and Yu Fei made.

I’ve heard they control the media and owned banks. I used to believe that you know. I mean under capitalism, it’s natural and fair that those who are dilligent and smart ended up owning banks.

At that time, I tried hard to find some Jews to do biz with so I can get connected with someone that own banks.

One Israeli Jews told me that he had a big biz. Yet he had trouble buying 30 domains for autoblogs. I ended up giving him discount because I like his spirit.

Good spirit, yea. Anyone can have a good spirit. That’s the beauty of capitalism.

Own bank my ass! Looks like I just found a jew that doesn’t. Huahemm… Another boring over expectation.

Maybe we mean they own money in banks. Well, isn’t that what all middle class in all countries do? Most of which are definitely not Jews. Last time I check, German, Japan, US and even third world countries like China got plenty of foreign reserve. Everybody is profited under capitalism. People just keep bitching that some gets profited more than others.

That’s what happens in democracy controlled by swing voters. The middle class own everything. The businessmen are just more productive workers whose fruits of labor are taken again through tax to support swing voters’ regime.

C’mon. I’ve been in US. I’ve seen some Jews. They’re smart and diligent relative to other white people I saw. For that kind of trait, I wonder why they’re not rich enough. Hell, even I once earned more income than those hard working super smart Professors. At that time I wasn’t even working. But even then I just found other ways to make money and start over again.

These Jews are really under achievers.

No wonder. They wasted their talent in science rather than concentrating on making money like everyone should. They have the lowest billionaire to (science category) nobel prize winner ratio in the world.

A normal man would just raise the finger and tell the world to fuck off rather than keep trying to make the world a better place. Not like the world is thanking the productive enough anyway.

Despite their contribution to science, the world keeps bitching about they controlling a small piece of land with no oil.

They really must have invested in more PR. I mean, the Asyrian, Babylone, Greek, Rome, Fatimid, Otoman, British, France, also get that same piece of land through war. Until today people still speak of Genghish Khan in good terms even though he took way more land than Jews.

The rest of the Arab gets their land, filled with oil, from Ottoman. Yet they fight toe and nails for a piece of worthless land. Arab are semites too. Are all Semites crazy? Looks like Jews are the most reasonable among Semites, or among even the whole human.

Yea, the land price in Israel is high but that’s because of capitalism. By itself, it’s a cheap desert land. Some said that it’s fertile. Like any country get rich growing fruit nowadays anyway.

Did you see this map?

Doesn’t even make sense. Bad PR. Bad PR. Bad PR. Should has hired me at least. The cheapest PR ever. Only $125. Oh wait a minute, they don’t own banks. I ended up doing this for free.

Yea Jews kick some Arab out. Not like the Muslims and Arabs are that nice to Jews anyway. Just check here http://www.hsje.org/Jews%20Kicked%20out%20of%20Arab%20Lands%20Part%202.htm

There are more Jews that fled Arab land than Arabs fleeing Jewish land. How come they don’t bitch a lot about it? We can get lots of sympathy by bitching you know, even though falsely.

Oh ya, according to these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands the land seized by Arabs from Jewish people is 4 times the size of Israel. So why not give all refugees fair monetary competition and move the fuck on?

If only those Jews grow some spines and balls, they would have controlled 4 times their territory and it would have been fair.

No wonder jews would rather gather among themselves and form their own country on a little land they can get.

Not like there is any other way in ancient time to get land anyway besides war. How the hell the rest of our ancestors get land? Everyone else is doing the same thing and yet somehow it’s a big deal when Jews did it.

Like ancient Song that keeps winning war yet keep giving away territories, Israel heroes are back stabbed by too many of their own Qin Hui that that they ended up appeasing religious bigots. Those bigots repeatedly state, possibly honestly, that they want to drive Jews to extinction. History shows that many people are quite mean to Jews.

Now they bitches about Palestinians and Arabs making too many kids among them. Well, that’s the whole purpose of being a carbon based living organism. Breed breed breed. Hello?

Did they bother to honor their great great great great great great ancestors, a one cell organism that begets all of us?

If they don’t like having 30% Arab population, then start breeding. If they don’t like genocide, then start breeding to replace lost rank.

The world need more nobel winning scientists so the Chinese can pirate their softwares. Ups, that would be from the Indians. Never mind.

But seriously, rather than exterminating Jews, we really should breed them like rabbits. We could use more scientists for space travel or whatever.

Duh… If we breed a million jew for every single one that die due to suicide bombing, they’ll never have to worry about extinction and we’ll never have to spend a dime for scientific research.

Anyone rich productively and smart should make thousands of kids.

Of course, if rich smart people cannot breed thousands of kids fast enough, due to lack of porn to encourage them, and various sexual norms, like monogamy, now that’s far more evil than any genocides. That’s not Nazi’s fault. Jews, as well as many democracy culture, did it to themselves.

Quantity IS quality as Ray Croc once said. Darwin, Dawkins, and Matt Ridley would agree.

Why not employ women from neighboring countries to help improve production capacity? Monogamy. Yea right… That’s what happen if people keep shooting their own foot and blame everyone else.

The Chinese lost 24 millions in Japs’ concentration camp, we don’t make a big deal out of it. Why should we? The japs pay cash for that right.

In fact, we kill 50-70 millions of our own in cultural revolution after that and just shrug that off as if the asshole that did it has “some good side” or whatever. Fuck that asshole killed far more Chinese than Jews killed by Hitler yet Chinese don’t look at him as too bad.

See… That’s because the Chinese’ ancestors, unlike Jews, always knew how to breed. After 10k years, those things add up you know.

Do they even know how to reproduce? I can’t believe Hitler wasted so much resources trying to exterminate a group that don’t breed fast enough.

I guess, we just gave them shoes too big to fill.

Did Jews control the media? Gee… I too would fear them if they do. I guess I should start speaking nice about them.

Hail Juden!

Ups. Wait a minute.

In ancient China, you can be Lingchied (death by 1 thousand cuts) for speaking against the emperor. Fang Xiaoru got his whole family killed to 9 agnates (totally 800) for refusing to legitimize emperor Yong Le’s coup. That emperor than erased all memory of the Jiang Wen (previous) emperor and spend a great deal of money killing all Jiang Wen’s loyalist. And that is during the Ming dinasty, one of the most long lasting prosperous capitalistic dynasty in the whole world at that time, perhaps till today given that US just signed a socialist bill.

Now, that’s what I call controlling the media.

You do that, and most people (the Chinese at least) will think you got mandate from heaven to govern everything under it, quite literally. Everybody knows it isn’t true, yet every body knows it effectively is. I mean if someone can mass murder 9 agnates, well, he controls the media anyway not like the truth will come up so whatever he says is effectively true, yea, right, whatever. Psssstt…. Open secret. Like porn.

In Arab, internet sites with .il cannot be accessed without proxy. In many countries, there is no synagogue. We got terrorists killing people for having different opinion. Denmark is pressured to apology for embracing free speech. In China, they got great firewall of china. Not to mention that many porn are politically incorrect, or even illegal.

Looks to me, everyone ELSE is controlling the media. Everyone else but Jews.

In which country Jews control the media? Not even in their own country (there is only one). I don’t even see them trying.

Not even in Israel. Yea, they prohibit gambling sites and tobacco ads, which is a form of control I suppose. But every other culture has their own bigots too. Jews don’t control the media more than others. If anything, their control is much less.

People are sick fuck tired with government bullshit controlling the media in every other country, Holywood movies ended up being popular. That’s not control. That’s people choosing better product. If anything, that’s liberation rather than control of media.

In Japan, for example, you got to put mosaic in movies to cover women’s modesty. How lame is that? Don’t tell me about how things go in Arab. You’ll be very surprised you won’t believe me anyway.

In US media are owned by public companies that must make money. No body can control the media in those countries.

No body is ling chied yet for being anti Semitic. Not even if they said that Jews don’t control the bank like what I am doing here. I guess I’ll just look out for angry rabbi knocking on my door with explosive vests. Huahem… Somehow, I feel that’s not what I should worry about.

Maybe I am wrong. If anyone can convince me that they do control the world’s media, I would persuade all my friends to give all Jews discounts.

I could use someone that can turn my bullshit into some mandatory text books all over the world. That’s how to sell books nowadays. Anyone can outsell Mein Kampf or Little Red Book if somebody controlling the media market make the books mandatory. Unfortunately, Jews simply didn’t control any media. Not that I know of.

Saying Jews control the media is like saying that the proponent of the sun rise in the east theory control the media. It’s like saying that pro market control the media. Duh… No body force you to believe that. If you want to believe the sun rise in the west fine, you won’t go to jail for it. Somehow most people believe that the sun rise in the east. Gee. I wonder why?

These underachieving mediocre Jews will never rule the world. They don’t deserve too much attention, let alone hatred. They’re just too passive, peaceful and complacent with what little they achieve and little population they manage to beget. All other anti Semites do just make them look way better than what they really are, somebody that’s just about like everyone else.

With their power and wealth they could have been the stud of Middle East. They could have built lots of night club and invite the prettiest Arab women to suck their cocks in porn effectively exterminating every lesser cocks in any countries not rich and capitalistic enough to compete for babes. That would be totally victimless.

Yet Dubai has more night clubs than Israel. Those Arab ended up being the stud. Well, good for them then.

I know that those Arabs got really big cocks. But Jews shouldn’t fear that. Size is not everything. Often, IQ and productively earned wealth attract hot cunts too way more than bigger cocks.

Some might say that’s not the real issue. Well, what do we know?

I think if we want respect we should redirect our hatred against the true source of evil. That is not Jews but UGLY BITCHES, especially the feminazis. Ugly bitches are dangerous. International ugly bitches’ conspiracy has controlled the whole world.

UGLY BITCHES rather than JEWS are the true source of evil in the world.

Ugly bitches control the media.

How come our children are poisoned by bullshit like “Love is blind?” How come porn is declared dangerous for minor? While nonsense like romance becomes children fairy tales?

I’ve seen a documentary on women trafficking. The trafficker explains that 90% of trafficked women know that they will be a sex worker. Yet, how come the ugly bitches’ controlled media only interview the 10% in that documentary? The truth is, ugly bitches in rich country don’t want to compete with cheaper undervalued prettier cunts from poorer countries. That’s why they oppose women trafficking, like inferior businessmen opposing globalization.

Also high quality specimens showing their God given talents to the whole world would set a new industry standard the rest must follow. That’s why ugly bitches hate porn. Miyabi, for example, cannot come to a country just because she is a pretty porn star. Ugly bitches want all women to wear ninja clothes.

Hitler once said that women shouldn’t learn to throw grenades in the front line of war. Well, what about if the woman is ugly? Of course they should learn to throw grenades. What else are they for?

They’re not pretty enough to make babies. For women to make babies they need to turn cocks on, and that takes beauty. Duhh…. Is Hitler brainwashed too by international ugly bitches’ conspiracy?

Ugly bitches and lesser cocks interpret religions in ways that oppose competition. They said that that no woman wants to share a man no matter how much richer, and smarter the alpha males cocks are relative to other lesser cocks she could properly marry.

That means if any women want to have sex outside life long monogamous marriage, it must be a miracle.

As Jesus said, what’s impossible for men is not impossible for God. Yet I never see Catholic Church examine those miracles with as much accuracy as they examine all other supposedly less credible “miracles”. I smell some fucking conspiracy here. Looks like those who can’t compete “did it again” controlling the media fooling all of us.

Anyway, though I have some sympathy for German given that they really had a hard time unfairly due to Versailles agreement and yet manage to become an industrious nation. It’s amazing how German can become an industrious nation from scratch after WWII. I also knew the commie Russians are assholes. Who aren’t in a world before globalization?

I do think the Nazis really made a big mistake in choosing Jews to hate. They pick the wrong enemy. Even Hitler didn’t hate the one Jew that treat his Mom. Maybe he just tried to ride along European’s anti-Semitism at that time to unite the bigots. It’s the same reason why George Bush and Osama Bin Laden hate porn. To attract bigots that’ can’t attract mates.

All those Nazis have so much hate. All those hatred shouldn’t go to waste. We should guide them to aim those hatred positively, against ugly bitches and feminazis rather than the mediocre, underachieving, innocent Jews.

Exterminating ugly bitches, through competition, will make a more beautiful world, because what’s left will be the pretty.

Hating Jews is stupid even though they don’t control the media. Imagine if they really did?

Oh by the way, I am not Jewish, I am Chinese. I am just fucking confused of people making a big fuss about Jews. They’re not too good, well, quite actually,but not too much, and not too bad, and very few. So what’s all the fuss?

I mean killing each other sucks. So what? Sucks things happen. What’s so unusual?

We should exterminate each other through competition instead rather than through the economically inefficient war. Not like everyone agree. Duh…..

Out competing each other should be a fitting final solution to kick anything undesirable. I mean ugly bitches, of course, not Jews. Some Jewish babes are pretty hot.

Anti semites are giving Jews too much credit.

Most semites are not even jewish anyway. The other semites, like the Arabs, are even crazier.

Maybe we should start questioning religions we import from those Semites, as well as all religions in general, and let those semites kill each other. I mean, if they’re busy killing each other means they’re not killing us.

The rest of us can just peacefully embrace capitalism and breed like rabbit.

From the most “honest” anti semite in the world, figuring out that Jews are not worth hating. http://screw-feminazis.getlaidwithoutbeingbroke.com/commercialize-sex

I think there is a porn bible. I forget who the comic writer is. The name start with R. It shows actual bible stories with lots of explicit nudity. Something like Milo Manara.

Bible actually tell us (well, Jews actually), to attack another country, kill all the male, and rape all the virgin females. What religion says and what bible says have little in common. Religions are always ways to justify political motives.

Because the political structure in ancient time differs than now, it’s only natural that religions then have different interpretation now than before. In ancient time, the king rules. So polygamy is okay (because all kings want it). Now, we are democracy. So polygamy is not okay because swing voters don’t like it. Very simple.

Pick any 2 countries with Similar religion and you see differing custom. In Indonesia, which is democratic by now, polygamy is very politically incorrect that congress start making laws banning it. In Saudi, a monarch, it’s a different story.

Pick any 2 countries with DIFFERENT religion, and you’ll see the same custom. Polygamy is politically incorrect in both Indonesia and China, for example.

If you ask a Christian what the bible says, you can predict what his political agenda is. That’s it. People prohibits porn and go to war not because they are pious. They do so because they hate porn and like war.

I am talking to some Jewish friends that claim that hebrew bible has different meaning than the way it’s translated. Well, I’d like to know if there is some 5-10% trace of a REAL GOD, in judaism or whether it’s just another folklore. 90% of religions are definitely product of secular imagination.

What’s really funny is I saw a book about how a Christian writer use Solomo as a sample on how to get rich. I was like, Come the fuck on. Solomo got rich because he oppressed the people.

In fact, tax was so high during Solomo’s time that the kingdom split into 2. The “Shiah” Jews, also called Judah, believe that king must be David’s decendant, and the “Sunni” Jews, called Israelites, or Samaritants then believe they can pick their own leader.

Huahem…. Again and again. Oh ya, they kill each other over dispute on whether God is in mount Zion or in mount Moriah or something. Just like Christians. Some cultures never change.

If a kettle doesn’t have steam holes, then it will explode. The same way, no government can completely abolish freedom. Then those who truly are ambitious will break the kettle.

There are many countries in the world where you cannot be rich honestly and productively. In fact, there is no country in the world where you can do so without some sort of penalty. In US, doing that is punishable by tax, and that’s not much different from (still?) communist countries like China.

But here is the magic, there is no country in the world where you cannot be rich or richer than your peer. Not even in North Korea.

Extermination of Jews is politically incorrect because the Jews have no choice. Yet extermination of political opponents by Stalin, and Mao, which are just as evil, are more politically correct. On the latter, people have a choice, despite a bad one, to simply kowtow to the power elite.

Think about it.

There is always choice. If you think positively and ignore your conscience, you will see that there is always a choice.

There are always a loopholes. Perhaps the purpose of all these censorship is to hide too loopholes so not too many people find it. You don’t have to get married. Forcing everyone to get married first before having sex will be very difficult. But governments ensure that all media information encouraging extra marital alternatives are “dangerous for minor.”

Perhaps the purpose of all sexual norms are there to put land mines across the loopholes so societies can say, ah you made a mistake. But there is always a choice.

Prostitution is illegal, but escort is not. You can’t pay for sex, unless you film it and show to the world (porn is legal). In countries where porn is illegal polygamy is okay, and informal marriage is fine too. In Iran, contract marriage like cohabitation agreement is legal.

So you just declare, every time you’re caught with some women, that you actually have married her informally. Or maybe made some arrangement before hand. In those countries laws are not clear anyway and public perception of moral matters more than whether you actually break the law or not.

In Indonesia, a country with muslim majority, porn is illegal, but sex outside marriage is not except in some small town you can easily avoid. I mean, all our politicians have several informal concubines there is no way they want to mess with that. Cops sometimes go to hotels and caught unmarried couple, but never to expensive 4 stars hotel .

Massage therapists often provide “extra” service, and no body care.

Income tax has plenty of loophole for those truly rich. Otherwise, the best and brightest among us will go on strike.

This should get our hope up. Be rich. Be careful. And we’ll get whatever we want without having too fight our society too much.

Oh ya, keep your mouth shut. If the loopholes are known, they will have to close it. That sort of thing. I guess the key for gene pool survival is then to do our best to pick the narrow road to salvation. Jesus would agree.

My educated guess is parents need to support their child. So government can declare, for example, that each kid deserve $5k year. Anyone that don’t make $5k/year must not make kids (possibly with vasectomy penalty). If parents want to invest more, it’s up to parent. Also women should be able to negotiate child support before hand with men and that should be enforceable in court.

Think about it. With no fault marriage many complaint that couples can no longer make marriage commitment. The problem with that argument is that there are plenty of other reasonable, arguably more “fair” commitment people cannot legally make with each other outside marriage.

Why not let people make their own contract? Isn’t this the heart of libertarian feminist? Not a rhetorical question but you disagree with my explanation anyway.

Imagine a male saying to a woman, if you agree to have sex with me any time I want you got $10k/year. Also you’ll earn $5k/year for each of my biological children you give birth too. In addition the following are my reasonable exit clauses, pension plan, severance pay, etc.

In a sense, a whore is actually free while a wife is a whore that agree to let government be the pimp. Yet every time I promote legalization of various consensual sex for money arrangement people would knee jerkly say I demean women. At the end, I kind got a kick off in actually offending the feminist

Why not use that instead of marriage? That way no body have to bitch that marriage law is unfair right? Just make their own contract that they think is fair and let the woman decide. Is the contract more fair? Is it a good deal for woman? Why not let the woman decide? Basically illegal last time I check. Not a rhetorical question like usual In fact this is what motivates me to write my e-book. I wanted to have a purpose in life. Something with meaning. I want to make thousands of kids and I am very surprised that there is simply no normal way you can do that legally no matter how rich and attractive you are.

Of course, it’s pretty useless trying to understand others’ argument that’s based on prejudice anyway. But let’s check.

One argument is that there is the “child”‘s interest. It’s kind of funny. There are plenty of child that is born into poverty and still cost huge amount of taxpayer money. Yet government simply criminalize a billionaire that pay say, 10k per year for his wife and child. Somehow government set that wife and child deserve money proportional to a man’s wealth rather than letting supply and demand relationship decide “price” like usual. It’s like price control. Yea the kids’ interest is problematic but parents’ interest typically coincide with their blood line far more than government right? Sounds a lot like price control there.

Seems to me there is no easy way an American male can mate and reproduce without significantly risk ALL his wealth isn’t it?

Here, in my country, there are plenty of kids in the street that are sodomized, forced to beg, or whatever. People don’t care. Yet if you put your kids to programming school at age 6 people will say you “abuse” your child. Also people keep saying that porn is dangerous for minor. Yet giving birth of kids into poverty is not a crime, despite obvious adverse effect to the kid. Hmmmm… What kind of utility function the law makers really have? Any guess??

But curiously. Maybe you disagree a lot with me with many area. What’s your idea of child support should be? Should parent be able to decide before hand the amount of support they want to make before conception. Of course within reasonable limit. Say, $5k/year

Stop antagonizing the best and brightest or you ended up like German in world war 2. That being said, the German and Napoleon were pretty nice to Jews in previous war before that and lost anyway. So don’t give them too many special privilege either.

I think the Jews are pretty reasonable people. There was once upon a time I was accused of damaging my dorms’ washing machine. Many knows I didn’t do it. No body spoke up. One did. She is a Jew. A professor that went the extra mile so I can keep going to school is a Jew.

There was a class I got an AB in Math because when I asked the professor how to get a good grade the prof simply said to work hard and try to understand. In the next class, I easily got the highest score. I scored perfect. The next best score was like 75 or something. The professor in that next class, is a Jew and I bet the prof in the previous class isn’t.

“But you were taking honor classes. The other students are very smart there,” said a mediating professor. What’s his point anyway? I tearfully explained how my other friends all got A but me. Then I have to further explained that they got A on THE university. That is, the university he’s working for, the university I was taking the class, the relevant one.

At that time I should have known my whole academic career is over. If only I knew how to start a biz.

Latter I took graduate math course straight without prerequisite while I only have 2 days to learn before mid and final. I got A easily and the professor is once again a Jew. Hell I’ll vote for Jews to rule the world . Just kidding.

A psychiatrist that helped me understand life was a Jew. A forum owner where I hang around a lot is a Jew. There are nice reasonable normal people all over the world from many different race that are nice to me. Why is it when someone is “reasonable” there is a high chance he/she is a Jew?

Evolution and prosecution force them to be smart and it’s natural that the smart and diligence earn more money.

Hell, if we keep breeding the smartest chimpanzees and slaughtering those that don’t figure out how to avoid it eventually they’ll be pretty smart too.

However, most cultures like Chinese or Europe have dysgenic laws that prevent the best and brightest from reproducing. Monks don’t get married. There is virtually no way a rich smart male in US can mate with women without risking his WHOLE money.

Pretty women’s choice are either free sex or full blown life long monogamous marriage.

In free sex, the women got roses and chocolate that expire quickly and they have to keep coming back for more. Evolutionary psychologists say that’s what makes chocolate and roses romantic.

In marriage, government is the pimp that enforce some form of price control to protect most voters from adverse effect of free fair competition. In marriage, the bitch got full life long monogamous commitment with exclusive supplier contract, exorbitant severance pay, and a blank check to have all her kids provided irrelevant of who actually knocked her up.

Too many “couples” would consensually choose somewhere between if the choices were legal and that’s why somewhere between choices are usually illegal or legally impossible.

The Arab is actually quite reasonable because they allow polygamy and contract marriage. Like the rest, those are not getting any also use religion or other supernatural out of this world explanation as excuses to limit sexual selection’s choice often far more violently. Well, the lesser cocks are hungrier in Arab I suppose.

It’s simple. If we truly are free to choose, we often choose someone else. We may even prefer to choose something else as in case of most males preferences to watch porn rather than marrying an ugly woman.

Those that won’t get chosen are often capable and jerks enough to make rules limiting our choices. Under NO country in the world men and women have right to choose their mate under ANY REASONABLE CONSENSUAL terms. There are just too many limitation that SERIOUSLY AFFECT SEXUAL SELECTION in favor of those sexually UNCOMPETITIVE.

Guess what? People think I am a delusional idiot. As always. As usual. As if what I am explaining is too outrageous to be true.

If you’re the best and brightest you just have to be complete jerks to win gene pool survival war in most cultures and most best and brightest people choose to be nice because they think they’ll win anyway despite their niceness. Minority groups like Jews in Europe or Chinese in Indonesia don’t have power or the luxury of killing each other and hence pick being competitive path more.

Those norms are created by and for economic losers that know they can’t compete with the best and brightest in the gene pool if they were nice. If not because of globalization, the world would be full with more and more angry socialists and religious bigots that enforce more bigotic norms. No wonder people become Nazis. Exterminating the best and brightest is how those bigot stay in the gene pool in the first place. Like father like son.

And don’t bother trying to understand their prejudice. The limit is imagination and the proof is faith. What is there to understand?

I mean there will be deflation. That’s one thing for sure. As technology goes up, cost of production is lower. So prices will drop.

What about interest rate? Will it be negative too?

Interest rate would drop I suppose. I mean money neutrality means that unless government do some “surprise” gold standard would not change anything. Main proponent of gold standard demand gold standard to prevent “surprise” from government.

So if gold price raise by say 6%. Current interest rate is 4%. I suppose interest rate would be around -2% if we use gold standard. But negative interest rate doesn’t make sense. Why would anyone save money if interest rate is negative?

Then how do we value the price of asset then?

Say interest rate is 4%. Then the value of assets is such that price per earning ratio is 25.

If we use gold standard interest rate drop to say, 1%. Then the value of that asset suddenly become 4 times. What am I missing?

The first and most straight forward way is to rape. That is politically incorrect now.

The second way is to consensually persuade the woman to mate with you. The problem is the world are filled with so many other males. Many are richer, smarter, taller, and more handsome.

Well but Tom Cruise, Bill Gates, and Kobe aim for someone higher than our typical target market. Not really. How do you know they want only one? Chinese emperor got 10k chicks and he didn’t even have flat TV and flush toilet.

The market does give more absolute wealth and prosperity to virtually everyone. If there is one thing the market don’t give to those politically powerful is relative wealth and power. The thing is, that’s what gets men laid.

Another problem is that consensually attracting women are often politically incorrect too. Most societies have so many norms prohibiting so many consensual acts for reasons that will be obvious shortly.

So consensually attracting hot babes is not the only thing most males count on.

The third way is then the most common way, namely to separate target market from competitors.

If target prefer Bob, it’s wrong because it’s not love. If target pick Hasan then it’s wrong because polygamy is bad. If target pick Liu Chan, then it’s wrong because prostitution is immoral. If target pick Mr. Tanaka then it’s wrong because hentai demean women. If target pick Jean Claude then it’s wrong because inter religious marriage is bad.

The list goes on and on. Women trafficking is illegal despite consent. No sex outside marriage. No sex for cash (but chocolate and flower is okay because it can signal wealth nevertheless in a spendthrift way). No contract marriage, no polyandry, no bullshit. If the male is honest then he’s arrogant.

Each kid need daddy to spend at least 8 hours a day and 20% of his income no matter how wealthy daddy is to ensure rich dad don’t have 1000 kids. No this. No that.

The limit is just imagination. The proof is faith. It’s useless trying to argue with bigots or working too much to comply with all the norms that any competitors would come up. It just won’t work.

Finally, unless you’re really bad, eventually the girl picks you. Then it’s sacred and a big OK.

Is prostitution victimless? What about sex outside heavily regulated life long monogamous marriage governments prescribe? Despite various institutional advantage for married couple, 50% of kids born in US are born out of wedlock suggesting that sex outside marriage surely have its attraction over marriage.

But is it victimless?

Well, in a sense yes, in a sense no. Depends on how you define “victim”.

Say cheap product comes from China. The product is cheaper and is in better quality. Then many people buy the product. Is it victimless? No force involved. No fraud involved. It’s consensual. In fact, it’s more than consensual, it’s a good deal. Is it victimless? Well, does everyone support globalization and free trade?

No. There are disgruntled envy competitors that just do not want to see YOU enjoying better deals. If better deals are available from you then you don’t need to buy from them. Those bigots then demand heavy punishments against acts that do not involve fraud or force. Often things are prohibited not because it’s bad, but because it’s TOO GOOD.

So good, it drives out governments’ endorsed alternative of competition. If government do nothing, there will be little intensive for lobbyist to spend millions of dollars to buy law makers. If you’re a law maker, what would you do?

The same way with free sex, though I won’t elaborate. I mean if the cause why people hate free trade is because of competition, it’s a very natural guess to think that people hate free sex out of the same reason too.

However, to prohibit something you need a reason. You need to convince others that somehow the prohibited things are so bad. You need to convince others. Unfortunately, wrong things cannot be proofed, by definition of proof. So you need something that makes people believe anyway DESPITE lack of evidence.

That is called faith.